On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
No, it's a limitation (or bug) in the Lazarus widgeset.
What makes you so sure?
AFAIR the native Windows combo box is really limited on the height.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
2011/12/28 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
No, it's a limitation (or bug) in the Lazarus widgeset.
What makes you so sure?
AFAIR the native Windows combo box is really limited on
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2011/12/28 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
No, it's a limitation (or bug) in the Lazarus widgeset.
What makes you so sure?
AFAIR
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
No, it's a limitation (or bug) in the Lazarus widgeset.
What makes you so sure?
I already used Windows comboboxes decades ago, on Win3.1.
AFAIR the native Windows combo
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 14:26:02 +0100
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello together!
I'm currently experimenting with the JVM port and I have a problem when
navigating a source file of mine (Lazarus revision 34392). The
problematic locations are marked with // (number) of
On 28.12.2011 23:56, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 14:26:02 +0100
Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello together!
I'm currently experimenting with the JVM port and I have a problem when
navigating a source file of mine (Lazarus revision 34392). The
problematic
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:09:56 +0100
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 28.12.2011 23:56, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 14:26:02 +0100
Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello together!
I'm currently experimenting with the JVM port and I have a
