Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Kavalenka Anton
BTW - i have a port of Turbovision -like library called GraphVision (with sources) - window system built entirely on graph unit. I think it is possible to create Lazarus widgetset wrapped around this DOS GUI system. I'll ask the author - if he agrees to give it out for community. On 23 September

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Michael Schnell
On 09/24/2013 10:58 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: When you try to create a thread, your program terminates and writes a message that threading is not supported. While this absolutely does make sense, one could think about alternatives. AFAIK, (at least for some archs) there is a variant of the

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Michael Schnell wrote: On 09/24/2013 10:58 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: When you try to create a thread, your program terminates and writes a message that threading is not supported. While this absolutely does make sense, one could think about alternatives. AFAIK, (at least for some archs)

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Michael Schnell schrieb: On 09/24/2013 10:58 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: When you try to create a thread, your program terminates and writes a message that threading is not supported. While this absolutely does make sense, one could think about alternatives. AFAIK, (at least for some archs)

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 25/09/2013 10:51, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Michael Schnell schrieb: Do you mean DOS as a (16 bit) OS, or as a DOS-Box (terminal)? As the thread indicates: DOS as in 16 bit DOS, runnable on an 8086 processor. Yes, the compiler could run in the DOSBox product (which emulates the environment

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 25/09/2013 11:29, Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 25/09/2013 10:51, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Michael Schnell schrieb: Do you mean DOS as a (16 bit) OS, or as a DOS-Box (terminal)? As the thread indicates: DOS as in 16 bit DOS, runnable on an 8086 processor. Yes, the compiler could run in

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
On 09/25/2013 11:26 AM, Michael Schnell wrote: On 09/24/2013 10:58 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: When you try to create a thread, your program terminates and writes a message that threading is not supported. While this absolutely does make sense, one could think about alternatives. AFAIK,

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Michael Schnell
On 09/25/2013 10:51 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Do you mean DOS as a (16 bit) OS, or as a DOS-Box (terminal)? Of course limited to a DOS box this would make no sense at all. I did not do a research on in what environments such pthreadlib could work. I suppose you need a 32 bit DOS

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 25/09/2013 12:15, Michael Schnell wrote: On 09/25/2013 10:51 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: Do you mean DOS as a (16 bit) OS, or as a DOS-Box (terminal)? Of course limited to a DOS box this would make no sense at all. I did not do a research on in what environments such pthreadlib

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 09/25/2013 11:26 AM, Michael Schnell wrote: On 09/24/2013 10:58 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: When you try to create a thread, your program terminates and writes a message that threading is not supported. While this absolutely does make sense, one could think about

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Michael Schnell
On 09/25/2013 12:20 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: You do know there already is a GO32v2 compiler? I suppose same does create 32 bit code usable in a DOS-alike environment, and thus could be a target for allowing linking to an internal-user-land-thread enabled version of pthreadlib (while I

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Michael Schnell
More than 15 Years ago I on DOS did do the first tests for my preemptive multitasking library (in C), that that finally works (up til now) in an 68K product. :-) -Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
On 25.9.2013 г. 14:01 ч., Michael Schnell wrote: More than 15 Years ago I on DOS did do the first tests for my preemptive multitasking library (in C), that that finally works (up til now) in an 68K product. :-) Real mode or DPMI? IMHO, real mode is doable, DPMI - not so much (at least not

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Michael Schnell
On 09/25/2013 01:00 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: Real mode or DPMI? IMHO, real mode is doable, DPMI - not so much (at least not without using a certain DPMI host with special modifications). Did DPMI even exist at this time ? IIRC it was a native 8088 chip -

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
On 25.9.2013 г. 14:14 ч., Michael Schnell wrote: On 09/25/2013 01:00 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: Real mode or DPMI? IMHO, real mode is doable, DPMI - not so much (at least not without using a certain DPMI host with special modifications). Did DPMI even exist at this time ? 15 years ago is

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Michael Schnell
On 09/25/2013 01:39 PM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: 15 years ago is 1998, so yes. Maybe it was even earlier? Probably. In fact, 15 years ago the product using the 68K version of the library was released. -Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Why development remains constant for msdos?

2013-09-25 Thread Mattias Gaertner
What has this to do with Lazarus? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] What's behind an IP address

2013-09-25 Thread Antonio Fortuny
Hi Folks. This is specifically neither a Lazarus nor an FPC question but because I'm using a Lazarus project (along with Synapse) I ask this question: Having an IP address, which could be the best question to ask to that IP to know what's behind this address ? - Echo (ICMP 7) is not

Re: [Lazarus] What's behind an IP address

2013-09-25 Thread Lukasz Sokol
On 25/09/13 13:56, Antonio Fortuny wrote: Hi Folks. This is specifically neither a Lazarus nor an FPC question but because I'm using a Lazarus project (along with Synapse) I ask this question: Having an IP address, which could be the best question to ask to that IP to know what's behind

Re: [Lazarus] ide automaximizing on startup

2013-09-25 Thread Seth Grover
What OS? Debian Linux testing (GTK2) Have you tried to close the IDE and delete the environmentoptions.xml? I have now, and that actually seems to have taken care of the problem. Thank you very much! -SG -- Seth Grover ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ -- ___

Re: [Lazarus] What's behind an IP address

2013-09-25 Thread Anton Kavalenka
On 25.09.2013 15:56, Antonio Fortuny wrote: Hi Folks. This is specifically neither a Lazarus nor an FPC question but because I'm using a Lazarus project (along with Synapse) I ask this question: Having an IP address, which could be the best question to ask to that IP to know what's behind

Re: [Lazarus] Memory leak in PascalScript

2013-09-25 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:27 AM, silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Can you help me to fix this issue?: https://github.com/remobjects/pascalscript/issues/61 Thank you! -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog -- I guess the fpc-pascal list is a better

Re: [Lazarus] Memory leak in PascalScript

2013-09-25 Thread silvioprog
2013/9/25 Flávio Etrusco flavio.etru...@gmail.com On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:27 AM, silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Can you help me to fix this issue?: https://github.com/remobjects/pascalscript/issues/61 Thank you! -- Silvio Clécio My public projects -

[Lazarus] FPC arm building issue

2013-09-25 Thread Kjow
Hi all, I'm trying to compile FPC svn trunk (r25569) for android-arm and linux-arm under Windows 8, but I have some troubles. Reverting to r24523, all works well! 1) arm-linux make clean crossall crossinstall OS_TARGET=linux CPU_TARGET=arm CROSSOPT=-CfVFPV3 -OoFASTMATH -CpARMV6

[Lazarus] Lazarus IDE in Italian: who asked for it ?

2013-09-25 Thread duilio foschi
after installation, my Lazarus IDE (1.0.12) is in Italian. This means that Lazarus has been correctly localized but ... I never asked for it :) I prefer to have Lazarus IDE in English. How do I switch to English ? Thank you Duilio -- ___ Lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus IDE in Italian: who asked for it ?

2013-09-25 Thread Kjow
2013/9/25 duilio foschi octopush...@gmail.com after installation, my Lazarus IDE (1.0.12) is in Italian. This means that Lazarus has been correctly localized but ... I never asked for it :) I prefer to have Lazarus IDE in English. How do I switch to English ? Thank you Duilio Ciao