Without knowing to much about the compiler internals... Wouldn't a SHA1
be a better option than CRC? For example, Git uses SHA1's to
cryptographically ensure that no revision in the repository has been
tampered with. Just a single byte change generates a completely
different SHA1.
isn't
Is there a reason, why the Lazarus IDE is using groupboxes with normal
font as well as a combination of bevels and label with bold font for
groupbox functionality?
For ex. IDE Options - Environment vs. IDE Options - Editor.
It think this doesn't look consistent.
I vote for using TGroupBox with
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 06:51:21PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Could be. Due to tex4ht, you probably can't rely on the filename though, so
you would have to index the anchors in all files, and then fixup the
references.
I'll see if I can spend some time on this the coming days.
Done,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:14:12PM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
[...]
Btw, there is a new kid in town: ParallelSort.
This uses a parallel mergesort and automatically uses several
threads. See here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Parallel_procedures#Example:_parallel_sort
