Re: [Lazarus] Writing a custom lazarus dropdown control

On 08/06/2011 20:45, Erwin van den Bosch wrote: > You are right. But I stripped down the component. Removed a lot of code > to make it easier to focus on the essential parts of this component. Ah, that would explain it. :-) > What I need is a way to: ...snip... That is exactly how I implemente

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

2011/6/8 Florian Klaempfl : > Am 07.06.2011 20:43, schrieb Mattias Gaertner: >>> mac os <> darwin, >>> darwin is Mac OS X (unix like), macos is Mac OS before version 10, >>> which ran on the m68k. > > ... and PowerPC. > Of course. I did not mention that to make the distinction with Mac OS X (darwin

Re: [Lazarus] Writing a custom lazarus dropdown control

Op 8-6-2011 20:21, Graeme Geldenhuys schreef: Unfortunately I can't commend on LCL, but I can say it would be rather easy to implement in fpGUI. I think it should be quipe doable in LCL too. Graeme, I don't know much about fpGui. I will look at fpGui. Issues with your component: Running the s

Re: [Lazarus] Writing a custom lazarus dropdown control

2011/6/8 Erwin van den Bosch : > It uses some windows specific calls. I need some help to convert/rewrite it > under Lazarus. I would be very happy if I can get it to work under Windows > and Linux but for now Windows only is good enough. Unfortunately I can't commend on LCL, but I can say it woul

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

Am 07.06.2011 20:43, schrieb Mattias Gaertner: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:36:57 +0200 > Vincent Snijders wrote: > >> 2011/6/7 Mattias Gaertner : >>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:02:30 +0200 >>> Vincent Snijders wrote: >>> [...] So win32, win64, wince, os2 and macos (not macosx). >>> >>> I implem

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

On 08.06.2011 10:30, Henry Vermaak wrote: On 08/06/11 09:16, Michael Schnell wrote: - why is it auto-set in Linux ? I believe Mattias fixed this, now. - Is it _necessary_ when compiling for Windows ? It depends if you want a console created with your app. There is a subsystem type somewhe

Re: [Lazarus] Little interface improvement (i think so...)

There's a brazilian mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/lazarus-br 2011/6/8 William Oliveira Ferreira : > I Don´t know if someone agrees if me, i think dock the Messages window into > the Source Editor Window is a nice idea as it makes it easier to  manage. > Just place on the same Windo

Re: [Lazarus] How to PostMessage to object?

Ok, I did not notice that exists method TApplication.RemoveAsyncCalls(const AnObject: TObject). Anyway it's strange that AnObject param is compared to Data param from QueueAsyncCall, not to AMethod, but this is not a problem. 2011/6/8 Krzysztof > Ok, this can be done with critical section but wh

Re: [Lazarus] How to PostMessage to object?

Ok, this can be done with critical section but what with AV scenario? Example: 1. Thread add queue calling Application.QueueAsyncCall(MyObj.EventMethod, 0); 2. MyObj is destroyed by main thread 3. Main thread process messages and try call queue added by thread but reference to MyObj.EventMethod was

Re: [Lazarus] Little interface improvement (i think so...)

Good, i'll read it later... Thanks! William de Oliveira Ferreira Bacharel em Sistemas de Informação 2011/6/8 leledumbo > I guess you haven't seen: > 1) http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Anchor_Docking#Docking_in_the_IDE > 2) http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.or

[Lazarus] Writing a custom lazarus dropdown control

Hello group, I'm trying to convert some Delphi component to Lazarus. But without much success. It's an Edit control with buttons in it and a dropdown panel. Just like a combobox. I use this component for creating date selection controls and custom lookup comboboxes. It uses some windows spec

Re: [Lazarus] Little interface improvement (i think so...)

I guess you haven't seen: 1) http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Anchor_Docking#Docking_in_the_IDE 2) http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/New_IDE_features_since#Docked_IDE 3) http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Manual_Docker *older hack, don't know if it still works -- View this message in context:

Re: [Lazarus] Little interface improvement (i think so...)

You can use ManualDock components for dock messages to source editor: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Manual_Docker Or just use AnchorDockingDsgn/EasyDockMgrDsgn from Packages->Configure installed packages 2011/6/8 William Oliveira Ferreira >

Re: [Lazarus] How to PostMessage to object?

On 08/06/11 16:28, Krzysztof wrote: Hm, I forgot about Application.QueueAsyncCall. And this can be safely call from thread without TThread.Synchronize() ? Because I don't want use Synchronize() in any part of thread code. So this is correct code? : procedure TMyThread.Execute; begin // Ap

Re: [Lazarus] How to PostMessage to object?

Hm, I forgot about Application.QueueAsyncCall. And this can be safely call from thread without TThread.Synchronize() ? Because I don't want use Synchronize() in any part of thread code. So this is correct code? : procedure TMyThread.Execute; begin // Application.QueueAsyncCall(@SomeObj.TestMe

[Lazarus] Little interface improvement (i think so...)

I Don´t know if someone agrees if me, i think dock the Messages window into the Source Editor Window is a nice idea as it makes it easier to manage. Just place on the same Window, aligned to bottom. Sorry about my english, sometimes i need Google to write messages =/ _

Re: [Lazarus] How to PostMessage to object?

