2009/3/26, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com:
Have a look at:
http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/delphilater.txt
Thanks, that is interesting discussion. I will post my thoughts on
that in a separate mail.
On the fpc-pascal mailing list or maybe the fpc-decel mailing list, I presume.
Vincent
Flávio Etrusco schrieb:
What is the function of being able to add methods to records?
Not much, I agree, given the existence of objects. It would be better to do
that
instead of introducing 'object' keyword, but that decision was made
back in the days
of Borland Pascal.
Indeed, not
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
And string-case for my feeling belongs in neither. It is just about racking
up bullet lists in language wars.
Well, there is another important design principle. It is sometimes called
orthogonality -- it means that existing language features can be
combined in any
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 17:56, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
Since string was introduced as built-in scalar type with defined equality,
lack of 'case' support can be viewed as a design bug.
IMO strings are similarly scalar as are floating point
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 18:59, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:28:50AM +1000, Alexander Klenin wrote:
What problem does for in really solve?
Lack of iterators.
No it doesn't IMHO.
This is really nice argument ;-) Well, it _should_ solve it.
If it does
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:28:50AM +1000, Alexander Klenin wrote:
Since string was introduced as built-in scalar type with defined
equality, lack of 'case' support can be viewed as a design bug.
I don't see string as a scalar type. It is an array or complex
Getting back to the original question...
I implemented it with (as Michael van Canneyt suggested)
function wcase(Needle:string;Haystack:array of string):integer;
begin
Result:=High(HayStack);
While (Result=0) and (CompareText(Needle,Haystack[Result])0) do
Dec(Result);
end;
case
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
What problem does for in really solve?
Lack of iterators.
No it doesn't IMHO. And I assume that by lack of iterators you mean
in-language iterators?
Iterators are quite doable with all the base list/container
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
And I assume that by lack of iterators you mean in-language iterators?
Of course. What else?
External iterators without the need for implementing descendants. But
I must agree, it would really be nice if we can
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:29:42PM +1000, Alexander Klenin wrote:
Lack of iterators.
No it doesn't IMHO.
This is really nice argument ;-) Well, it _should_ solve it.
If it does not, it must be extended of implemented differently.
I definitely do not argue in favor of blindly copying
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:06:03AM +, Martin Friebe wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Since string was introduced as built-in scalar type with defined
equality, lack of 'case' support can be viewed as a design bug.
I don't see string as a scalar type. It is an array or complex type
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
var
i: integer; item: TItem;
...
for i := 0 to obj.ItemCount do begin
item := Items[i];
... item ... item ...
end;
Minus one btw.
And my iterator case is proven. :-) Like I said earlier - one of the
Alexander Klenin wrote:
1) Iterating over array property, where and item should be stored in a
temporary variable
to avoid rereated calls to GetItem method inside the loop iteration:
var
i: integer; item: TItem;
...
for i := 0 to obj.ItemCount do begin
item := Items[i];
... item
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 23:07, Marc Weustink marc.weust...@cuperus.nl wrote:
Alexander Klenin wrote:
1) Iterating over array property, where and item should be stored in a
temporary variable
to avoid rereated calls to GetItem method inside the loop iteration:
var
i: integer; item:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
...
for item in obj.Items do begin
... item ... item ...
end;
the latter is safer, simpler and more clear code.
ehm, what if I want it reversed ?
Reverse iteration might be common enough to warrant a special
Alexander Klenin wrote:
Reverse iteration might be common enough to warrant a special syntax,
but in general all non-standard iteration orders should fall back to indexing.
Then better to extend sintax:
using default iterator = delphi compatible
FOR s IN list DO
WriteLn(s);
extended:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 00:22, Paul Ishenin webpi...@mail.ru wrote:
FOR s IN list DO
WriteLn(s);
extended:
FOR s IN list USING my_reverse_iterator DO
WriteLn(s);
In upper case I wrote keywords and in lower case identifiers.
I think the extension can be avoided like so:
FOR s IN
On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:22 AM, lazarus-requ...@lazarus.freepascal.org
wrote:
No, since for all common usage patterns based the IDE codetools
creates the
pattern for you.
