Hi
Before i post a bug
In Windows/WinCE is Menu ID (MenuItem.Commad) is Zero based?
By my logic ID must be start from 1, zero mean no ID or Command
In Menus unit MenuItem.inc line 110
---
FCommand := UniqueCommand;
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=24264
T
hanks in advance.
Zaher Dirkey
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
13.04.2013 16:49, Zaher Dirkey пишет:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=24264
Thanks in advance.
Done.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Ganetsky mailto:gan...@narod.ru
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Hi, again, i failed to do that, any example to do it, for SynEdit package?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
Yes, with macros you can force packages to be recompiled on project
changes.
You can also change all (almost all) packages very quickly.
Most
1) If you want a single package only, open the package and edit the
options like for a project.
2) Do add the same settings as for the IDE (from configure build IDE)
http://imagebin.org/253861
Add $(IDEBuildOptions) to the custom options
Or for the options from the project: $(ProjectOpts)
Hi,
Lazarus stopped to rebuild the LCL if I change an includefile (that
belongs to the LCL).
Okay, that's not totally honest.
I changed an LCL file to use an include file.
If I change the main unitfile it rebuilds.
If i change the include it doesn't.
(Took me a while to figure that out)
Is
--- El sáb 13-abr-13, Bart bartjun...@gmail.com escribió:
De: Bart bartjun...@gmail.com
Asunto: [Lazarus] Lazarus doesn't rebuild LCL if I change some include file
A: Lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Fecha: sábado, 13 de abril de 2013, 10:34
Hi,
Lazarus stopped
Hi Mattias,
Thanks for answering...
I´m confusing... I always find out that the CONSOLE directive exists only for
applications that does not require a GUI or in other words, applications
that does not require a X server
How can I distinguish applications in Text mode (CONSOLE) from
I´m confusing... I always find out that the CONSOLE directive exists only
for applications that does not require a GUI or in other words,
applications that does not require a X server
Linux applications are console, Linux doesn't have integrated GUI as a part
of the system like Windows
Hi,
Why is a runtime package (manual compilation only) forced to re-compile
by a design time dependant package when the dependant package is compiled?
Stephano
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:59:13 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why is a runtime package (manual compilation only) forced to re-compile
by a design time dependant package when the dependant package is compiled?
A manual compilation only is never recompiled automatically, unless
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Jesus Reyes jesus...@yahoo.com.mx wrote:
[...]
Is the include file part of the LCL package?, it seems the IDE monitors files
that are included in the package, if it's not included, it's not monitored.
Yes.
Mattias
--
On 13/04/13 21:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:59:13 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why is a runtime package (manual compilation only) forced to re-compile
by a design time dependant package when the dependant package is compiled?
A manual compilation only
On 13-4-2013 19:25, Frank Church wrote:
I compiled the Lazarus using FPC 2.6.0 and the fixes branch of Lazarus.
When I do a version check the Lazarus version is version is 1.0.9 and
the svn revision is 40800, but the output displayed from fpcup says
40759. Shouldn't the svn revision be
Not worked for me, i Added $(ProjectOpts) to custom options in SynEdit
package (same with my packages but i will take SynEdit as example)
What i have
I Have 2 build mode (Debug, Release) i want when use Debug all compiler
option passed to SynEdit package and have debug info and so on, When use
Hm, yes, sorry $(ProjectOpts) may not work. Not sure where I picked it
up, but I had it as a left over.
If you want to push changed project options, down into the used
packages, then that is going to be tricky. (Dependencies normally do not
go that way)
IIRC ( I do no longer have my
On 13/04/13 21:27, patspiper wrote:
On 13/04/13 21:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:59:13 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why is a runtime package (manual compilation only) forced to re-compile
by a design time dependant package when the dependant package is
On 13/04/13 22:17, patspiper wrote:
On 13/04/13 21:27, patspiper wrote:
On 13/04/13 21:05, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:59:13 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why is a runtime package (manual compilation only) forced to
re-compile
by a design time dependant
Is is like
if defined(RELEASE) then
CustomOptions := ' -O-1 ';
If yes it will be the head of the yarn(proverb)
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
if defined(MACRONAME) then
CustomOptions := ' -O-1 ';
--
I am using last
On 13/04/2013 20:27, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
Is is like
if defined(RELEASE) then
CustomOptions := ' -O-1 ';
If yes it will be the head of the yarn(proverb)
Isnt the above identical to the below?
When I did it, I did have to define the MACRO myself. (in the project,
in each
fpGUI is in my list, but now i like to close my opened projects before
looking up to another sources, we have hard time here.
Now there is Maximus i like the design :-)
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:44 PM, patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the original proverb is closer to 'tip of the string', meaning
like the 1st lead or clue of a mystery or case.
Yes true :) but i used Yarn instead of string, because string is
reserved word :P
Sorry for off
On 13/04/2013 20:46, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:44 PM, patspiper patspi...@gmail.com
mailto:patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the original proverb is closer to 'tip of the string',
meaning like the 1st lead or clue of a mystery or case.
Yes true :) but i used
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
Is this an American or UK proverb? Or translated from another language?
It is from my Arabic language, used when we catch the head/tip of the
string and start pull it to discover the end of it, it is mean we
started(the
It would seem that the Lazarus IDE integrated documentation editor fails to
work with units which use dotted names. For example:
unit MyCompany.Utilities.Text;
Can someone verify this for me? I am preparing some OSS pascal packages (a
cross platforming gaming library) which use the above pattern
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:27:11 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
In what needs building (with the design package selected), the
runtime package is marked as No build needed. Nevertheless, compiling
the design time package tries to compile the runtime units.
It turned out
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:30:15 -0400
Anthony Walter sys...@gmail.com wrote:
It would seem that the Lazarus IDE integrated documentation editor fails to
work with units which use dotted names. For example:
unit MyCompany.Utilities.Text;
Can someone verify this for me? I am preparing some OSS
I tested on on another computer with a different OS (Windows 7) and
replicated the problem. I filled out 3 bug reports for issue
numbers 0024269, 0024270, and 0024271. One issue is related to a copy and
paste problem with the integrated Lazarus documentation editor window.
--
On Saturday 13 April 2013 21:30:17 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2013-04-13 20:05, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
Not worked for me, i Added $(ProjectOpts) to custom options in SynEdit
package (same with my packages but i will take SynEdit as example)
What i have I Have 2 build mode (Debug,
29 matches
Mail list logo
