Re: [Lazarus] Was: New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

Felipe, As a fellow developer, I share you aches and pains. Debates get ugly and I understand first-hand how thankless it can sometimes feel. I hope you always find the strength to push onward on such a noble persuit. >From me at least, thank you for your efforts. It's because of people like

[Lazarus] Was: New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho < felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/4/21 ik : > > I was talking about this: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12591 > > With many implications on IRC of it. > > Very simple to solve this: Just add the gtk 2.8 code aro

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

Antonio Sanguigni pisze: > > > 2009/4/21 Bee mailto:bee.ogra...@gmail.com>> > > > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/New_IDE_features_since > > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/New_LCL_features_since > > Nice, Graeme! :) > > > I love that man :) > > Antonio > Awesome! very

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

2009/4/21 ik : > I was talking about this: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12591 > With many implications on IRC of it. Very simple to solve this: Just add the gtk 2.8 code around IFDEFs. I think this is already done for other features Absolutely unecessary to have hurt fealings and person

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho < felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/4/21 ik > > Actually I made some, but after the story of GTK 2.8 I stopped working on > it > > (you -> the core team made me very angry about how it was reacted), so > now > > someone n

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

2009/4/21 ik > Actually I made some, but after the story of GTK 2.8 I stopped working on it > (you -> the core team made me very angry about how it was reacted), so now > someone needs to work on it again, and it will not be me. I found nothing in the list archives about this, just some patches w

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Martin Friebe wrote: >> The IDE automatically highlights matching blocks - begin..end pairs. >> > I think that was/will be 0.9.28. ? Wiki has been updated. Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pas

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Vincent Snijders < vincent.snijd...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/4/21, Zaher Dirkey : > > I am working on Delphi 2007 but i like to have i a wish to ask to > > revert back to Delphi 7, i have big project on Delphi and not need any > > of that features from 7to 2007.

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Martin Friebe wrote: >> >> The IDE automatically highlights matching blocks - begin..end pairs. > > I think that was/will be 0.9.28. ? At least I couldn't fnd this in > 0.9.24 / 0.9.26 > > Revision: 18436 > Date: 13:36:29, 25 January 2009 > Message: SynEdit: Highli

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

from the wiki: > > > v0.9.18 (2006-11-22) > > block matching > > The IDE automatically highlights matching blocks - begin..end pairs. > I think that was/will be 0.9.28. ? At least I couldn't fnd this in 0.9.24 / 0.9.26 Revision: 18436 Date: 13:36:29, 25 January 2009 Message: SynEdit: Highligh

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

2009/4/21, Zaher Dirkey : > I am working on Delphi 2007 but i like to have i a wish to ask to > revert back to Delphi 7, i have big project on Delphi and not need any > of that features from 7to 2007. > > Vencet said > > >Who needs Right to Left ? ;-) > > > Me, and i have 3 projects(Win32, WinC

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

2009/4/21 Bee > > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/New_IDE_features_since > > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/New_LCL_features_since > > Nice, Graeme! :) > I love that man :) Antonio -- Antonio Sanguigni alias slapshot ---

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > I created my first gif animation with "xvidcap" and Gimp. It was SO > easy!  :-) I'll add it to the wiki shortly. I uploaded my first image to the wiki and referenced it in the IDE features page. Is there a wiki image naming conversio

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

I am working on Delphi 2007 but i like to have i a wish to ask to revert back to Delphi 7, i have big project on Delphi and not need any of that features from 7to 2007. Vencet said >Who needs Right to Left ? ;-) Me, and i have 3 projects(Win32, WinCE) on Lazarus used the BidiMode property. _

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:00 PM, "Leonardo M. Ramé" wrote: > Reports and LazReport, what is "Reports" I thought the only report > generator for Lazarus was LazReport. It's a typo I meant "reports as in LazReport". ;-) Regards, - Graeme - ___

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Bee wrote: > > Nice, Graeme! :) I created my first gif animation with "xvidcap" and Gimp. It was SO easy! :-) I'll add it to the wiki shortly. > To interest more Delphi programmers, maybe we could also provide some > kind of feature comparison list. We should p

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

Graeme, in this page: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/New_LCL_features_since you mention Reports and LazReport, what is "Reports" I thought the only report generator for Lazarus was LazReport. Leonardo M. Ramé Griensu S.A. - Medical IT Córdoba Tel.: 0351 - 4247979 Graeme Geldenhuys escri

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/New_IDE_features_since > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/New_LCL_features_since Nice, Graeme! :) To interest more Delphi programmers, maybe we could also provide some kind of feature comparison list. We should provide to kind of comparisons, first to Delphi