On 06/08/2011 04:57 PM, Krzysztof wrote: How can I PostMessage from thread to another object? While "PostMessage()" and "Procedure...Message" is available with Lazarus, you better use the non-Windowish Application.QueueAsyncCall() procedure. BTW.: with Delphi, you mostly better user TThread.Q

[Lazarus] How to PostMessage to object?

Hi, How can I PostMessage from thread to another object? PostMessage/SendMessage need HWND as parameter but this kind of handle is only in visual controls (TWinControl, TForm). I temporary can use TWinControl type instead of TObject but it need parent window to handle messages. Exists any cross pl

Re: [Lazarus] Presentation of Portuguese Comunity of Lazarus

This community is principally for users of Lazarus from Portugal. But we haven't any proble accepting that the users wite text in hour site in Brazillian portuguese. This is the same language, just change the dialect. Em 08-06-2011 14:57, Paulo Malheiros escreveu: On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 22:52 -0

[Lazarus] Dynamic loading of a custom sqlite library

Hi, I encountered problems using dynamically loaded sqlite library with lazarus on linux. My post about this in the sqlite list is here: http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg61565.html Maybe someone points me to the right direction It's about loading sqlite library with dlopen,

[Lazarus] found a new mono font for use with Lazarus

Hi, I'm a huge fan of the Raize bitmap font. I used it for years in Delphi. I was such a fan, than when I moved to Linux some years back, I hand painted that font to make it available under Linux too. http://www.raize.com/DevTools/Tools/RzFont.asp Anyway, today I was admiring the beautiful Ubu

Re: [Lazarus] Patch for fpVectorial

On 2011-06-08 15:55:11 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > > Great, now the color works. But the PenWidth doesn't seems to be > > working. > > This should be fixed in rev17694 > Excellent!, now it works ok. -- Leonardo M. Ramé h

Re: [Lazarus] Presentation of Portuguese Comunity of Lazarus

On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 22:52 -0300, Marcelo Borges de Paula wrote: > I won´t restart this discussion again. > Refer to: > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2011-January/060070.html > > Other portugueses made their point then. > So, in the same manner, to not confuse people with

Re: [Lazarus] Patch for fpVectorial

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > Great, now the color works. But the PenWidth doesn't seems to be > working. This should be fixed in rev17694 -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.fr

Re: [Lazarus] Debugging problem

Hello Martin, Thanks you were faster than me, I was just going to reproduce. Can you fix and commit it into svn? TRoland; <<< 08.06.2011 15:08 - Martin "laza...@mfriebe.de" >>> M> Ok, I can reproduce. M> Mac GdB outputs an extra line ^error" M> which is the problem M> On 08/06/2011 13:4

Re: [Lazarus] Vers[?]o : Compiler messages

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:48:29 -0300 > Marcos Douglas wrote: > > > Hi, > > Just one my projects is trying exhibit messages in "Unicode". See > > attachments. > > What option I broke in the Lazarus? > > What fpc version? What lazarus versio

Re: [Lazarus] Patch for fpVectorial

On 2011-06-08 15:05:45 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > Your code is wrong, because Vec.StartPath creates a new path. > Previously it didn't erase the color, but now it does. Try this order > of calls: > > Vec.StartPath(0, 0); > Vec.SetPenColor(lClYellow); // <--- after StartPat

Re: [Lazarus] Debugging problem

Ok, I can reproduce. Mac GdB outputs an extra line ^error" which is the problem On 08/06/2011 13:47, Martin wrote: On 08/06/2011 13:45, Roland Turcan wrote: Hello all, This error occurs in non-threaded code as well. What happens , if you power off the "history" window? Yes I know, it

Re: [Lazarus] Patch for fpVectorial

Your code is wrong, because Vec.StartPath creates a new path. Previously it didn't erase the color, but now it does. Try this order of calls: Vec.StartPath(0, 0); Vec.SetPenColor(lClYellow); // <--- after StartPath Vec.SetPenWidth(1); Vec.AddLineToPath(100, 100); Vec.EndPath();

Re: [Lazarus] Patch for fpVectorial

On 2011-06-08 14:46:36 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > > Sorry, I use the fpvectorial package from fpc trunk, which is now on rev > > 17692. Where is rev1666? is it from another repository?. > > Yes, it is from the lazarus-ccr

Re: [Lazarus] Debugging problem

On 08/06/2011 13:45, Roland Turcan wrote: Hello all, This error occurs in non-threaded code as well. What happens , if you power off the "history" window? Yes I know, it isn't convenient, as their is no persistent setting... but the issue needs to be fixed in the threads code, anyway... For

Re: [Lazarus] Patch for fpVectorial

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > Sorry, I use the fpvectorial package from fpc trunk, which is now on rev > 17692. Where is rev1666? is it from another repository?. Yes, it is from the lazarus-ccr where I develop unstable features. But I merged all changes in rev17693 to

