Hi,
On 22 August 2012 01:08, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>
> Sending other objects is different, because it's bound to platform
> capabilities and cannot be covered by a simple API.
Exactly my point. I didn't implement some half-assed DND in fpGUI.
Current LCL's DND support is totally useless. W
I have been trying to get a web services client to work with WST and
Lazarus.
The web-service is written in Java using CXF. Other client work with
this web-service without issue.
Tracing through the Lazarus code it appears that the XML is being
received and parsed but when trying to read the resu
On 21-8-2012 22:10, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After recent discussions about which library to load when loading DB client
> libraries, I changed the default names for Firebird, MySQL, Postgres.
> The component is registered now in the SQLDb package.
>
> Note that the use of the compon
Am 22.08.2012 10:02, schrieb Ian Godman:
I have been trying to get a web services client to work with WST and
Lazarus.
The web-service is written in Java using CXF. Other client work with
this web-service without issue.
Tracing through the Lazarus code it appears that the XML is being
received
On 22-8-2012 10:02, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 21-8-2012 22:10, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After recent discussions about which library to load when loading DB client
>> libraries, I changed the default names for Firebird, MySQL, Postgres.
>
>> The component is registered now in t
2012/8/22 Hans-Peter Diettrich :
> Your component should be a non-visual one, like a timer. Basing it on
> TWinControl is the wrong way, it *introduces* all the widgetset dependencies
> :-(
Have you even looked at the code? Its a TComponent. And you can
connect it to an existing TWinControl to ac
If anybody has access to an x86-64 Solaris system, please could they do
a test build of Lazarus and then test the documentation build using
make chmdocs etc.
On SPARC Solaris 10, Lazarus builds promptly. However the documentation
build has been running for almost two days now, with a "Target
2012/8/22 Hans-Peter Diettrich :
> What's complex in providing a list of filenames, in a TStrings object, and
> let the RTL/FCL do the rest?
It needs not only the drag data but also needs window handles (on
xorg) and it needs to intercept mouse and keyboard events (on windows)
to give visual feed
On Linux running on either SPARC or PPC, trying to invoke
context-sensitive help (i.e. F1 key over a keyword) fails with a
dialogue e.g. "Unknown error showing
/forms/tapplication/initialize.html". There's no error addresses etc. on
the console, the exception doesn't break the IDE.
I don't se
The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC is available for
download at the SourceForge download page:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
Choose your CPU / OS / distro and then the 1.0RC1 directory.
Minimum requirements:
Windows: 98, 2k, XP, Vista, 7, 32 or 64bit
F
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:59:26 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> On Linux running on either SPARC or PPC, trying to invoke
> context-sensitive help (i.e. F1 key over a keyword) fails with a
> dialogue e.g. "Unknown error showing
> /forms/tapplication/initialize.html". There's no error addresses e
Now with fixed URL:
The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC2 is available for
download at the SourceForge download page:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
Choose your CPU / OS / distro and then the 1.0RC2 directory.
Minimum requirements:
Windows: 98, 2k, XP, V
2012/8/22 Hans-Peter Diettrich :
> What's complex in providing a list of filenames, in a TStrings object, and
> let the RTL/FCL do the rest?
How would you find he appropriate window handle of a TButton to
initiate XDND on xorg without asking GTk2 or Qt? And what if the
TButton does not have its o
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
> dropping FPC in favour of
> another open source toolchain and their own new debugger, revamped
> FireMonkey etc.
