> Mensagem Original:
> Data: 20:26:35 14/12/2008
> De: Joost van der Sluis
> Assunto: Re: [Lazarus] TAChart: Request to review/apply patch 12758
> Op zondag 14-12-2008 om 10:18 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Florian
> Klaempfl:
>> Luiz Americo Pereira Camara schrie
Op zondag 14-12-2008 om 10:18 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Florian
Klaempfl:
> Luiz Americo Pereira Camara schrieb:
> > Florian Klaempfl escreveu:
> >> Alexander Klenin schrieb:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:39, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> >>>
> Same for Alexander Klenin - if you n
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara schrieb:
> Florian Klaempfl escreveu:
>> Alexander Klenin schrieb:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:39, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>>>
Same for Alexander Klenin - if you need to update TAChart very often
then ask about write access to svn/lazarus/trunk/compo
Florian Klaempfl escreveu:
> Alexander Klenin schrieb:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:39, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>>
>>> Same for Alexander Klenin - if you need to update TAChart very often
>>> then ask about write access to svn/lazarus/trunk/components/tachart
>>>
>> Yes, it can be a
Op vrijdag 12-12-2008 om 18:54 uur [tijdzone +1000], schreef Alexander
Klenin:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:27, Florian Klaempfl
> wrote:
> > Alexander Klenin schrieb:
> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:39, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> >>> Same for Alexander Klenin - if you need to update TAChart very oft
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:27, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Alexander Klenin schrieb:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:39, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>>> Same for Alexander Klenin - if you need to update TAChart very often
>>> then ask about write access to svn/lazarus/trunk/components/tachart
>>
>> Yes, it c
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:39, Paul Ishenin wrote:
>> Same for Alexander Klenin - if you need to update TAChart very often
>> then ask about write access to svn/lazarus/trunk/components/tachart
>
> Yes, it can be a workaround for my particular case, so whom should I as
Alexander Klenin schreef:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:32, Jesus Reyes wrote:
>> If it gets applied it has to be temporal and as such, we need a patch for
>> fpc also and another taking in count the patched fpc (but that can wait of
>> course), if the fpc patch doesn't make it, it's unlikely the
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:32, Jesus Reyes wrote:
> If it gets applied it has to be temporal and as such, we need a patch for fpc
> also and another taking in count the patched fpc (but that can wait of
> course), if the fpc patch doesn't make it, it's unlikely the crack will be
> commited.
Of
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:39, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> Same for Alexander Klenin - if you need to update TAChart very often
> then ask about write access to svn/lazarus/trunk/components/tachart
Yes, it can be a workaround for my particular case, so whom should I ask?
In general, though, patch revi
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> An real example:
> - i'm the developer of the Sqlite component shipped with fpc.
Then maybe the best for you is to ask about write access to the SqlLite
subtree of fpc trunk?
Same for Alexander Klenin - if you need to update TAChart very often
then ask abou
Florian Klaempfl escreveu:
> Alexander Klenin schrieb:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 20:16, Florian Klaempfl
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Alexander Klenin schrieb:
>>>
I.e. my specific problem can be solved in SVN by creating a branch of
TAChart
component and giving me commit ac
--- El jue 11-dic-08, Alexander Klenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
[snip]
> I did produce some patch, see my mail "FCL-DB: Extend
> TLookupList so
> it can be used as picklist source" in the fpc-devel
> list.
> However, it seems there are even fewer reviewers in FPC
> team than
> Lazarus team
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:32, Jesus Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about the dbgrid one, btw, cracker classes are sometimes called
> "access" classes but in this case I think it really made justice to the name,
> have you tried that on fpc 2.2.2 and current 2.3.1?.
>
> If it gets appli
--- El jue 11-dic-08, Alexander Klenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
[snip]
>
> I.e. my specific problem can be solved in SVN by creating a
> branch of TAChart
> component and giving me commit access to it, but then
> similar branch should be created for my patches to DBGrid,
> and yet anothe
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 20:16, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alexander Klenin schrieb:
>>> I.e. my specific problem can be solved in SVN by creating a branch of
>>> TAChart
>>> component and giving me commit access to it, but then
>>> similar branch sho
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 20:16, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Klenin schrieb:
>> I.e. my specific problem can be solved in SVN by creating a branch of TAChart
>> component and giving me commit access to it, but then
>> similar branch should be created for my patches to DBGr
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
> Obviously, this is not a scalable solution for many developers ;-)
>
I forget to mention: how does a DVCS scale better in this regard for
small and medium sized projects (<100 developers)? As long as you don't
get rejected commits due to two commits by two people at th
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
>> I really wonder how a DVCS would solve this or what would be different?
>> You just apply it to your local working copy and you've it in your builds?
>
> Yes. The most important difference in this case is that DVCS
> would preserve local history. This is similar to eve
> I really wonder how a DVCS would solve this or what would be different?
> You just apply it to your local working copy and you've it in your builds?
Yes. The most important difference in this case is that DVCS
would preserve local history. This is similar to every developer having
his own branch
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
> See http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12758
>
> Sorry to bother Daruis (and everyone else) again, but
> this patch is holding my further work on TAChart.
>
> Such are the problems of using centralized version control ;-)
>
I really wonder how a DVCS would solve
Alexander Klenin escreveu:
> See http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12758
>
> Sorry to bother Daruis (and everyone else) again, but
> this patch is holding my further work on TAChart.
>
> Such are the problems of using centralized version control ;-)
>
+1
I have similar problems recently,
See http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12758
Sorry to bother Daruis (and everyone else) again, but
this patch is holding my further work on TAChart.
Such are the problems of using centralized version control ;-)
--
Alexander S. Klenin
Insight Experts Ltd.
___
23 matches
Mail list logo