Oooo... Yes that is sticky...
If we know of a workaround (installing this file), then we should just
document it well, and then the developers of those applications will know
how to support users who inquires about it...?
But I agree in principle with the users who said "if it aint broke..."
Reenen Laurie wrote:
> AFAIK the lazarus .exe is built with Inno setup... maybe just have a
> separate .inno file to do the win9X installer...
>
> But the question is if "we" are allowed to distribute the file below.
the problem is not with lazarus itself but with applications made with
lazarus.
AFAIK the lazarus .exe is built with Inno setup... maybe just have a
separate .inno file to do the win9X installer...
But the question is if "we" are allowed to distribute the file below.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graeme Geldenhuys
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 9/2/08, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Another option is to add a dependency for the Unicode Layer for win98
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=73BA7BD7-ED06-4F0D-80A4-2A7EEAEE17E2&displaylang=en
>>
>>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:40:46AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 9/2/08, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Another option is to add a dependency for the Unicode Layer for win98
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=73BA7BD7-ED06-4F0D-
On 9/2/08, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Another option is to add a dependency for the Unicode Layer for win98
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=73BA7BD7-ED06-4F0D-80A4-2A7EEAEE17E2&displaylang=en
>
>From what I heard, MSLU is not standard
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How does FPC/Lazarus stand regarding this? I remember Felipe mention
>> that it is possible to support Win9x, or maybe I didn't understand him
>> correctly?
>>
>
> Laza
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> Lazarus already supports unicode in Win9x using a "best effort"
> approach since months. It's all explained in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/LCL_Unicode_Support#Guidelines
>
> Nick answered with what can be considered a
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 9/1/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > They are a commercial company, and there is no money to be made in win95.
> > Supporting win95 means more than just the unicode string, and holds back
> > on the feature front.
>
On 9/1/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They are a commercial company, and there is no money to be made in win95.
> Supporting win95 means more than just the unicode string, and holds back
> on the feature front.
We (our company) finally stopped supporting Win95 from the
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does FPC/Lazarus stand regarding this? I remember Felipe mention
> > that it is possible to support Win9x, or maybe I didn't understand him
> > correc
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does FPC/Lazarus stand regarding this? I remember Felipe mention
> that it is possible to support Win9x, or maybe I didn't understand him
> correctly?
Lazarus already supports unicode in Win9x using a "best effort
Hi,
How does FPC/Lazarus stand regarding this? I remember Felipe mention
that it is possible to support Win9x, or maybe I didn't understand him
correctly?
Original Message
Subject: Re: Can Delphi 2009 be used for Windows 9x at all?
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:11:09 -0700
From: N
13 matches
Mail list logo