Why do you say "another open source"? I haven't seen anything saying
that the new toolchain is open source. And I don't know
On 22-8-2012 11:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Now with fixed URL:
>
> The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC2 is available for
> download at the SourceForge download page:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
>
> Choose your CPU / OS / distro and then the 1.0RC2 dire
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:59:26 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
On Linux running on either SPARC or PPC, trying to invoke
context-sensitive help (i.e. F1 key over a keyword) fails with a
dialogue e.g. "Unknown error showing
/forms/tapplication/initialize.html". There's no
Am 22.08.2012 11:00, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC is available
for download at the SourceForge download page:
Gratulations also from me that lazarus is finally approaching 1.0 :) My
personal experience is also that lazarus is 1.0 ready becaus
Am 22.08.2012 11:32, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
On 22-8-2012 11:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Now with fixed URL:
The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC2 is available for
download at the SourceForge download page:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
Choose your CPU
On 08/21/2012 01:01 PM, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
http://blogs.embarcadero.com/jtembarcadero/2012/08/20/xe3-and-beyond/
Besides, technically, I read that Objects will become reference counting
and thus ".Free" gets obsolete (like in Prism).
-Michael
--
___
Am 22.08.2012 11:18, schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
dropping FPC in favour of
another open source toolchain and their own new debugger, revamped
FireMonkey etc.
Why do you say "another open source"? I haven't seen anything saying
Oops!
A bad day all-round :(
On 22/08/12 09:24, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 22.08.2012 10:02, schrieb Ian Godman:
>> I have been trying to get a web services client to work with WST and
>> Lazarus.
>>
>> The web-service is written in Java using CXF. Other client work with
>> this web-service without
2012/8/22 Mattias Gaertner :
> The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC is available for
> download at the SourceForge download page:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
On Ubuntu 12.04 x64:
fpc, fpc-src are yet "bad quality packages", lazarus deb is ok!
Installing e
On 22-8-2012 11:43, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 22.08.2012 11:32, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
>> On 22-8-2012 11:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>>> This release has been built with fpc 2.6.0 (the former release
>>> 0.9.30.4 was
>>> built with that too).
>>
>> Thanks Mattias!
>> Perhaps a stupid question, b
On 08/22/2012 11:00 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC is available
Is it really sensible to prepare an 1.0 release regarding the FPC
"powers" seem to intend to follow the Delphi (and MSEGUI) way and define
"String" as a sequence of 16 bit entiti
On 08/22/2012 11:44 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
They plan to use LLVM (though this is not mentioned in that roadmap
article).
Regarding the multiple request I read in the past in the FPC forums to
move FPC to use a "standard" backend (such as LLVM), this seems like a
rather logical move (also reg
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> They plan to use LLVM (though this is not mentioned in that roadmap
> article).
I wonder if this means that the resulting compiler will be open
source. I don't know anything about the licensing of LLVM, but they
could require front-ends to be
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:59:26 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
On Linux running on either SPARC or PPC, trying to invoke
context-sensitive help (i.e. F1 key over a keyword) fails with a
dialogue e.g. "Unknown error showing
/forms/tapplication/in
Den 22-08-2012 12:32, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho skrev:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
They plan to use LLVM (though this is not mentioned in that roadmap
article).
I wonder if this means that the resulting compiler will be open
source. I don't know anything about the lic
On 22-8-2012 12:03, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 11:00 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>> The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC is available
> Is it really sensible to prepare an 1.0 release regarding the FPC
> "powers" seem to intend to follow the Delphi (and MSEGUI) way an
Hello,
Did you already update your WST copy again to the latest subversion ?
Inoussa looked at your problem and made some adjustments, which should fix
the problem. If it does not, please send the WSDL, a request and response
XML so I can forward it to him.
Michael.
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Ian G
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:02:06 +0200
Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>[...]
> > You even quoted where the answer to your question is mentioned:
lol
> >>> This release has been built with fpc 2.6.0 (the former release
> > 0.9.30.4 was
> >>> built with that too).
