On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Vincent Snijders
> wrote:
> >
> > I just do:
> > FPCSRCDIR=/path/to/fpc/sources
> > make rtl.chk FPCSRCDIR=$FPCSRCDIR
>
> That's even better. :-)
>
> Michael, could you add this to the readme file as well?
Done
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Vincent Snijders
wrote:
>
> I just do:
> FPCSRCDIR=/path/to/fpc/sources
> make rtl.chk FPCSRCDIR=$FPCSRCDIR
That's even better. :-)
Michael, could you add this to the readme file as well?
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, the description is now much better (clearer). I still have
> > problems though. Can I use a symlink'ed docs directory? The layout is
> > still as I shown in my
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
> You can't use a symlinked docs directory, the link points in the wrong
> direction.
>
> You could try symlinked rtl/compiler/packages directories from the point
> of view of the docs.
I'm curious as to why it should make a difference
2009/4/28, Michael Van Canneyt :
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > Thanks, the description is now much better (clearer). I still have
> > problems though. Can I use a symlink'ed docs directory? The layout is
> > still as I shown in my previous email, but I get the followi
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>
> Thanks, the description is now much better (clearer). I still have
> problems though. Can I use a symlink'ed docs directory? The layout is
> still as I shown in my previous email, but I get the following output.
OK, clearly for some v
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
> >
> > The following should do it:
> >
> > make rtl.chk
> > make fcl.chk
> >
> > And you don't need latex2html, but tex4ht for the other things.
> > I changed the README file so it's m
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
> The following should do it:
>
> make rtl.chk
> make fcl.chk
>
> And you don't need latex2html, but tex4ht for the other things.
> I changed the README file so it's more correct.
Thanks, the description is now much better (clearer).
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
> >
> > What is so hard about typing
> > make html
> > ?
>
> /opt/fpcdocs_svn $ make html
> make -C ../compiler/utils msg2inc
> make: *** ../compiler/utils: No such file or directory.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>
>
> OK, so clearly 'fpcdocs_svn' must be in a different directory layout.
I then guessed that fpcdocs_svn must be somewhere in the FPC source
directory. So I did that by creating a 'docs' symlink in my FPC source
directory:
/opt/fpc/src
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
> What is so hard about typing
> make html
> ?
/opt/fpcdocs_svn $ make html
make -C ../compiler/utils msg2inc
make: *** ../compiler/utils: No such file or directory. Stop.
make: *** [../compiler/utils/msg2inc] Error 2
OK, so clearly
2009/4/28, Graeme Geldenhuys :
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Vincent Snijders
> wrote:
> >
> > I tried to do it for the off line docs, but the --footer-date
> > parameter is overridden by the --footer parameter which adds a link to
> > the on-line documentation. So for now, also no date
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Vincent Snijders
> wrote:
> >
> > I tried to do it for the off line docs, but the --footer-date
> > parameter is overridden by the --footer parameter which adds a link to
> > the on-line documentation. So for now,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Vincent Snijders
wrote:
>
> I tried to do it for the off line docs, but the --footer-date
> parameter is overridden by the --footer parameter which adds a link to
> the on-line documentation. So for now, also no date stamp in the off
> line documentation.
As expe
2009/4/28, Vincent Snijders :
> 2009/4/28, Graeme Geldenhuys :
>
> > Compare these for example...
> >
> > http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/
> > vs
> > http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/
> >
> >
> > Which one is newer? fpdoc now supports a command line parameter
> > (
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Vincent Snijders
wrote:
>> FCL and RTL docs are not created nightly - hence the reason I thought
>> the LCL ones follow suit. I guess I was wrong.
>
> Why do you think so? What files are out of date on
> http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/
> or
> http:/
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>
> FCL and RTL docs are not created nightly - hence the reason I thought
> the LCL ones follow suit. I guess I was wrong.
By that I mean the FCL and RTL docs hosted on www.freepascal.org. Are
the FCL and RTL docs hosted on lazarus-ccr a
2009/4/28, Graeme Geldenhuys :
>
> OK, I see your point. Then again, if the documentation is generate
> nightly, it is always up to date, so the whole issue of out-of-date
> docs is moot. :-)
>
> FCL and RTL docs are not created nightly - hence the reason I thought
> the LCL ones follow suit.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Vincent Snijders
wrote:
>
> I am hesitant to do that. Documentation on sourceforge is generated
> nighlty and rsynced with the files on SourceForge. It is a bit silly
> to update these files daily because the datestamp changed.
OK, I see your point. Then again,
2009/4/28, Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Compare these for example...
>
> http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/
> vs
> http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/
>
>
> Which one is newer? fpdoc now supports a command line parameter
> (--footer-date='-mm-dd') which allows the date the docume
Compare these for example...
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/
vs
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/
Which one is newer? fpdoc now supports a command line parameter
(--footer-date='-mm-dd') which allows the date the documentation
was generated on to be added to the footer
21 matches
Mail list logo
