On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:24 PM Martin Frb via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> It is also acceptable to have a "mixed license". E.g.
>Licensed [L]GPL 2 [OR: "2 or later"] or MIT at the users choice.
>Anyone using/modifying this code must keep at least either one of the
>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:24 PM Martin Frb via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> On 15/12/2021 12:53, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via lazarus <
> lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
>
>> what licenses are accepted
On 15/12/2021 12:53, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via lazarus
wrote:
what licenses are accepted by the Lazarus project ?
MIT ? GPL v2 ? GPL v3 ?
The Lazarus IDE itself is GPL v2. Most packages are LGPL v2.
If your utili
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> what licenses are accepted by the Lazarus project ?
>MIT ? GPL v2 ? GPL v3 ?
>
The Lazarus IDE itself is GPL v2. Most packages are LGPL v2.
If your utility is to be installed into t
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via lazarus wrote:
Hi,
currently I'm writing a utility which I would like to be included in
Lazarus and / or FPC ( if it accepted of course ).
Usually I license my open source software under MIT license ( see PS
). After reading some forum
Hi,
currently I'm writing a utility which I would like to be included in
Lazarus and / or FPC ( if it accepted of course ).
Usually I license my open source software under MIT license ( see PS
). After reading some forum threads regarding licenses I am a little
lost . So I ask, what lice