> >
> > Lazarus releases will NEVER be
On 22-8-2012 13:56, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:02:06 +0200
> Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>> You even quoted where the answer to your question is mentioned:
>
> lol
:)
>> Thanks Sven, I knew that. As I said, I thought I saw some fixes come by
>> that were in 2.6.1
On 22-8-2012 11:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> Now with fixed URL:
>
> The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC2 is available for
> download at the SourceForge download page:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
> This release has been built with fpc 2.6.0 (the former r
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:40:22 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:59:26 +
> > Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> >
> >> On Linux running on either SPARC or PPC, trying to invoke
> >> context-sensitive help (i.e. F1 key over a keyword) fails with a
>
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:01:19 +0200
Kjow wrote:
> 2012/8/22 Mattias Gaertner :
> > The Lazarus team is glad to announce that Lazarus 1.0RC is available for
> > download at the SourceForge download page:
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/
>
> On Ubuntu 12.04 x64:
>
> fpc, fpc-src
Am 22.08.2012 14:30, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:40:22 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:59:26 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
On Linux running on either SPARC or PPC, trying to invoke
context-sensitive help (i.e. F1 key over
Am 22.08.2012 12:32, schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
They plan to use LLVM (though this is not mentioned in that roadmap
article).
I wonder if this means that the resulting compiler will be open
source. I don't know anything about the l
Am 22.08.2012 12:08, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 08/22/2012 11:44 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
They plan to use LLVM (though this is not mentioned in that roadmap
article).
Regarding the multiple request I read in the past in the FPC forums to
move FPC to use a "standard" backend (such as LLVM), thi
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:23:30 +0200
Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>[...]
> Installed and runs on Windows Vista SP2 x64 with only
> environmentoptions.xml in c:\lazarus and an existing svn config in the
> default primary config path.
>
> Gave a nice downgrade warning for my existing config.
>
> Still
On 22/08/2012 14:01, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:23:30 +0200
Reinier Olislagers wrote:
[...]
Installed and runs on Windows Vista SP2 x64 with only
environmentoptions.xml in c:\lazarus and an existing svn config in the
default primary config path.
Gave a nice downgrade warni
On 08/22/2012 02:39 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Free Pascal will never move solely to a backend like LLVM.
That is what I learned in the forum already long ago :). I did not
intend advocate LLVM over the current Pascal based backend, but I wanted
to state that it seems like a logical move for Emba
Sorry for a newbie question, but how is FPC connected to gcc anyways?
Doesn't it translate the (object) pascal code directly into the
various machine languages for the different platforms (Or into
assembler and then machine language)? Pascal, only needs a one-pass
compiler, making it by nature much
Here is a TFileDragSource component that works on GTK2 and on Win32.
FileDragSource.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
If anybody has access to an x86-64 Solaris system, please could they do
a test build of Lazarus and then test the documentation build using make
chmdocs etc.
On SPARC Solaris 10, Lazarus builds promptly. However the documentation
build has been running for almost two
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Chavoux Luyt wrote:
> Sorry for a newbie question, but how is FPC connected to gcc anyways?
It is not.
> Doesn't it translate the (object) pascal code directly into the
> various machine languages for the different platforms (Or into
> assembler and then machine
> They plan to use LLVM (though this is not mentioned in that roadmap
article).
I've read this somewhere before, but AFAIK only for the C++ builder (they
might create a Delphi frontend though, should be easy for them since Delphi
compiler is written in C++).
--
View this message in context:
h
2012/8/22 Mattias Gaertner :
> The fpc packages are the same as the last two releases. No one reported
> such a problem.
It was in the same issue report:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22598
Anyway, I just created a new one:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22694
> Please uninstall
Bernd schrieb:
2012/8/22 Hans-Peter Diettrich :
What's complex in providing a list of filenames, in a TStrings object, and
let the RTL/FCL do the rest?
How would you find he appropriate window handle of a TButton to
initiate XDND on xorg without asking GTk2 or Qt? And what if the
TButton does
Bernd schrieb:
2012/8/22 Hans-Peter Diettrich :
What's complex in providing a list of filenames, in a TStrings object, and
let the RTL/FCL do the rest?
