On 2014-01-04 04:34, Kostas Michalopoulos wrote:
Is there a way to ignore all these and make everything to work with
UTF-8? Like setting some global variable that makes all strings
(ansistrings) UTF-8 codepage or something
We will have to wait for FPC 2.8.0 (or 3.0) which should have much
+1
On 1/4/14, Kostas Michalopoulos badsectorac...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to ignore all these and make everything to work with
UTF-8? Like setting some global variable that makes all strings
(ansistrings) UTF-8 codepage or something that also causes any
system-specific calls (Assign,
On Sat, 4 Jan 2014, Jy V wrote:
+1
On 1/4/14, Kostas Michalopoulos badsectorac...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to ignore all these and make everything to work with
UTF-8? Like setting some global variable that makes all strings
(ansistrings) UTF-8 codepage or something that also causes
That is great, i *really* don't want to think about different
encodings between OSes and such and if i can make a UTF-8 everywhere
flag (where everywhere means LCL, FCL, RTL, Windows, Linux, OS X, etc
:-P) it would be perfect for me :-)
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
What are the known prerequisites for installing Lazarus on a KDE based
system?
I am able to build Lazarus using fpcup on existing Ubuntu 12.04 systems
running KDE, but I am unable to get it working on a newly installed system
so I suspect that some of the required libraries have not been
Hello,
I have a problem with the GTK2 widgetset: it doesn't seem to support
alpha channel. I'm using TLazIntfImage and related classes/objects
(TRawImage) to load and display images (converting from/to custom
bitmap structure to native structures so i can use them with canvas
for drawing, adding
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, vfclists . vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
What are the known prerequisites for installing Lazarus on a KDE based
system?
The prerequisites do not depend on your desktop system.
There must be devel versions for the widgetset you use.
For GTK2 it is package
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Kostas Michalopoulos
badsectorac...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the problem with (full) transparency in GTK2?
I have no idea.
Is anyone working on this?
Unfortunately not. There are only few people who know the GTK2
bindings code. We would need more contributors
On 2014-01-04 11:32, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Maybe we are not seeing something, many details...
Agreed.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/
--
___
Lazarus mailing
Just check what -lXXX are missing
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-What-are-the-prerequisites-for-compiling-Lazarus-on-a-KDE-based-system-tp4035177p4035181.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Looking in the code, I think i see the problem. The graphics
operations for GTK2 use GDK drawables which do not support alpha
blending. The bitmaps can be stored in 32bit pixbufs, but those are
not drawables and when a graphics operation is needed (drawing to a
canvas or blitting from one image to
I've made a patch that fixes the common cases (drawing an image with
an alpha channel with optional scaling and flipping). It can be
downloaded here:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25491
Here is also an image showing what this fixes:
http://i.imgur.com/FH8wbX0.png
The test program
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 10:08:07AM +, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
We will have to wait for FPC 2.8.0 (or 3.0) which should have much
better built-in Unicode support. String encoding conversion should then
be taken care of automatically. Unfortunately it seems that the FPC RTL
(there will be
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 09:32:25AM -0200, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Once that FPC release is made, then we will start seeing what
performance impact it will have on all systems. Now is too early to tell.
+1
You always said this, ie, UnicodeString should be UTF-8 on Unix
plataform and UTF-16
On 4 January 2014 14:28, leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id wrote:
Just check what -lXXX are missing
Can you explain it further?
I am building Lazarus using fpcup.
--
Frank Church
===
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
--
Is there a separate mailing list for Lazarus developers?
This mailing list appears to be mainly for Lazarus users rather than the
developers.
Is there a separate mailing list for that, or does it take place in
Bugzilla or some other place?
--
Frank Church
===
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kostas Michalopoulos
badsectorac...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made a patch that fixes the common cases (drawing an image with
an alpha channel with optional scaling and flipping).
It works well and I applied it. Thanks!
I also attached many related bug reports to
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:39 PM, vfclists . vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a separate mailing list for Lazarus developers?
Yes there is.
Can be joined by invitation only. Most of the members also have a
commit access to SVN repo.
You will be invited, too, if you became a Lazarus developer.
On 4 January 2014 22:06, Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:39 PM, vfclists . vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a separate mailing list for Lazarus developers?
Yes there is.
Can be joined by invitation only. Most of the members also have a
commit
Am 04.01.2014 19:22, schrieb Kostas Michalopoulos:
I've made a patch that fixes the common cases (drawing an image with
an alpha channel with optional scaling and flipping).
Wow, thank you very much for this patch. This bug was a steady annoyance.
Will this patch go into the upcoming 1.2
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:26 AM, vfclists . vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot of Lazarus developments and improvements, whether fully implemented or
planned go unnoticed and I wonder if this is the reason why.
What might those unnoticed developments and improvements be?
I believe this is a
On 4 January 2014 23:18, Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:26 AM, vfclists . vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot of Lazarus developments and improvements, whether fully
implemented or
planned go unnoticed and I wonder if this is the reason why.
What
On 1/5/14, Michael Fuchs freepas...@ypa-software.de wrote:
Will this patch go into the upcoming 1.2 Version?
If you want to make sure it is at least considered, then add it to the
merge requests on
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.2_fixes_branch
Bart
--
On 05/01/2014 00:48, vfclists . wrote:
I have always had this nagging feeling that something wasn't quite
right about Lazarus and this explains it. I have been using Lazarus on
and off for about 4 years now. From the start I don't think I used
more the 10% of what Lazarus offered and in the
On 05/01/2014 00:48, vfclists . wrote:
I think being able to see what is coming and follow their development
will encourage more participants and more bug fixing as well.
In any case if Lazarus developers feel that this approach has proved
to be the best over the years then they are entitled
On 1/4/2014 4:37 PM, vfclists . wrote:
On 4 January 2014 14:28, leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id
mailto:leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id wrote:
Just check what -lXXX are missing
Can you explain it further?
I am building Lazarus using fpcup.
+1!!n i'm running into similar situations
26 matches
Mail list logo
