On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
OK, let me try and sum up this message thread. We have the following
technologies/projects/options available:
* FCL-Web
* fpWeb
They are the same thing. fpWeb is a unit in fcl-web.
* jQuery
* Gecko/XULRunner
* ExtJS
* ExtPas
* ExtPascal -
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
set the trends. After 1 day of testing the differences in IE and
Firefox already drove me mad :(
Exactly my issue.
My boss was actually very surprised that there are no standards
in web development. It is not what he was told by other people :-)
Gee wiz, where
Matt Shaffer wrote:
Right, but what I meant was if someone manages to upload their own PHP
file to the lazarus server, they can easily have uploaded a PHP file
manager which has the capability of deleting files, etc, without ever
needing ssh/ftp (this assumes the attack was done through a
Hello friends,
It started to show this %subject% since I added some code into
{$IF MyBoolCondition}
example:
{$MODE Delphi}
Unit MyUnit;
interface
Uses MyConditions;
{$IF MyCond}
//some declaration
implementation
// some code
{$ELSE}
//some declaration
implementation
// some code
Hello friends and Dmitry,
Does anybody know about not working TCalendar on Carbon? It doesn't
react on click events.
BTW: How can I search in bug tracker if this bug is already reported?
--
Best regards, TRoland
http://www.rotursoft.sk
http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk
--
Roland Turcan schreef:
Hello friends,
It started to show this %subject% since I added some code into
Please, send responses to the fpc-pascal list.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Roland Turcan k...@rotursoft.sk wrote:
BTW: How can I search in bug tracker if this bug is already reported?
please report the bug.
thanks,
dmitry
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Am 27.01.2010 17:30, schrieb Bee Jay:
Take a look at HaXe (haxe.org) - HaXe is a dynamic but type safe
programming language, which is much better suited for Web programming
than ExtPascal (in my opinion).
I've heard about it and wasn't interested since it doesn't support
pascal. :P
there
Hello all,
It seems that make clean isn´t cleaning the source correctly. After
issuing the command i still have a lot of files in output dirs, like
lazarus\units\i386-win32 or components output dir too.
Is this right ?
Regards,
Marcelo.
PS: Using Lazarus svn win32.
--
I use:
- pascal and HaXe/Neko for the server
- HaXe for the rest
Why should I learn another new language while I could do all those
things in pascal? Except for using external existing JS library.
That's why I'm very interested with what Michael, Joost and Mattias
doing currently.
because
El jue, 28-01-2010 a las 13:56 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
I use pascal since 30 years for my every day development
and love it - but IMHO for web programming, it is more productive to
have a dynamic language - it is the nature of websites
That could be true (not in my case) if you
Adrian Veith wrote:
environments - I use pascal since 30 years for my every day development
and love it - but IMHO for web programming, it is more productive to
have a dynamic language - it is the nature of websites. (Free)-Pascal
A matter of taste I guess. I use pure Object Pascal to write
Paul Ishenin wrote:
Is this right ?
try make bigideclean
Yuck! :-)
When is FPC and Lazarus getting rid of Makefiles? Wasn't the whole idea of
fpmake to remove the usage of Makefiles once and for all? Makefiles are so
C/C++ style. :-/
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a
try make bigideclean
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
Still not work.
The main outdir at lazarus/units/ has a lot of .lfm files. Some components
have files like .o, .compiled, .ppu
Regards,
Marcelo.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Marcelo B de Paula wrote:
Still not work.
The main outdir at lazarus/units/ has a lot of .lfm files. Some components
have files like .o, .compiled, .ppu
Are you using the SubVersion or Git repository of Lazarus? If the latter,
then use 'git clean' instead of the 'make' command. This will
W dniu 2010-01-28 14:22, Graeme Geldenhuys pisze:
Adrian Veith wrote:
environments - I use pascal since 30 years for my every day development
and love it - but IMHO for web programming, it is more productive to
have a dynamic language - it is the nature of websites. (Free)-Pascal
A
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Adrian Veith wrote:
because Pascal is not as well suited for dynamic languages and
environments -
Do you mean scripting languages like JavaScript? If this is the case
than you
Hello lazarus project!