It needs not only the drag data but also needs window handles (on
xorg) and it needs to intercept mouse and keyboard events (on windows)
to g
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Hi,
On 22 August 2012 01:08, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Sending other objects is different, because it's bound to platform
capabilities and cannot be covered by a simple API.
Exactly my point. I didn't implement some half-assed DND in fpGUI.
Current LCL's DND supp
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:40:22 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:59:26 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
On Linux running on either SPARC or PPC, trying to invoke
context-sensitive help (i.e. F1 key over a keyword) fails with a
Still trying Linux64 -> Linux32, the error now is:
ld: cannot find -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0
The greatest secret of the Universe: append ":i386" to ANY "apt-get
install" and Ubuntu does the trick.
But:
$ sudo apt-get install libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev:i386
Os pacotes a seguir têm dependências desencontradas:
l
Is it even possible? I've seen rumours of people doing this, but every
tutorial I've tried failed.
My /etc/fpc.cfg is now an alphabet soup, my apt-get system is a mess and it
sill does not work.
The setup is: Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit. It seems FPC 2.6.0 is working: the
following test works:
http://wiki.
2012/8/22 Hans-Peter Diettrich :
> You should familiarize with the basics first, before asking me to solve your
> selfmade problems.
This is getting ridiculous. I'm not asking you to solve my problems.
Instead while you are still trying to construct the most bizarre
scenarios that don't apply to
2012/8/22 Alexsander Rosa :
> Is it even possible? I've seen rumours of people doing this, but every
> tutorial I've tried failed.
I am successfully cross-compiling stuff (although no LCL) from Linux32
to Linux64. I assume the other way around should also be possible. It
looks like you are almost
Hi,
I also had problems with cross-compile Linux 64 bit -> Linux 32 bit,
but in CodeTyphon, but maybe someone find interesting tips in this
topic (on 2 page I wrote step-by-step solution):
http://www.pilotlogic.com/sitejoom/index.php/forum/cross-build-development/2230-can-t-cross-compile-from-linu
Hi,
Over in the MSEgui mailing list somebody mentioned that they have
major issues with GDB on a quad core AMD system, using
multi-threading. I told that person that I use Intel based quad core
systems for years, and have no such problems. The issues he mentioned
(if I recall correctly) was GDB fr
On 21 August 2012 12:01, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
> If you have not seen it, users of Delphi XE2 may be interested to read
And the big news is that the soon to be launched XE3 will not ship
with FireMonkey or FPC or any iOS development tools for that matter.
Wow, I can see quite a few ISV's (eg T
Apologies in advance: these are rather stream-of-consciousness and might
be a couple of days out of date due to the slowness of some of my
development systems. Generally based on 38257 with FPC 2.6.0.
I've expressed various niggles with lhelp in another thread and won't
mention anything that appe
8,6, and 3 core amds have the problem. Ubuntu 9.10+. I've implemented
synchronize with a define to build and test.
Ctrl alt f2. to get a prompt
ps -A to get the id of lazarus
kill -9 #process
Desktop Manager goes inactive until process is restarted.
Andrew Brunner
Aurawin LLC
512.574.6298
A
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:09:25 +0200
Kjow wrote:
> 2012/8/22 Mattias Gaertner :
> > The fpc packages are the same as the last two releases. No one reported
> > such a problem.
>
> It was in the same issue report:
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22598
That was about the Installed-Size fie
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:40:30 -0300
Alexsander Rosa wrote:
> Still trying Linux64 -> Linux32, the error now is:
> ld: cannot find -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0
>
> The greatest secret of the Universe: append ":i386" to ANY "apt-get
> install" and Ubuntu does the trick.
>
> But:
> $ sudo apt-get install libgd
As I'm looking for a way to handle Cookies in an automatic/global way,
instead of checking for cookie existence in every action request, I was
looking into TFPWebModule.onRequest method.
If I don't set Handled := True in that method, will the request continue
to the Action Request handler?. If yes
63 matches
Mail list logo
