On 2013-04-18 19:08, Kostas Michalopoulos wrote:
No actually i am a fan, but not for shoving in the browser stuff that
should have been native applications that take full advantage of my
computer's resources and my operating system's facilities.
+1
I also believe the web has its place, but
Hi,
Rebuilding stops and a message pops up:
Unable to find file unit2.pas.
If it belongs to your project, check search path in
Project - Compiler Options - Search Paths - Other Unit Files. If this
file belongs to a package, check the appropriate package compiler
options. If this file belongs
On 4/19/13, patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
Rebuilding stops and a message pops up:
Lazarus builds OK here.
40848 improved TFileSearcher.
40849 replaced GetAllFilesMask with AllFilesMask. It affected many
files but is a trivial change otherwise.
Try with Clean all in Configure Build
On 19/04/13 11:32, Juha Manninen wrote:
On 4/19/13, patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
Rebuilding stops and a message pops up:
Lazarus builds OK here.
40848 improved TFileSearcher.
40849 replaced GetAllFilesMask with AllFilesMask. It affected many
files but is a trivial change otherwise.
Can you please go back in SVN history and check that 40849 really
causes the problem.
What is your compiler version? I have FPC 2.6.2. AllFilesMask should
not cause problems with any compiler version though.
Does anybody else have such problems?
Juha
On 4/19/13, patspiper patspi...@gmail.com
Hi,
This function seems to be empty (hint issued)
function TControl.GetAnchorSide(AIndex: Integer): TAnchorSide;
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
I only found:
function TControl.GetAnchorSide(Kind: TAnchorKind): TAnchorSide;
and it is not empty. What Lazarus version?
Juha
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This function seems to be empty (hint issued)
function TControl.GetAnchorSide(AIndex: Integer): TAnchorSide;
On 19/04/13 12:01, Juha Manninen wrote:
Can you please go back in SVN history and check that 40849 really
causes the problem.
What is your compiler version? I have FPC 2.6.2. AllFilesMask should
not cause problems with any compiler version though.
Does anybody else have such problems?
The
Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com hat am 19. April 2013 um 11:01 geschrieben:
Hi,
This function seems to be empty (hint issued)
function TControl.GetAnchorSide(AIndex: Integer): TAnchorSide;
Lazarus svn 40851 has:
function TControl.GetAnchorSide(Kind: TAnchorKind): TAnchorSide;
begin
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:56:12PM -0400, Anthony Walter wrote:
Pascal would have to make an inventory of all files in the searchpath, not
just in a certain (classpath or GAC) location.
There are only 2 differences between what we currently have with dotted
unit names acting as
I have git repo from github.com/graemeg.
So perhaps it is broken...
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 11:18 Juha Manninen wrote / napísal(a):
I only found:
function TControl.GetAnchorSide(Kind: TAnchorKind): TAnchorSide;
and it is not empty. What Lazarus version?
Juha
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com
Och sorry. My branch is broken. I cannot figure out how that happened, I
believe Lazarus messed up control.inc for some reason. Or I did
something stupid.
Usage of Lazarus is still bad with NVDA...
Really I would like to know what exactly happened. I am playing with
accessibility so I modified
Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl hat am 19. April 2013 um 12:24
geschrieben:
[...]
My remark was somewhat compiler specific, but it bleeds through in the IDE
too, since in a Lazarus/FPC project, not all used source must be named in
the project. Stronger, the project doesn't even exist on a
Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com hat am 19. April 2013 um 12:43 geschrieben:
Och sorry. My branch is broken. I cannot figure out how that happened, I
believe Lazarus messed up control.inc for some reason. Or I did
something stupid.
Usage of Lazarus is still bad with NVDA...
Really I would
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Och sorry. My branch is broken.
Did you do this step for sure :
$ git checkout -b upstream origin/upstream
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Yes I did. And git complained that branch upstream already exists.
Then I did
git checkout -b win32Accessibility upstream
And started to make changes. Did several git rebase upstream.
I am sure I didn't touch things like anchors etc.
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 13:40 Juha Manninen wrote / napísal(a):
On
So this means that something was added that is really not needed by code
completion?
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 12:55 Mattias Gaertner wrote / napísal(a):
Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com hat am 19. April 2013 um 12:43 geschrieben:
Och sorry. My branch is broken. I cannot figure out how that happened, I
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes I did. And git complained that branch upstream already exists.
Then I did
git checkout -b win32Accessibility upstream
Try this:
$ git checkout upstream
$ git pull
$ gitk --all
What is the last revision you see at upstream head?
