Re: [Lazarus] Changing the cursor to hourglass then to default

2013-09-22 Thread Sven Barth
On 21.09.2013 22:46, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On Saturday 21/09/2013 at 18:40, Sven Barth wrote: Weren't you the one who asked some years ago why FPC behaves differently on that case? [please consider trimming some quotes before you post] Not when I'm on a train with only my mobile and being

[Lazarus] ide.lpk 's project.pp and freepascal project.pp, same filename problem

2013-09-22 Thread FreeMan
Hello, All detail info at to this link. so no need write one more. http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,22040.0.html I'm writeing component, it has a desigtime package(Martin say IDE add-on) I found TUnitInfo in project.pp but I can not use this IDE package's files. IDEintf has

Re: [Lazarus] Help needed for issue #20311: IDE always tailors "Target processor" options for Intel CPUs

2013-09-22 Thread Juha Manninen
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > This from 2.6.2 on a Linux Mac: > > Compiler CPU Target: powerpc Thanks. I updated the processor type list for PowerPc in r42909. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freep

Re: [Lazarus] Packages

2013-09-22 Thread Chris Crori
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 20:10:02 +0300, Chris Crori wrote: Hi all, is there a "$ComponentName" directive that i can put in unit output directory in my packages? Thanks -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.la

[Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-22 Thread Junior
Why development remains constant for msdos? Is there a human being who uses msdos yet? I see constant updating in fpc 2.7.1 for msdos, was in doubt so I'm asking the question out of curiosity. thanks -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazaru

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-22 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Am 22.09.2013 13:46, schrieb Junior: > Why development remains constant for msdos? Because somebody wants to do so. No more, no less. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-22 Thread Junior
hehehe, it was only a question. Em 22-09-2013 08:59, Florian Klämpfl escreveu: Am 22.09.2013 13:46, schrieb Junior: Why development remains constant for msdos? Because somebody wants to do so. No more, no less. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@l

Re: [Lazarus] ide.lpk 's project.pp and freepascal project.pp, same filename problem

2013-09-22 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:38:08 +0300 FreeMan wrote: > Hello, > All detail info at to this link. so no need write one more. > > http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,22040.0.html I see questions that you tried to access some internal IDE structures, but not why. What do you want to d

Re: [Lazarus] ide.lpk 's project.pp and freepascal project.pp, same filename problem

2013-09-22 Thread FreeMan
I need root component of file, that link has a screenshot, my component's code and form on there. /ThePropertyEditorHook.LookupRoot := AComponent;///TUnitInfo.Component I need this 22-09-2013 19:12 tarihinde, Mattias Gaertner yazdı: On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:38:08 +0300 FreeMan wrote: Hello,

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-22 Thread wkitty42
On Sunday, September 22, 2013 7:46 AM, Junior wrote: > Is there a human being who uses msdos yet? yes, there are still quitet many DOS systems out there... there's even freeDOS and similar FOSS(?) DOS projects... some of them are even 32bit and can use all available memory like other OSes of

[Lazarus] Refactoring - Inverse Assignment

2013-09-22 Thread Richard Mace
Hi Guy's, Just wanted to say Thank You to the person that came up with the idea/coded the "Inverse Assignment" feature. I just stumbled across it and said out loud "oh, smart!" :) Richard -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org h