On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:26 PM Sven Barth via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> I've got a RFC for a feature that allows to extend the IDE. It's based
> on something that Delphi supports as well: Selection Editors.
>
I finally took a proper look at this. First remark without tes
Juha Manninen via lazarus schrieb am Di.,
31. März 2020, 13:40:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:26 PM Sven Barth via lazarus <
> lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
>
>> I've got a RFC for a feature that allows to extend the IDE. It's based
>> on something that Delphi supports as well: Selection E
I have a few changes for the ToDoList package.
A fair bit of refactoring and some new features. As a single patch file the
changes amount to almost 2800 lines.
Is it best submitted via the bug tracker as one large patch or a separate
patch per file in a compressed archive?
Regards
Kevin Jesshop
On 31.03.2020 14:33, Kevin Jesshope via lazarus wrote:
Is it best submitted via the bug tracker as one large patch or a
separate patch per file in a compressed archive?
Best is several patches separated by features and refactorings.
Ondrej
--
___
la
IMO the problem of Linux desktop (or at least "a" problem) is the lack of
backwards compatibility for pretty much anything above the X server (and
now with Wayland some people want to compromise that too). If you stick
with the X libraries, the C library (glibc is generally very good when it
comes
