Hi Lazarus team,
I've two issues with a ComboBox (csDropDown) control in Windows:
1. ComboBox.AutoSelect:=false isn't working. I seems that Windows always
selects the whole ComboBox.Text at activation of the control.
2. Changing the ComboBox.Font (.Style, .Size or .Color) overwrites the
Comb
Maybe homebrew as well. I've heard from most people that brew is better
than ports.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, DougC via Lazarus wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:47:14 -0500 Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
wrote
And documented behaviour is what the language guide of Delphi states.
Is there such a language guide for the language features int
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:47:14 -0500 Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
wrote
And documented behaviour is what the language guide of Delphi states.
Is there such a language guide for the language features introduced in the last
10 years?
AFAIK t
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Martok via Lazarus wrote:
Am 19.02.2018 um 11:10 schrieb Sven Barth via Lazarus:
As long as the code does not rely on undocumented behavior, yes.
And therein lies the issue. Things that worked the same way for >25 years and
are mentioned explicitly in numerous secondary
Am 19.02.2018 um 11:10 schrieb Sven Barth via Lazarus:
> As long as the code does not rely on undocumented behavior, yes.
And therein lies the issue. Things that worked the same way for >25 years and
are mentioned explicitly in numerous secondary literature are considered
"undocumented". And whate
On 19.02.2018 13:51, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
If your code relies on implementation details, it won't always work
obviously.
But if you spot differences in behaviour, you can notify the devs.
There are
then 2 options:
- They try to fix the behaviour.
- They explain why it works
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Martok via Lazarus wrote:
Am 19.02.2018 um 00:18 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus:
Why is it obviously not true ? It's obviously not true that it is compatible
at the binary level. FPC does not produce the same binary code
I'm more talking about the macroscopic pe
Adriaan van Os via Lazarus wrote:
Any suggestions on where to download gtk2 binaries for OS X (e.g.
version 2.24) ?
To answer my own question, maybe MacPorts is the best source ?
Regards,
Adriaan van Os
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.laz
Any suggestions on where to download gtk2 binaries for OS X (e.g. version 2.24)
?
Thanks,
Adriaan van Os
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Am 19.02.2018 10:29 schrieb "Martok via Lazarus" <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>:
> But source code written for Delphi must compile in FPC.
Should it also do something *similar*?
As long as the code does not rely on undocumented behavior, yes.
Regards,
Sven
--
Am 19.02.2018 um 00:18 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus:
> Why is it obviously not true ? It's obviously not true that it is compatible
> at the binary level. FPC does not produce the same binary code
I'm more talking about the macroscopic perspective. Of course the binary code
may be differ
12 matches
Mail list logo