Hello,
I have Day or two old SVN (Trunk) Lazarus with FPC 2.4.4
I have simple select with simple where clause. Nothing fancy.
If I run exact same SQL with SQLite Expert Personal I get the rows as
expected.
I looked my code, and did some debugging into the SQLite code, and this
happened.
1
Go to menu, Project -> Project Options -> Linking and check the "Win32 gui
application (-WG)" checkbox.
From: Rigel Rigelov
To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 8:08 AM
Subject: [Lazarus] Window on compile
Hi List,
I was conve
Hi List,
I was convert a Delphi program. When I compile and run it black window appears.
When I compile and run new project does not appear this window. Please tell me
how I can stop appear this window. Thanks!
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@li
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> On 18.07.2011 19:20, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Sven Barth
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18.07.2011 14:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 07/18/2011 02:23 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
> W:\md\dev\freepa
On 18.07.2011 19:20, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
On 18.07.2011 14:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 07/18/2011 02:23 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
W:\md\dev\freepascal\compiler\fpcdocs>make rtl.chk fcl.chk
FPCSRCDIR=W:\md\dev\f
reepascal\compiler\2.4.5
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 18.07.2011 14:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>>
>> On 07/18/2011 02:23 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>>
>>> W:\md\dev\freepascal\compiler\fpcdocs>make rtl.chk fcl.chk
>>> FPCSRCDIR=W:\md\dev\f
>>> reepascal\compiler\2.4.5
>>> fpdoc --warn-no-node
On 18.07.2011 19:08, Sven Barth wrote:
On 18.07.2011 14:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 07/18/2011 02:23 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
W:\md\dev\freepascal\compiler\fpcdocs>make rtl.chk fcl.chk
FPCSRCDIR=W:\md\dev\f
reepascal\compiler\2.4.5
fpdoc --warn-no-node --package=rtl --descr=rtl.xml --cont
On 18.07.2011 14:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 07/18/2011 02:23 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
W:\md\dev\freepascal\compiler\fpcdocs>make rtl.chk fcl.chk FPCSRCDIR=W:\md\dev\f
reepascal\compiler\2.4.5
fpdoc --warn-no-node --package=rtl --descr=rtl.xml --content=rtl.xct --hide-pro
snip...
le
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>
> No doubt. But Windows is not one of my major platforms, and the build from
> 2.4.4 (as distinct from fixes_2_4) appears to be incomplete when compared
> with the build from 2.4.2.
I don't know explain that.
BTW, the fixes_2_4 has the
Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Marcos Douglas wrote:
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
set of files. Th
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>
> Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/18 Frank Church :
>>>
>>> I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
>>> installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
>>> set of files. The
Michael Schnell wrote:
The plan is to remotely attach to a running program and not to start a
program remotely. So I suppose remote X is not an option.
In that specific case I think I'd consider splitting the "daemon" and
"UI" apart, and connecting between them with something like XML conveye
Marcos Douglas wrote:
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
set of files. There were only 48 files the compared with the 70 or so in the
others, and make was on
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 07/18/2011 02:23 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> W:\md\dev\freepascal\compiler\fpcdocs>make rtl.chk fcl.chk
>> FPCSRCDIR=W:\md\dev\f
>> reepascal\compiler\2.4.5
>> fpdoc --warn-no-node --package=rtl --descr=rtl.xml --content=rtl.xct
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
wrote:
>> My Win is Portuguese so, the translate this error is "The input line
>> is too long.".
>
> Maybe you are using the wrong make. In windows I always set the path
> before doing anything in the command line:
>
> set path=path_to_f
Hans-Peter Diettrich hat am 18. Juli 2011 um 15:20
geschrieben:
> Is it normal that the codetools try to insert e.g. "end;" into comments,
> while editing the comment?
No. Please create a bug report with an example.
Mattias--
___
Lazarus mail
> My Win is Portuguese so, the translate this error is "The input line
> is too long.".
Maybe you are using the wrong make. In windows I always set the path
before doing anything in the command line:
set path=path_to_fpc_bin_dir
W:\md\dev\freepascal\compiler\fpcdocs>make rtl.chk fcl.chk FPCSRCDIR
On 07/18/2011 02:23 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
> W:\md\dev\freepascal\compiler\fpcdocs>make rtl.chk fcl.chk
> FPCSRCDIR=W:\md\dev\f
> reepascal\compiler\2.4.5
> fpdoc --warn-no-node --package=rtl --descr=rtl.xml --content=rtl.xct
> --hide-pro
snip...