Juha
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:19:00 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/04/13 12:01, Juha Manninen wrote:
Can you please go back in SVN history and check that 40849 really
causes the problem.
What is your compiler version? I have FPC 2.6.2. AllFilesMask should
not cause problems
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:59:15 +0200
Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com wrote:
So this means that something was added that is really not needed by code
completion?
Yes.
Mattias
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 2013-04-19 13:03, Juha Manninen wrote:
What is the last revision you see at upstream head?
I can also confirm that the github mirror (both FPC and Lazarus) are in
sync... FPC last commit 5 hours ago, Lazarus last commit 15 minutes ago.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a
I'm creating a very basic TCustomControl with just a Constructor and its
Destructor.
TMyCustomControl = class(TCustomControl)
public
constructor Create(TheOwner: TComponent);override;
destructor Destroy; override;
end;
In a main form's TForm.Create I'm creating an instance of my
On 19/04/13 15:48, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:19:00 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/04/13 12:01, Juha Manninen wrote:
Can you please go back in SVN history and check that 40849 really
causes the problem.
What is your compiler version? I have FPC 2.6.2.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote:
I'm creating a very basic TCustomControl with just a Constructor and its
Destructor.
TMyCustomControl = class(TCustomControl)
public
constructor Create(TheOwner: TComponent);override;
destructor Destroy;
On 2013-04-19 10:35:18 -0300, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote:
I'm creating a very basic TCustomControl with just a Constructor and its
Destructor.
TMyCustomControl = class(TCustomControl)
public
constructor
On 17/04/13 18:32, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Yes, it was more a reflex than a well thought answer.
Manually compiled packages do not follow the recommendations. So I
guess it will be hard to write an analyzer that gives the right
advice.
For packages that share source directories the advice is
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote:
On 2013-04-19 10:35:18 -0300, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com
wrote:
I'm creating a very basic TCustomControl with just a Constructor and its
Destructor.
On 2013-04-19 10:53:09 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote:
On 2013-04-19 10:35:18 -0300, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com
wrote:
I'm creating a very basic
On 19/04/13 16:59, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
On 2013-04-19 10:53:09 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote:
On 2013-04-19 10:35:18 -0300, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com
Unfortunately the gitk doesn't work at all with screen reader, even
display hooks are not working so I see absolutely nothing.
How can I retrieve this information through the console?
I am fairly new to git...
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 14:03 Juha Manninen wrote / napísal(a):
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes
I believe this is already solved, as Mattias said, something not needed
was generated by code completion.
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 14:58 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote / napísal(a):
On 2013-04-19 13:03, Juha Manninen wrote:
What is the last revision you see at upstream head?
I can also confirm that the
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.comwrote:
I'm going to have to stop at this singular point. Aurawin web apps are
instantly accessible globally and scaleable.
Yeah, but the majority of people use their apps in one or two computers
(home and work) so it
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately the gitk doesn't work at all with screen reader, even
display hooks are not working so I see absolutely nothing.
How can I retrieve this information through the console?
git log with its many parameters.
I must say you have a
GREP wrote:
I get this message:
The connection has timed out
The server at forum.lazarus.freepascal.org is taking too long to
respond.
The modem works fine with all other sites (and is brand new).
I tried to access id with the firewall shutdown: nothing.
What would the provider do to
Ahh git log. :-D I am stupid really, I am using it often.
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 17:28 Juha Manninen wrote / napísal(a):
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately the gitk doesn't work at all with screen reader, even
display hooks are not working so I see absolutely nothing.
How
I'm using a C++ library with a function that receives a parameter this
way:
int getData(void * buffer, unsigned long bufSize){
bufSize = 10;
return 1;
}
The Pascal definition I'm using is this:
function (var buffer: pointer; var bufsize: longword): Integer; cdecl;
I'm using this library
In case anyone is interested, I tested the free cmd line tool (doc-o-matic
express) for help generation which handles both of these problems (dotted
namespaces and delphi style generics). It even has a lot of extra features.
Check out the impressive results from a test on one unit:
it gives:
1 *** Tiempo de espera agotado para esta
solicitud.
(=time expired)
2 9 ms * 10 ms 10.152.250.254
310 ms 9 ms 9 ms 172.16.110.1
416 ms16 ms15 ms 10.100.0.17
539 ms
I think you could not declare the second parameter of GetData as var
parameter. Because it is then treated as address.