-
I don't currently use an IDE which performs these types of things.
I've just peeked at the Lazarus IDE
HI
Sorry, this shuld be new topic on pascal devel list, but on other side
this is reply on those post.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
And I assume that by lack of iterators you mean in-language iterators?
Of course. What else?
With regard to my 0013298report (
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13298#c26380 ), this is my comment about
the Trim Spaces Style located in the editor options.
In my opinion, the Caret or Edit mode should be the default mode although
each mode listed there is reasonable/logical to be
Sayyid Ibnu Husein Al-'Aththÿe2s wrote:
With regard to my 0013298
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13298#c26380 report (
http://bugs.freepascal..org/view.php?id=13298#c26380
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13298#c26380 ), this is my
comment about the Trim
Sayyid Ibnu Husein Al-'Aththÿe2s wrote:
With regard to my 0013298
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13298#c26380 report (
http://bugs.freepascal..org/view.php?id=13298#c26380
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13298#c26380 ), this is my
comment about the Trim
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
No, Lazarus now has an excelent support for Carbon, which uses the
native Aqua look from Macs. Here a screenshot of Lazarus running in
Mac OS X:
OK, so that means there is only a Visual Forms Designer for Carbon
apps and not for Cocoa apps because LCL-Cocoa doesn't exist yet? Is
this correct?
LCL-Cocoa does exists. http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/PasCocoa
It's about 2% done, but it exists :)
working with OS-X Leopard because
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:32:10 +0100
Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
If anybody would like to read the article or see the code, it is on a
request basis - I may not publicly publish the article.
I would like to yes. Containertypes is one of my interests.
I am interested, too. It
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:41:13PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
?? i: integer; item: TItem;
...
for i := 0 to obj.ItemCount do begin
?? item := Items[i];
?? ... item ... item ...
end;
Minus one btw.
And my iterator case is proven. :-) Like I said earlier - one of the
Hi,
I have stored procedure in FireBird:
EXECUTE PROCEDURE ZnajdzKodKreskowy (:Kod, 0, 0, 0, :IleCyfrSprawdzac)
RETURNING_VALUES (:Jest, :Zlecenie, :I1, :I2, :I3, :I4, :D, :I5, :S);
I was trying to get returning values to lazarus code, but I couldn't. I
find out that there is no StoredProcedure
Hello,
I'm looking for a documentation about explain plan in Firebird, and I wonder
if anyone here knows a good documentation about it, or can point to good
examples that explain all of the possibilities and how it works.
I read few examples in forums etc... but I think that I'm missing something
Hello Thierry,
Thursday, March 26, 2009, 10:16:32 PM, you wrote:
TEST PROGRAM
TC program Test1;
{$MODE OBJFPC}
--
Best regards,
JoshyFun
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
On Thursday 26 March 2009 05:16:32 pm Thierry Coq wrote:
TEST PROGRAM
program Test1;
var
i, j : integer; //input data
k, l : integer; //interval
m: integer; //index
maxCycles : integer; //max number of cycles for the interval
Cycles: integer;
// This function
On Thursday 26 March 2009 06:47:45 pm Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Thursday 26 March 2009 05:16:32 pm Thierry Coq wrote:
TEST PROGRAM
program Test1;
var
i, j : integer; //input data
k, l : integer; //interval
m: integer; //index
maxCycles : integer; //max number
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
HasNext() Returns true if the collection has more items
when traversing the collection in the forward
direction.
This (and the Peek methods) require that the collection is organized
strictly sequential, for Previous in
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
Since string was introduced as built-in scalar type with defined equality,
lack of 'case' support can be viewed as a design bug.
IMO strings are similarly scalar as are floating point numbers, with
regards to 'case'.
Note that I said with defined equality. The
From: Martin Friebe laza...@mfriebe.de
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 1:21:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] About the Trim Spaces Style modes. Which one should be
the default mode?
Sayyid Ibnu Husein Alatas wrote:
... ...
In my opinion, the Caret or Edit mode should
34 matches
Mail list logo
