Re: [Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-30 Thread Juha Manninen via Lazarus
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Werner Pamler via Lazarus wrote: > The Lazarus xml procedures are in package LazUtils which is a prerequisite > for, but not part of, LCL. So, you can use these procedures without adding a > requirement for LCL, LazUtils is sufficient. Exactly. The earlier Lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-30 Thread Werner Pamler via Lazarus
Am 30.07.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Michalis Kamburelis via Lazarus: I often read UTF8 XML files (like X3D, Collada 3D models). But I don't want the "core" CGE to depend on LCL The Lazarus xml procedures are in package LazUtils which is a prerequisite for, but not part of, LCL. So, you can use thes

Re: [Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-30 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Michalis Kamburelis via Lazarus wrote: > > I wonder if we can move the UTF8-based XML units to FPC, to be > available in the main FPC distribution too? (Possibly renamed like > Utf8_XMLXxx or such, instead of LazX_XMLXxx.) +1 However, a better name for the unit co

Re: [Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-30 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: > > The FPC units use UnicodeString (UTF16), the lazarus units use UTF8. > If the end result is used excluively in UTF8 strings, the lazarus version > may be > faster as there will be less conversions. Thank you. Marcos Doug

Re: [Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017, Michalis Kamburelis via Lazarus wrote: 2017-07-30 10:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus : On Sat, 29 Jul 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: Hi, Nowadays, we have full Unicode support in FPC. So, my question is: The units bellow is still neces

Re: [Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-30 Thread Michalis Kamburelis via Lazarus
2017-07-30 10:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus : > > > On Sat, 29 Jul 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Nowadays, we have full Unicode support in FPC. >> So, my question is: The units bellow is still necessary to use XML >> with Lazarus or we can use just

Re: [Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: Hi, Nowadays, we have full Unicode support in FPC. So, my question is: The units bellow is still necessary to use XML with Lazarus or we can use just the original provided by FCL? laz2_DOM laz2_XMLRead laz2_XMLWrite laz2_XMLCfg

Re: [Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-29 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: > Hi, > > Nowadays, we have full Unicode support in FPC. > So, my question is: The units bellow... below* Marcos Douglas -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https:

[Lazarus] FCL DOM [vs] laz2_DOM, and more

2017-07-29 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
Hi, Nowadays, we have full Unicode support in FPC. So, my question is: The units bellow is still necessary to use XML with Lazarus or we can use just the original provided by FCL? laz2_DOM laz2_XMLRead laz2_XMLWrite laz2_XMLCfg laz2_XMLUtils laz_XMLStreaming See here http://wiki.lazarus.freepasc