How can I manipulate the default font for the application during
application startup as in the past in CLX's TApplication.Font.
I want to avoid of setting for all components on all forms in project
an exact font, but to manipulate it from central point.
Thanks for all
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 08:57:56AM -0600, Andrew Brunner wrote:
because Pascal is not as well suited for dynamic languages and
environments -
Do you mean scripting languages like JavaScript? If this is the case
than you should know that there are pascal based scripting utilities
for
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
My boss was actually very surprised that there are no standards
in web development. It is not what he was told by other people :-)
There are standards from W3C and even a validator: http://validator.w3.org/
But
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
A matter of taste I guess. I use pure Object Pascal to write all our CGI
applications. Our CGI apps do things PHP, JavaScript etc can only dream of!
Not to mention I have the full RTL, lots of the FCL and other
El jue, 28-01-2010 a las 13:37 -0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
escribió:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
A matter of taste I guess. I use pure Object Pascal to write all our CGI
applications. Our CGI apps do things PHP, JavaScript etc can
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
My boss was actually very surprised that there are no standards
in web development. It is not what he was told by other people :-)
There are standards
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
El jue, 28-01-2010 a las 13:37 -0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
escribió:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
A matter of taste I guess. I use pure Object Pascal to write all our CGI
applications.
ik schrieb:
On X-Server you can have custom made mouse cursors that can be loaded in
an on demand situations.
This should be common to most platforms.
That's what I wish to have, the icon of the mouse cursor itself as
loaded into X-Server . So its the associated icon to the specific window.
Was the php shell C99madshell?
It seems many sites have been recently compromised via this shell. The
ways the shell is uploaded depends on the vulnerabilities of the forum
software.
Marc Weustink wrote:
Matt Shaffer wrote:
Right, but what I meant was if someone manages to upload their
It's not like Morfik - to write an wrapper, for an existing JS library
is a matter of one or two hours - I did it for Google-Maps and JQuery.
Have you tried to write a wrapper for ExtJS or any other advanced JS
library that provides advanced UI widgets with server side data
binding, not
On 28 January 2010 17:37, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
...snip...
what has put me off from cgi ... I usually have a lot more HTML then
code, so I actually would like to have a HTML document where I put
In our case it is the opposite. We have a LOT more OP
On 28 January 2010 20:55, Bee Jay bee.ogra...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the problem of pascal nor cgi, it's the problem of your coding
style and management. Use templates, MVC or MVP, separate logic from UI,
etc. I think you should have known all those things. :)
100% correct. We have a
On 1/28/2010 02:55, Matt Shaffer wrote:
Right, but what I meant was if someone manages to upload their own PHP
file to the lazarus server, they can easily have uploaded a PHP file
manager which has the capability of deleting files, etc, without ever
needing ssh/ftp (this assumes the attack was
On 1/28/2010 08:24, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Paul Ishenin wrote:
Is this right ?
try make bigideclean
Yuck! :-)
When is FPC and Lazarus getting rid of Makefiles? Wasn't the whole idea of
fpmake to remove the usage of Makefiles once and for all? Makefiles are so
C/C++ style. :-/
hunh???
On 1/28/2010 08:53, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Another Makefile issue:
---
Say I'm on revision X and I've built my lazarus and LCL. Now I get an
update, which removes or renames some components. I gather the Makefile has
also updated accordingly. So if I now do a 'make
On 1/29/2010 01:35, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
waldo kitty wrote:
hunh??? don't you mean ASM style? i've used make files for at least 20+ years
and mostly for my ASM stuff way back [t|w]hen ;P
Either way, the point is still the same: they are simply *not* Object
Pascal style!
:) :P spoil
waldo kitty wrote:
:) :P spoil sport! :P :P :) :lol:
;-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
34 matches
Mail list logo