Re: [Lazarus] Debugging problem

Hello all, This error occurs in non-threaded code as well. TRoland; <<< 08.06.2011 13:54 - Roland Turcan "k...@rotursoft.sk" >>> RT> Hello all, RT> I have FPC r17690 and Lazarus r31132 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 with all RT> updates and I cannot debug any thread, it crashes on debugger error: RT> The

Re: [Lazarus] Patch for fpVectorial

On 2011-06-08 08:16:29 +0200, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: > > I added a couple of lines to fpvtocanvas.pas to apply those settings. In > > my project the patch works as I expect. > > Your code applies the path color in stMoveTo, whi

Re: [Lazarus] Debugging problem

On 08/06/2011 12:54, Roland Turcan wrote: Hello all, I have FPC r17690 and Lazarus r31132 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 with all updates and I cannot debug any thread, it crashes on debugger error: The GDB command: "-thread-info" returned the error: ",msg="Undefined mi command: thread-info (missing implem

[Lazarus] Debugging problem

Hello all, I have FPC r17690 and Lazarus r31132 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 with all updates and I cannot debug any thread, it crashes on debugger error: The GDB command: "-thread-info" returned the error: ",msg="Undefined mi command: thread-info (missing implementation)"" What can I do? Thanks in advan

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

Hans-Peter Diettrich hat am 8. Juni 2011 um 12:37 geschrieben: > Mattias Gaertner schrieb: > > >  > > Anyway the IDE now sets the parameter only for those OS that > >  > > supports the -WG. > >  > Is this done by the actually selected Widget Set ? > > > >  > > > > No, of course not.

Re: [Lazarus] IDE docking flaw?

Mattias Gaertner schrieb: BTW the SimpleLayout should *not* remember the bounds of *docked* forms, instead it should retain their *undocked* bounds, for use when such a form is undocked later. That's just my preference: When a form is undocked it should not move. You can send me a patch to m

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

Mattias Gaertner schrieb: > > Anyway the IDE now sets the parameter only for those OS that > > supports the -WG. > Is this done by the actually selected Widget Set ? No, of course not. It is done depending on the target OS. IMO FPC knows much better about platforms, and should ignore

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

Michael Schnell hat am 8. Juni 2011 um 11:20 geschrieben: > On 06/08/2011 10:29 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > Anyway the IDE now sets the parameter only for those OS that > > supports the -WG. > Is this done by the actually selected Widget Set ?   No, of course not. It is done depending

Re: [Lazarus] RE : RE : broken scrollbars under Ubuntu 11.04

On 6/7/11, Andrew Brunner wrote: > So much is broken under 11.04 that I don't use it. TCustomEdit.KeyPress is broken too in this distro. Maybe there is some underlying flaw in our GTK2 widgetset? Bart -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

On 06/08/2011 10:29 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: Anyway the IDE now sets the parameter only for those OS that supports the -WG. Is this done by the actually selected Widget Set ? So that a project done in one OS (using the default Widget Type) can be just compiled in the other one (the IDE auto

Re: [Lazarus] New application type: HTTP standalone server

On 06/07/2011 02:41 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: I want to see if we can integrate it in a TCustomApplication descendent (TEventApplication), of which the LCL TApplication can be made a descendent. If so, then the NOGUI widget type will automatically have an event loop and timer. Sounds nice !

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:43:34 +0200 Vincent Snijders wrote: > 2011/6/8 Mattias Gaertner : > > > > Yes, the "Win32" is a bit misleading. > > It's interesting that the fpc -h does not even mention the parameter. > > > > For me it does. > vincent@fpclin32:~/src/fpc/trunk$ compiler/ppc386 -h | grep WG

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

2011/6/8 Mattias Gaertner : > > Yes, the "Win32" is a bit misleading. > It's interesting that the fpc -h does not even mention the parameter. > For me it does. vincent@fpclin32:~/src/fpc/trunk$ compiler/ppc386 -h | grep WG -WGSpecify graphic type application (EMX, OS/2, Windows) Vin

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

On 08/06/11 09:16, Michael Schnell wrote: - why is it auto-set in Linux ? I believe Mattias fixed this, now. - Is it _necessary_ when compiling for Windows ? It depends if you want a console created with your app. There is a subsystem type somewhere in the PE header that tells windows if

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:16:11 +0200 Michael Schnell wrote: > On 06/07/2011 03:39 PM, silvioprog wrote: > > Someone using FPC 2.5.1 and Laz 0.9.31 on Linux is experiencing this > > problem? > > > > Do not know if the same happens in Windows, but ... > It's a linker parameter saying: "Win32 GUI app

Re: [Lazarus] Illegal parameter: -WG

On 06/07/2011 03:39 PM, silvioprog wrote: Someone using FPC 2.5.1 and Laz 0.9.31 on Linux is experiencing this problem? Do not know if the same happens in Windows, but ... It's a linker parameter saying: "Win32 GUI application". With a Linux project I just uncecked the appropriate box and it c

[Lazarus] TGraphicControl changes

Hi all, I just changed behaviour of TGraphicControl.Update (overrided TControl.Update) in r31132 so it does not request paint over whole parent handle, but just invalidates clientrect of TGraphicControl. If someone rely on TGraphicControl.Update and expect that it'll request paint over complete