Le 12/10/2013 13:36, Marco van de Voort
a crit:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:28:33PM -0400, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
There was something similar 1-2 years ago in Great Britain, where education
commission recognized pascal languages (Delphi) as
On 10/12/2013 09:18 PM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
Students tend to overfocus on embellishing forms etc, and not spending
their time on the more problem-solving oriented assignment.
IMHO the contrary is true.
Using Delphi (or Lazarus) you can concentrate on the problem solving ,
while
On 10/12/2013 01:36 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Probably because dolling up the UI is easier and gives
instant-gratification
Better than frustrating the weaker students with no gratification at all.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Hi,
I tried to compile an empty project in Lazarus (IDE built with gtk2)
with qt widgetset, but got the following errors (note the duplication of
linking):
Hint: Start of reading config file /home/me/.fpc.cfg
Hint: End of reading config file /home/me/.fpc.cfg
Free Pascal Compiler version
On 10/14/2013 02:36 PM, patspiper wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Trunk and 1.0.99 branch uses latest Qt bindings v.2.5, you're using
v.2.1, so update your qt bindings and everything will be ok (libQt4Pas).
Also, if you use win32, new libQt4Pas.dll is in binaries (svn).
z.
--
On 14/10/13 16:25, zeljko wrote:
On 10/14/2013 02:36 PM, patspiper wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Trunk and 1.0.99 branch uses latest Qt bindings v.2.5, you're using
v.2.1, so update your qt bindings and everything will be ok (libQt4Pas).
Also, if you use win32, new libQt4Pas.dll is in
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:38:24AM +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
Probably because dolling up the UI is easier and gives
instant-gratification
Better than frustrating the weaker students with no gratification at all.
Why bother then, just pass them all, and forget about stressing any of
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:14:14PM -0400, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
Anyway, the whole post was meant more or less as an argument that a good
educational tool should 1) be quick to start using (so not TP) 2) not
contain parts that are not part of the course and detract too much.
How come
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 09:25:51PM -0400, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
Well, after all if it's basic course, should they use something from
Children list of this page?
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
Because you first need to teach people dos (and 8.3), console cmdline and
general concepts (stdin/stdout, working dir etc)
with proper configuration (by system administrator) the tp would be just
start and use (at
On Monday, October 14, 2013 2:27 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:14:14PM -0400, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
Anyway, the whole post was meant more or less as an argument that a good
educational tool should 1) be quick to start using (so not TP) 2)
Am 15.10.2013 01:30 schrieb Dmitry Boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com
:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl
wrote:
Because you first need to teach people dos (and 8.3), console cmdline and
general concepts (stdin/stdout, working dir etc)
with proper
12 matches
Mail list logo
