Re: [Lazarus] GIT sha1 vs svn numbers

2019-02-13 Thread Martin Frb via lazarus
This was meant to go to some one else. autocompletion of mail addresses -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] GIT sha1 vs svn numbers

2019-02-13 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus
On 13/02/2019 22:24, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote: > I looked at a few ideas, if something like the svn numbers could be > retained. Why would you want to shoehorn Git (a distributed version control system) into the way SubVersion (a client/server based version control system) works? They are fu

[Lazarus] GIT sha1 vs svn numbers

2019-02-13 Thread Martin Frb via lazarus
I looked at a few ideas, if something like the svn numbers could be retained. One approach would be to have a tag on each commit. That would mean that r54123 would be a replacement for the sha1 in almost all (if not all)  situations. Not tested, but likely that the server can add the tags, whe