Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

On 20-4-2013 22:57, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On 2013-04-20 20:21, Lubos Pintes wrote: >> ... And something that is totally inaccessible. > So "totally inaccessible" is grossly overstated. I don't know. Does DocView work nicely with screen readers? I think that is what ubos meant. >> So please, p

Re: [Lazarus] Can not run in debug mode for WinCe

Sorry the last image at the bottom, where I wrote "and I have the gdb on my D:drive " should have been this: -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Can-not-run-in-debug-mode-for

[Lazarus] Can not run in debug mode for WinCe

Hi I have tried (and read) all I could till now, but I haven't succeded Please, help. The app builds fine and runs fine in the WM 6.1 emulator. But I cannot run it from Lazarus. These are my project options

[Lazarus] UPDATED: Re: documentation snapshot

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 05:27:29PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > I've made some progress with getting fpdoc up to speed, and here is an > initial snapshot: > > http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/doc-chm_with_lcl.zip The snapshot above was updated. Most interpackage hyperlinks work again, and the

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

On 2013-04-20 20:21, Lubos Pintes wrote: > ... And something that is totally inaccessible. As Sven said, I have implemented a open source pure Pascal viewer that currently runs on Linux (even 10 year old distros), Windows 95-8, FreeBSD, Solaris, Raspberry Pi, WinCE and other Linux ARM Embedded dev

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 09:39:49PM +0200, Sven Barth wrote: > On 20.04.2013 21:21, Lubos Pintes wrote: > > ... And something that is totally inaccessible. > > So please, please, no something "proprietary". Use widely used formats > > like HTML, or PDF if you absolutely must. > > Considering that I

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

On 20.04.2013 21:21, Lubos Pintes wrote: ... And something that is totally inaccessible. So please, please, no something "proprietary". Use widely used formats like HTML, or PDF if you absolutely must. Considering that IBM is not developing/improving the IPF/INF format anymore, the fact that G

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

... And something that is totally inaccessible. So please, please, no something "proprietary". Use widely used formats like HTML, or PDF if you absolutely must. Dňa 20. 4. 2013 20:32 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote / napísal(a): On 2013-04-20 18:22, Anthony Walter wrote: Here is an example if you want

[Lazarus] New bug with Configure Lazarus IDE?

I was testing fpcup on a fresh install of Windows and everything seemed to build okay, but when I opened lazarus for the first time and tried to set paths, I got the following message with the FPC Sources tab: "Warning: Found version ..3, expect 2.6.3." I checked initialsetupdlg.pas and the routi

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 02:58:27PM -0400, Anthony Walter wrote: > The benefit of online docs ... > Anyone can access them without installing a thing (assuming people have a > web browser, which everyone does). This allows people to peruse/browse > before they try, which is what most people do, re

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

The benefit of online docs ... Anyone can access them without installing a thing (assuming people have a web browser, which everyone does). This allows people to peruse/browse before they try, which is what most people do, read the web and google search stuff. Since online docs are online, they b

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

On 2013-04-20 18:22, Anthony Walter wrote: > > Here is an example if you want some inspiration: > http://codebot.org/bare/default.html Problem with web based documentation is that they are very slow, requires online access, and lacks lots of feature that make dedicated documentation viewers a muc

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:22:38PM -0400, Anthony Walter wrote: > Were you going to tackle the dotted unit name Certainly not. > and Delphi style generic declaration problems in the bug tracker? That is more interesting, and closer to my heart, but a bit beyond me atm, I'm afraid. I'm just doin

Re: [Lazarus] Sharing of large files

On 04/15/2013 06:26 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: <...> I highly recommend you try Ubuntu One [https://one.ubuntu.com/], which is available for Linux, Windows, Mac OSX, iOS and Android. You get 5GB of data storage free, and can share files (with the public, or privately with your own devices) an

Re: [Lazarus] documentation snapshot

Thanks Marco. Were you going to tackle the dotted unit name and Delphi style generic declaration problems in the bug tracker? I've been testing documentation generation tools and editing together a nice style with a tree view feature (I'm working on adding an index feature). Here is an example if

[Lazarus] documentation snapshot

I've made some progress with getting fpdoc up to speed, and here is an initial snapshot: http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/doc-chm_with_lcl.zip Known issues: - The class trees are not complete/corrupted where they span packages borders (so often ends with an unclickable TComponent with (?) next to i

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus helpfiles

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:53:59AM +0100, Lukasz Sokol wrote: ( very old message, ran into it by accident while searching for something else) > If the point of CHM is that they use less disk space than unpacked HTML, > (yeah, I see the point : lcl.chm 11.577MB, fcl.chm 1.968MB, vs unpacked > HT

Re: [Lazarus] Building LCL docs

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:16:34AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > I'm still debugging, but I get the feeling this is because someone passes > > some fpmake as an unit (to document) while it is a pascal main program. Of > > course fpdoc could check better, but probably all it can do is throw an

Re: [Lazarus] Library function trashing object

Yet another thing, someone also mentioned this. The cdecl calling convention corresponds to extern "C" in C++. Maybe you are using stdcall in your C++ library? Or perhaps you are on Linux where this is not relevant? But the extern "C" could be relevant also on Linux. Dňa 19. 4. 2013 21:24 Lubo