I am not sure what corresponds to C++ unsigned long, perhaps LongWord?
So try to change the second parameter so that it is not a var parameter.
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 19:18 Leonardo M.
On 2013-04-19 20:52:04 +0200, Lubos Pintes wrote:
I think you could not declare the second parameter of GetData as var
parameter. Because it is then treated as address.
I am not sure what corresponds to C++ unsigned long, perhaps LongWord?
So try to change the second parameter so that it is
On 19/04/13 7:16, GREP wrote:
I don't even know how to add a hostfile
and your command on Windos XP sp3 dowsnot work
ipconfig
Try opening a command prompt in the directory
c:\windows\system32
and type
ipconfig /flushdns Enter
(note that an h was missed off the parameter in a previous
I probably don't understand. You will be able to change it, I see no
problem. It is a local variable which can be changed.
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 20:55 Leonardo M. Ramé wrote / napísal(a):
On 2013-04-19 20:52:04 +0200, Lubos Pintes wrote:
I think you could not declare the second parameter of GetData
On 2013-04-19 21:08:29 +0200, Lubos Pintes wrote:
I probably don't understand. You will be able to change it, I see no
problem. It is a local variable which can be changed.
Dňa 19. 4. 2013 20:55 Leonardo M. Ramé wrote / napísal(a):
On 2013-04-19 20:52:04 +0200, Lubos Pintes wrote:
I think
This is How I understand the var parameter.
It is an address, but is treated as normal variable, so it is not needed
to dereference a pointer.
For example
int f(int* x) in C/C++ corresponds to
function f(var x: integer): integer;
Now we have
int f(int x);
If you declare it as
function f(var x:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:30:59 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/04/13 15:48, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:19:00 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/04/13 12:01, Juha Manninen wrote:
Can you please go back in SVN history and check that 40849
On 2013-04-19 21:24:50 +0200, Lubos Pintes wrote:
This is How I understand the var parameter.
It is an address, but is treated as normal variable, so it is not
needed to dereference a pointer.
For example
int f(int* x) in C/C++ corresponds to
function f(var x: integer): integer;
Now we have
Leonardo M. Ramé schrieb:
On 2013-04-19 21:08:29 +0200, Lubos Pintes wrote:
I probably don't understand. You will be able to change it, I see no
problem. It is a local variable which can be changed.
You're right, C++ is equivalent to Pascal var.
Well, removing the var in the 2nd param, at
On 19/04/13 22:31, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hence, the cycle was to inspect IDE internals, rebuild the
IDE, and check the messages window. So I had an insight on what was
supposed to be recompiled and most importantly why, and compared that
with the actual compilation.
You can see in the stdout
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:08:14 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
When the LCL is recompiled your package must be compiled too. But since
it is manual, it was not done that. That gives the checksum changed
error.
There were several previous revisions, and none caused these
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:12:36 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/04/13 22:31, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
[...]
Mine was set at 512 lines (I have been upgrading Ubuntu versions since
8.04 or 8.10). I'll make it unlimited.
Then you can easily run out of memory.
Try 10 to 100.000
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:41:37 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/04/13 23:22, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:08:14 +0300
patspiper patspi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
When the LCL is recompiled your package must be compiled too. But since
it is manual, it
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:45:15PM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I've tried using fpdoc from FPC 2.6.2, 2.6.3 and 2.7.1. I each case
fpdoc crashes. I've tried generating HTML, CHM and IPF documentation -
no luck with any of them.
I'm using Lazarus (trunk) from r40661 (28 March 2013).
ok the command worked but did nothing:still timed out
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Is-the-site-http-forum-lazarus-freepascal-org-dead-tp4030766p4030849.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Hello,
I'm trying to get the Bluetooth package running (here):
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Bluetooth
and got the following error on Lazarus V1.1;
Error: Fields cannot appear after a method or property definition, start a
new visibility section first
at this line:
WiiMotes: TWiiMotes;
in
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:37:17 -0400, Anthony Tekatch anth...@unihedron.com
wrote:
Also, I noticed that the hci_inquiry_1 returns 0 if only one Bluetooth
device is found, in WiiMoteTools.pas :
for i:=0 to found_devices-1 do begin
will not work, it should be changed to:
for i:=0 to
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:37:17 -0400
Anthony Tekatch anth...@unihedron.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get the Bluetooth package running (here):
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Bluetooth
and got the following error on Lazarus V1.1;
Error: Fields cannot appear after a method or property
56 matches
Mail list logo
