On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Reenen Laurie wrote:
> > Just out of curiousity,
> > What if a component developer were to put only the interface part of his
> > units
> > in the unit, and write a library that contains the implementation (much like
> > Borland used to ship units like CRT back in the Turbo
> Just out of curiousity,
> What if a component developer were to put only the interface part of his units
> in the unit, and write a library that contains the implementation (much like
> Borland used to ship units like CRT back in the Turbo Pascal days), then use
> FP/Laz's ability to link to libr
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 18:13, zeljko wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 13:58, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, zeljko wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 11:29, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > For those that know TMS Software:
> > > >
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 13:58, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, zeljko wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 11:29, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > For those that know TMS Software:
> > >
> > > They have released their first component for FPC/Lazarus: Fl
> They have released their first component for FPC/Lazarus: Flexcel.
> http://www.tmssoftware.com/go/?flexcel
Ah, finally! :)
Actually FlexCel had supported FPC since a few years ago. I did
purchased it and personally encourage Adrian (the main author of this
component) to support FPC and Lazar
> Umm, does that also means that the commercial component writers would
> have to *always* sell you the full source code? I guess this is not
> so bad, we always bought delphi components that included full source
> code.
Just out of curiousity,
What if a component developer were to put only the
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [...]
> > The IDE does not recompile the LCL when installing a package.
> > That's why 'unit interfaces not found' is a FAQ.
>
> That may be so, but the 'Rebuild lazarus' is so prominently in the menu
> that I think it's often used...
And will
> Given my experience that all components I ever bought had bugs which
> I had to fix myself, you can imagine that I would never in my life buy
> components if I don't get the source code with it. So I don't see
> this as a problem.
This what Stallman had in his mind, introducing GNU and GPL.
AFA
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
> Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> >
> > > On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It will not work, and never will for Lazarus as long
Zitat von Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> > On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It will not work, and never will for Lazarus as long as it works with
> recompiling
> > > the IDE. I told the TMS peo
On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I doubt it, since you must recompile lazarus, and chances that it recompiles
> an LCL file are very close to 1...
This makes it very hard for commercial component writers then. I
guess all that remains for them, is to produce a bin
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I doubt it, since you must recompile lazarus, and chances that it recompiles
> > an LCL file are very close to 1...
>
> This makes it very hard for commercial component writer
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It will not work, and never will for Lazarus as long as it works with
> > recompiling
> > the IDE. I told the TMS people so: there is currently no workable solution.
> > As soon
On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It will not work, and never will for Lazarus as long as it works with
> recompiling
> the IDE. I told the TMS people so: there is currently no workable solution.
> As soon as someone recompiles the LCL, it's broken.
Even if the tria
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> They have released their first component for FPC/Lazarus: Flexcel.
>>
>> http://www.tmssoftware.com/go/?flexcel
>>
>> Depending on the feedback they get on this (I assume direct inquiries,
>> purchases
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, zeljko wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 11:29, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For those that know TMS Software:
> >
> > They have released their first component for FPC/Lazarus: Flexcel.
> >
> > http://www.tmssoftware.com/go/?flexcel
> > Depending on the f
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > They have released their first component for FPC/Lazarus: Flexcel.
> >
> > http://www.tmssoftware.com/go/?flexcel
> >
> > Depending on the feedback they get on this (I assume dir
On 9/17/08, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They have released their first component for FPC/Lazarus: Flexcel.
>
> http://www.tmssoftware.com/go/?flexcel
>
> Depending on the feedback they get on this (I assume direct inquiries,
> purchases or requests to port other component
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 11:29, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For those that know TMS Software:
>
> They have released their first component for FPC/Lazarus: Flexcel.
>
> http://www.tmssoftware.com/go/?flexcel
> Depending on the feedback they get on this (I assume direct inquiries,
> p
Hi,
For those that know TMS Software:
They have released their first component for FPC/Lazarus: Flexcel.
http://www.tmssoftware.com/go/?flexcel
Depending on the feedback they get on this (I assume direct inquiries,
purchases or requests to port other components), they may decide to port
other
20 matches
Mail list logo
