[Lazarus] A few hacky patches (resent)

G'day all, Just for information I've attached some patches I apply to my local tree and use in an application I'm working on. These are not any form of an example of how to write good code, they are gross hacks that have "evolved" as lazarus has evolved over the last 9 months or so and I adapt

Re: [Lazarus] Dragging documented

Tom Verhoeff schrieb: Keep It Simple, S.. Don't try to cover all possibilities at once, but break it down by what is minimally relevant, and document variants separately. Simplification without over-simplification is the problem :-( DoDi ___

Re: [Lazarus] patches

2009/5/19 Brad Campbell : > Oh well, I posted some patches to the list for info / comment but the e-mail > was rejected by mods with no reason given.. guess I'll keep maintaining them > myself then.. best attach them to an issue in mantis, which has the added benefit that they won't be forgotten.

Re: [Lazarus] Dragging documented

2009/5/19 Hans-Peter Diettrich : >>> I've started documentation about dragging, with the first part >>> (drag-drop) here: >>> >> > Do you want to add it to the wiki? the chart is already in the wiki. Please update it, according to your knowledge.

Re: [Lazarus] patches

On Tue, 19 May 2009, Brad Campbell wrote: Oh well, I posted some patches to the list for info / comment but the e-mail was rejected by mods with no reason given.. guess I'll keep maintaining them myself then.. Most likely they were simply too big ? Michael. ___

Re: [Lazarus] patches

Brad Campbell schreef: Oh well, I posted some patches to the list for info / comment but the e-mail was rejected by mods with no reason given.. guess I'll keep maintaining them myself then.. I thought the reason was added: The total size was too big: over 40 kB. With kind regards, Vincent

[Lazarus] patches

Oh well, I posted some patches to the list for info / comment but the e-mail was rejected by mods with no reason given.. guess I'll keep maintaining them myself then.. -- Dolphins are so intelligent that within a few weeks they can train Americans to stand at the edge of the pool and throw them

Re: [Lazarus] Dragging documented

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:35:42PM +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: > Tom Verhoeff schrieb: > >>> I've started documentation about dragging, with the first part >>> (drag-drop) here: >>> >> >> It would be helpful to include a Message Sequence C

Re: [Lazarus] Dragging documented

Tom Verhoeff schrieb: I've started documentation about dragging, with the first part (drag-drop) here: It would be helpful to include a Message Sequence Chart or UML Sequence Diagram, visualizing which objects and methods are involved in what

Re: [Lazarus] Dragging documented

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:48:51PM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2009 10:34:40 +0200 > Tom Verhoeff wrote: > > > It would be helpful to include a Message Sequence Chart or UML > > Sequence Diagram, visualizing which objects and methods are involved > > in what order. > > > > So

Re: [Lazarus] Component doesn't look the same in design time as in runtime

It is a descendant of TCustomControl. <<< 19.5.2009 14:52 - dmitry boyarintsev "skalogryz.li...@gmail.com" >>> db> Judging from the last screenshots, custom tab control is db> TGraphicControl? or is it TCustomControl? -- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk

Re: [Lazarus] Component doesn't look the same in design time as in runtime

Judging from the last screenshots, custom tab control is TGraphicControl? or is it TCustomControl? thanks, dmitry ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Component doesn't look the same in design time as in runtime

Hello Mattias, Look at these screenshots. Thanks. TRoland; <<< 19.5.2009 13:23 - Mattias Gaertner "nc-gaert...@netcologne.de" >>> MG> On Tue, 19 May 2009 13:14:48 +0200 MG> Roland Turcan wrote: >> Hello Lazarus mailing list! >> >> What is the difference, that components doesn't contains any

Re: [Lazarus] Component doesn't look the same in design time as in runtime

On Tue, 19 May 2009 21:44:24 +0930 Samps wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2009 08:53:54 pm Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > Mac OS X 10.5.6, Carbon, Laz&FPC SVN. > > > > Can you give more details? A screenshot? > > > Sorry if you get two of this one, accidentally sent it from unsubbed > account... > > >