> ler\2.4.5/rtl/inc/ctypes.pp -FiW:\md\
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> A linha de entrada é muito longa.
> make: *** [rtl.chk] Error 255
>
> W:\md\dev\freepascal\compiler\fpcdocs>
> ---
> My Win is Portuguese so, the translate this error is "Th
Graeme,
Paul Breneman has even made a small FPC cross-compilation distribution
of FPC & fpGUI targeting WinCE on ARM devices, in a small 2-5MB
download. I'm pretty sure something similar could be created for
targeting Linux embedded devices too.
http://www.turbocontrol.com/helloworld.htm
I'
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>
> On 17 July 2011 16:58, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > Ok.
> > What directory I will should downloading the sources, fpc\doc? This
> > directory is created after a make command... or can be any directory
> > I want?
>
> Any directory, becau
Is it normal that the codetools try to insert e.g. "end;" into comments,
while editing the comment?
DoDi
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Frank Church hat am 18. Juli 2011 um 09:43 geschrieben:
> [...]
>
>
> It worked after I did this, but I don't know how. I may have fixed something
> else without realizing it, or it just got fixed somehow.
>
> What is the difference between opening the IDE startlazarus.exe or
> laza
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
>
> I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
> installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
> set of files. There were only 48 files the compared with the 70 or so in the
> others, and make was one of the missin
On 07/18/2011 11:23 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I have heard of quite a few developers using fpGUI directly (not via the
LCL-fpGUI widgetset which is still in Alpha state) on embedded devices -
with great success. They reported that the executables are smaller than
LCL equivalents, apps use less
On 07/18/2011 11:13 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> running - so there should be a problem with the current fpGUI (which
> uses X11 directly)
Typo alert. That should read: "...so there shouldn't be a problem..."
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free P
On 07/14/2011 02:37 PM, Roberto P. wrote:
>
> Though I can't help with main question about the RAM needs, I dare
> adding to your w.s. list fpGUI.
> I would consider it for an embedded platform and I think it supports X11.
I have heard of quite a few developers using fpGUI directly (not via the
L
On 07/14/2011 02:47 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
> Of course fpGUI is my top desire on that behalf, but unfortunately it's
> not yet as perfect with thread synchronization as GTK2 is
Please note Michael Schnell is ONLY referring to the LCL-fpGUI
widgetset. If you use fpGUI directly (no LCL involved
On 07/14/2011 03:45 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> such a way as to not antagonise the rest of the industry) I wonder what
> effect it would have on things like fpGUI which bypass the popular
> widget sets?
If Wayland actually takes off, then I'll obviously implement a Wayland
backend for fpGUI
On 07/14/2011 10:29 PM, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote:
I successfully tried the GTK+ on DirectFB (
http://directfb.org/wiki/index.php/Projects:GTK_on_DirectFB ) with
gumstix, but not for production use. ( From their site "The GTK on
DirectFB (shortly GTK-DFB from now on) project consists in
On 07/15/2011 07:51 PM, Bernd wrote:
There is also NX (freenx)
I understand that, even if reconnecting is possible, NX needs to start
the applications remotely (as children of the desktop created by NX). As
this is for monitoring deeply embedded Gadgets from time to time, this
is not an option
On 18 July 2011 00:03, Frank Church wrote:
>
>
> On 17 July 2011 16:31, leledumbo wrote:
>
>> Lazarus' makefile is different from FPC, it expects LAZARUS_INSTALL_DIR
>> instead of INSTALL_PREFIX for installation location
>>
>>
> I use INSTALL_PREFIX on LInux and it works every time.
>
> Does the
On 07/14/2011 02:37 PM, Roberto P. wrote:
I would consider it for an embedded platform and I think it supports X11.
The final goal is porting a huge Delphi program. AFAIK fpGUI still
lacks several visual Components the Delphi VXL provides. So I would need
to add them (while extending fpGUI mak
On 17 July 2011 16:35, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 14:05:11 +0100
> Frank Church wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > > > Unable to find file "staticpackages.nc"
> >[...]
> > > > staticpackages.inc is right where it normally is, and it even gets
> > > updated
> > > > during the compilation pr
34 matches
Mail list logo