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

2009/4/21 ik : > Delphi 7 was the last "classic" ide of Delphi. The last "truly working" Delphi. I get it now. :-) > I think before we will implement such advance features, we first need to > implement missgin features from Delphi 2-7 . I'm not talking about implementing new features or featu

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

2009/4/21, ik : > Delphi 7 was the last "classic" ide of Delphi. > > I think before we will implement such advance features, we first need to > implement missgin features from Delphi 2-7 . > Such features are Right To Left language support (bidi and component > alignment) and few more. Who needs R

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

Delphi 7 was the last "classic" ide of Delphi. I think before we will implement such advance features, we first need to implement missgin features from Delphi 2-7 . Such features are Right To Left language support (bidi and component alignment) and few more. Ido On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:19 PM,

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > When I look at the features listed in the links below, I am more and > more impressed with Lazarus. (well done to all!) We have most of those > features and more... Such a wiki page or two would be a nice one-stop > show-off page like "

Re: [Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

To continue from my previous post... Also, grouping feature as they got introduced, by version number (with release date) will show that Lazarus didn't copy every thing from Borland. Lazarus had some feature way before Delphi. For example: * build in diff viewer * guidelines in the form desig

[Lazarus] New Lazarus IDE/LCL features since ...?

Hi all, Seeing that CodeGear has this "new features since Delphi 7", why can't we start something like that for Lazarus as well. I don't really know why exactly the CodeGear guys decided "since Delphi 7" and not another version though. When I look at the features listed in the links below, I am

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:45 PM, "Leonardo M. Ramé" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, we dont have telepathy abilities... > > Can you add telepathy abilities to the next Lazarus version? > > That would be great! You can get a pair of these, it might even work with Lazarus out of the box :)

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

Hello, another proposal: what about artificial intelligence (libAI.0.1.so)? :) regards tanila Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 14:27 -0300 schrieb "Leonardo M. Ramé": > I found it's added to future plans for versión 3.0: future plans > > > Bogusław Brandys

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

This could help: http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/dn13449-nervetapping-neckband-allows-telepathic-chat.html 2008/3/10, Mattias Gärtner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Zitat von Bogusław Brandys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > ik wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Ishenin <[EMA

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

Zitat von Bogusław Brandys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ik wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Ishenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > >> >> Sorry, we dont have telepathy abilities... > >> >> > >> > > >> > Can you add telepathy abilities to the next Lazarus v

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

I found it's added to future plans for versión 3.0: future plans Bogusław Brandys escribió: > ik wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Ishenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: >>> >> Sorry, we dont have telepa

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

ik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Ishenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: >> >> Sorry, we dont have telepathy abilities... >> >> >> > >> > Can you add telepathy abilities to the next Lazarus version? >> > >> > That would be great! >> > >> This is for Ma

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

The correct way to make this request is to submit a bug report. Chris Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: >> Sorry, we dont have telepathy abilities... >> > > Can you add telepathy abilities to the next Lazarus version? > > That would be great! > > Leonardo. >

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Ishenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > >> Sorry, we dont have telepathy abilities... > >> > > > > Can you add telepathy abilities to the next Lazarus version? > > > > That would be great! > > > This is for Mattias - he is our inn

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

Le Mar 10, 2008 à 2:42 PM, Damien Gerard a écrit : > > Le Mar 10, 2008 à 2:21 PM, Paul Ishenin a écrit : > >> Damien Gerard wrote: >>> I may have a stupid question. >>> Lazarus is compiled with Win32/Unicode. My App too. When you design >>> your form (TNoteBook,TSpeedButton,TListView...) all perf

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: >> Sorry, we dont have telepathy abilities... >> > > Can you add telepathy abilities to the next Lazarus version? > > That would be great! > This is for Mattias - he is our innovation manager. Best regards, Paul Ishenin. _

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

Le Mar 10, 2008 à 2:21 PM, Paul Ishenin a écrit : > Damien Gerard wrote: >> I may have a stupid question. >> Lazarus is compiled with Win32/Unicode. My App too. When you design >> your form (TNoteBook,TSpeedButton,TListView...) all perfectly work. >> (means all components are properly displayed).

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

> Sorry, we dont have telepathy abilities... Can you add telepathy abilities to the next Lazarus version? That would be great! Leonardo. ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] IDE/LCL

Damien Gerard wrote: > I may have a stupid question. > Lazarus is compiled with Win32/Unicode. My App too. When you design > your form (TNoteBook,TSpeedButton,TListView...) all perfectly work. > (means all components are properly displayed). But at the runtime > there always are problems when

[Lazarus] IDE/LCL

I may have a stupid question. Lazarus is compiled with Win32/Unicode. My App too. When you design your form (TNoteBook,TSpeedButton,TListView...) all perfectly work. (means all components are properly displayed). But at the runtime there always are problems when displaying. I thought it was