Re: [Lazarus] Component doesn't look the same in design time as in runtime

On Tue, 19 May 2009 08:53:54 pm Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > Mac OS X 10.5.6, Carbon, Laz&FPC SVN. > > Can you give more details? A screenshot? > Sorry if you get two of this one, accidentally sent it from unsubbed account... I've got an example: A radiogroup with some items. The size of the ra

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Data Desktop questions

On Tue, 19 May 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi Michael, I decided to ask the questions in the mailing list, seeing that LazDataDesktop is shipped with Lazarus (instead of emailing you directly). That way, if others are using LazDataDesktop, they can comment if they wish. * What is the bes

Re: [Lazarus] Dragging documented

On Tue, 19 May 2009 10:34:40 +0200 Tom Verhoeff wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 01:56:54AM +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: > > I've started documentation about dragging, with the first part > > (drag-drop) here: > > > > It would be helpful

Re: [Lazarus] Component doesn't look the same in design time as in runtime

On Tue, 19 May 2009 13:14:48 +0200 Roland Turcan wrote: > Hello Lazarus mailing list! > > What is the difference, that components doesn't contains any > difference in the code about painting in design time and runtime, but > it looks different. > > Mac OS X 10.5.6, Carbon, Laz&FPC SVN. Can you

[Lazarus] Component doesn't look the same in design time as in runtime

Hello Lazarus mailing list! What is the difference, that components doesn't contains any difference in the code about painting in design time and runtime, but it looks different. Mac OS X 10.5.6, Carbon, Laz&FPC SVN. Thanks. -- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotu

[Lazarus] Lazarus Data Desktop questions

Hi Michael, I decided to ask the questions in the mailing list, seeing that LazDataDesktop is shipped with Lazarus (instead of emailing you directly). That way, if others are using LazDataDesktop, they can comment if they wish. * What is the best way to extend the "export as source" dialog. I se

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus users in South Africa

Since, your guys are offtoping about children. I was thinking how cool would it be, to name a kid after FPC or Lazarus team member? Florian is first name in the list :) ...ok... please don't take it seriously. ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.laza

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus users in South Africa

Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto: On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Dave Coventry wrote: Graeme, you know you're not. :-) I know, but I feel lonely seeing only my single pin in the Google Map, when I know there are others in RSA. How was your trip to PE over Christmas? Did your bike

[Lazarus] SVN IDE Plugin.

Hi all, i tried the SVN plugin today for the first time and i noticed that the plugin doesn't work with the lfm files (at least for me). For example that if i made a change in the form associated with the opened pas file in the editor, the svn plugin doesn't commit the lfm file changes.

Re: [Lazarus] Dragging documented

On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 01:56:54AM +0200, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: > I've started documentation about dragging, with the first part > (drag-drop) here: > It would be helpful to include a Message Sequence Chart or UML Sequence Diagram, visualiz

Re: [Lazarus] User defined color schemes in IDE

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > And for those color blind and non-arty developers (most of us really) > or somebody that just doesn't have a clue what colors go nicely > together. The following website has loads of color palettes that show > colors that complement each

Re: [Lazarus] User defined color schemes in IDE

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > Some color schemes I like: And to give others some more ideas Here is a whole bunch of them. http://www.hanselman.com/blog/VisualStudioProgrammerThemesGallery.aspx Overall, I'm a "black background" guy. White backgrounds are just

Re: [Lazarus] User defined color schemes in IDE

> Some color schemes I like: > >  * My own one as seen in the screenshots at > http://wiki.freepascal.org/New_IDE_features_since >  * Humane at > http://damieng.com/blog/2007/10/14/colour-schemes-for-visual-studio >  * Distant Shores at > http://winterdom.com/2008/03/distantshoresavisualstudiocolo

[Lazarus] User defined color schemes in IDE

Hi, The IDE already supports color schemes (Default, Twilight, Delphi, Ocean, etc...). Could we can also customize the schemes to suit our needs. This is the first thing I do after a new lazarus profile has been created. Why can't we save our color schemes to file so they appear in the "color sc