Thank you very much for all of your help Martin, I have my unit
compiling properly and learned some new do's and don'ts. I'm now
looking forward to the hopefully not too painful process of working in
code folding and auto-complete in to the editor. Should be fun. ;)
Anyway, just wanted to say tha
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 15:20 +0200, Bart wrote:
> On 7/9/11, David Riley wrote:
>
> > I've done some experimenting with just the highlighter unit and an empty
> > project, and when I removed the {$I synedit.inc} line from the
> > highlighter (I'm currently using none of the defines in the file any
On 17 July 2011 16:31, leledumbo wrote:
> Lazarus' makefile is different from FPC, it expects LAZARUS_INSTALL_DIR
> instead of INSTALL_PREFIX for installation location
>
>
I use INSTALL_PREFIX on LInux and it works every time.
Does the Tools | Build IDE create a batch file that can be run step
On 17 July 2011 16:58, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> Ok.
> What directory I will should downloading the sources, fpc\doc? This
> directory is created after a make command... or can be any directory
> I want?
Any directory, because if you do the 'make' for the fpcdocs you
specify the path the the FPC s
2011/7/17 Frank Church :
>
> What of the installation phase, when you have to copy the Lazarus build to
> the location of your choice, which is not c:\lazarus?
These scripts won't "install" FPC/Lazarus, but they both work fine after.
You can change the path to something do you want... of course!
I
On 7/17/11, Frank Church wrote:
> What of the installation phase, when you have to copy the Lazarus build to
> the location of your choice, which is not c:\lazarus?
Well I have a simple setup:
I do not use snapshots for Lazarus.
I only have the sources.
I installed Fpc (currently 2.4.4) from bin
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 14:05:11 +0100
Frank Church wrote:
>[...]
> > > Unable to find file "staticpackages.nc"
>[...]
> > > staticpackages.inc is right where it normally is, and it even gets
> > updated
> > > during the compilation process with duplicates added by the zeos package
> > I
> > > am try
Lazarus' makefile is different from FPC, it expects LAZARUS_INSTALL_DIR
instead of INSTALL_PREFIX for installation location
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Building-Lazarus-for-Windows-tp3174724p3176979.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Laza
On 17 July 2011 15:57, Bart wrote:
> You must be doing something wrong then.
>
> * Assuming fpc binaries and binutils are in %path%
> * After updating the sources from svn:
>
> cd \path_to_lazarus_sources
> make clean all OPT='-gl'
>
> that should be all.
> (Then in Lazarus IDE set compiler to th
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 17 July 2011 00:52, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> Where do I find the README.DOCS file?
>> I use http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_2_4 and there
>> is no README.DOCS.
>>
>
> Where were talking about the FPC docs repository (
You must be doing something wrong then.
* Assuming fpc binaries and binutils are in %path%
* After updating the sources from svn:
cd \path_to_lazarus_sources
make clean all OPT='-gl'
that should be all.
(Then in Lazarus IDE set compiler to the same one you used to build
Lazarus, or things go wro
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> Where do I find the README.DOCS file?
>> I use http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_2_4 and there
>> is no README.DOCS.
>
> The documentation is in a separa
Hi all,
If you use the translations unit to translate unit resources strings,
then (even after stripping all debug info and using smart linking etc)
this will add about 1 Mb to the executable size.
This seems due to the fact that the
function ConvertEncoding(const s, FromEncoding, ToEncoding: str
Ludo Brands wrote:
If I understand things correctly "User Mode Emulation" (which
I've not
played with) allows you to run e.g. an ARM Linux program on a
PC Linux
host, while "Full System Emulation" allows you to emulate an entire
computer.
Correct. Downside is that you need all the arm li
On 17 July 2011 13:14, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:57:27 +0100
> Frank Church wrote:
>
> > I am trying to rebuild my IDE when a whole component's directory
> vanished. I
> > am not sure if I deleted by accident.
> >
> > When I restore the source and try to recompile it, I ge
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:57:27 +0100
Frank Church wrote:
> I am trying to rebuild my IDE when a whole component's directory vanished. I
> am not sure if I deleted by accident.
>
> When I restore the source and try to recompile it, I get this error.
>
> Unable to find file "staticpackages.nc"
> >
I am trying to rebuild my IDE when a whole component's directory vanished. I
am not sure if I deleted by accident.
When I restore the source and try to recompile it, I get this error.
Unable to find file "staticpackages.nc"
> if it belongs to your project, check search path in
> Project-Compiler
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:43:16 +0100
Frank Church wrote:
> In relation to the earlier thread
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2011-July/064884.html,
> are there some guidelines package designers must apply to ensure that they
> can be compiled by different versions and builds
On 16 July 2011 23:22, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> 2011/7/16 Frank Church
> >
> > I had a go buidling Lazarus with this short script
> >>
> >> set oldpath=%PATH%
> >>
> >> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
> >>
> >> make clean all PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
> >>
> >> make ins
On 17 July 2011 03:29, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>
> A language consists of 1% syntax, and 99% standard libraries.
Fair point. But with a good IDE, it can make the learning process
much easier using: code templates, code completion, parameter hints
etc... Most good IDE's support this lately.
On 17 July 2011 03:33, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> Have a look into the docs/html directory?
>
That is the Lazarus docs directory which uses a very different build
system to the FPC docs (which is what we talked about).
For Lazarus documentation you must compile the build_lcl_docs.lpi
project
On 17 July 2011 00:52, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> Where do I find the README.DOCS file?
> I use http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_2_4 and there
> is no README.DOCS.
>
Where were talking about the FPC docs repository (not Lazarus docs).
It can be checked out from the following URL:
On 17 July 2011 00:10, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
>
> That seams interesting. In my previous attempts to build the docs I
> ended up with an error for a missing latex dependency or something
> like that ... I didn't know one can build the docs without it.
You only need latex for the Langua
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
Ok, so I issued the command and it seams to have worked! But where are
the html files?
Have a look into the docs/html directory?
user-188-33-177-8:fpcdocs felipe$ cd docs
-bash: cd: docs: No suc
24 matches
Mail list logo
