Re: [Lazarus] data matrix with thousands of columns

2013-03-29 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Alexander Klenin wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Andrea Mauri wrote: Il 27/03/2013 16:11, Max Vlasov ha scritto: CREATE TABLE [Data] ( ... , [Row] INTEGER, [Column] INTEGER, [Value] TEXT ... ) As I answered to Leonardo I tried something like this but I have to insert millions of entr

Re: [Lazarus] data matrix with thousands of columns

2013-03-29 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Andrea Mauri wrote: > Il 27/03/2013 16:11, Max Vlasov ha scritto: > >> CREATE TABLE [Data] ( >> ... , >> [Row] INTEGER, [Column] INTEGER, [Value] TEXT >> ... >> ) > > As I answered to Leonardo I tried something like this but I have to insert > millions of entries w

Re: [Lazarus] data matrix with thousands of columns

2013-03-29 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Dienstag, den 26.03.2013, 15:44 +0100 schrieb Andrea Mauri: > one more thing. my data is more similar to a huge spreadsheet than a > relational DB, anyway I am looking for the best option already available > in lazarus/fpc to store and query the dataset > > Il 26/03/2013 15:38, Andrea Mauri h

Re: [Lazarus] Fixes 2.6.2 cod breaks 2.6.0 code?

2013-03-29 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:54:49 +0100 Marco van de Voort wrote: >[...] > > Yes, but 2.6.2 contains a few incompatibilities as well and Frank is > > right that a 1.0.8 release is meant as a bug fix release, so it should > > not contain incompatibilities. > > That's a sliding slope. Strictly speaking

Re: [Lazarus] Fixes 2.6.2 cod breaks 2.6.0 code?

2013-03-29 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> What fixes branch are you talking about? FPC 2.6 fixes or Lazarus 1.0 > > >> fixes? > > > In the next release we should mention that it uses a newer > > > compiler, which includes many bug fixes, but contains a f

Re: [Lazarus] embed git version info

2013-03-29 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Alexander Klenin wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 2013-03-28 11:52, Xiangrong Fang wrote: That should work :) That does not work. Indeed, I just tested it (which I didn't before). This problem is relatively frequent. See http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.p

Re: [Lazarus] [SynEdit] do we still need LIST_CLEAR_NOT_VIRTUAL

2013-03-29 Thread Zaher Dirkey
Ok, I will remove it when make clean patch. On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Martin wrote: > On 25/03/2013 11:44, Zaher Dirkey wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Martin wrote: >>> >>> How long has it been virtual in the fpc base class? >> >> Sorry for the delay >> TList.Clear is virtu