On 13-11-15 11:13 PM, K. P. wrote:
Look at your Screen object:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/lcl/forms/tscreen.html
Check out FindForm and Forms
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 22:32:37 -0500
> From: the.tail.kin...@gmail.com
> To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> Subject: [Lazarus]
Look at your Screen object:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/lcl/forms/tscreen.html
Check out FindForm and Forms
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 22:32:37 -0500
> From: the.tail.kin...@gmail.com
> To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> Subject: [Lazarus] Find Form instance with Title
>
> G
Google has failed me on this one. :( I need to check to see if a
dynamically created form (object) with a given title already exists
within the application, and if so, to raise it to the front.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freep
Hi Lazarus People!
This is my first communication with the Lazarus community, so I'd like to
start by introducing myself and saying a big thank you to everyone else
involved. Lazarus is amazing on so many levels.
My business is about computers, software development and support. I have
been u
Thanks Henry, spot on
Richard
OnIn case anyone is struggling to find it in XFCE: Settings->Window
> Manager->Keyboard. Disable the shortcut for "Workspace 9".
>
> Henry
>
> --
> ___
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> http
On 11/15/13, Michael Schnell wrote:
> In fact I consider it a waste of bandwidth to discuss a problem that
> obviously is not solvable at this length. (But who am I do complain
> about that :-[ .)
>
Of course it can be solved.
Just add a enough options (appr. 255?) to the procedure to make it
be
On 11/14/2013 04:06 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
-1
Well, everyone is entitled to his opinions, right, else we would all
be doing C :-)
In fact I consider it a waste of bandwidth to discuss a problem that
obviously is not solvable at this length. (But who am I do complain
about that :-[
On 14/11/13 17:48, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> Am 2013-11-14 07:56, schrieb Patrick Chevalley:
[...]
>
>> The julian year of 365.25 is a convenient approximation still in
>> use despite the julian calendar was abrogated some 400 years ago.
>
> Of what use would it be to use 365.25 days as a repres
