On 2014-02-12 10:40, Michael Schnell wrote:
>
> But I never was able to generate the files for DocView from the current
> revisions of the SVNs.
Last time I tried (a couple months back) the LCL docs wasn't in a state
that could be built - or it was a fpdoc bug not yet resolve. I'll update
to the
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:53:30 +0100
Lubos Pintes wrote:
> Hello,
> So now it looks like this: someone mentioned that I have a path of old
> 2.6.0 compiler in mi "PATH" variable. That was true, I removed the
> directory from the "PATH", and also removed whole Lazarus configuration
> from mi user
On 18/02/14 18:53, Lubos Pintes wrote:
Hello,
So now it looks like this: someone mentioned that I have a path of old
2.6.0 compiler in mi "PATH" variable. That was true, I removed the
directory from the "PATH", and also removed whole Lazarus
configuration from mi users folder. Just FYI, the 2.
Hello,
So now it looks like this: someone mentioned that I have a path of old
2.6.0 compiler in mi "PATH" variable. That was true, I removed the
directory from the "PATH", and also removed whole Lazarus configuration
from mi users folder. Just FYI, the 2.6.0 dir was in the path, but I
uninstal
Does someone knows an open source rating control (similar to
http://www.planet-source-code.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=74089&lngWId=1)
A TTrackBar that shows the tick value below the tick mark also fit my needs
Luiz
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 18/02/2014 16:33, Martin Frb wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 14:38, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>> 2)ARM:
>>> pascal script has some support, it may be fixable, but I can not test...
>> TBH, I'm not interested in testing it either. I'll just keep it disabled
>> for all platforms in my default fpcup settin
On 18/02/2014 14:38, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
2)ARM:
pascal script has some support, it may be fixable, but I can not test...
TBH, I'm not interested in testing it either. I'll just keep it disabled
for all platforms in my default fpcup settings then.
I look at disabling it, (if I remember)
On 18/02/2014 15:34, Martin Frb wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 12:01, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> On 12/02/2014 17:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>> Just tested on ARM (ARMHF, with FPC trunk), Laz trunk. Noticed Martin's
>> fix that still allows compilation on ARM.
>> Compiling the IDE went ok.
>> Starting
On 18/02/2014 12:01, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 12/02/2014 17:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I find that trunk+2.71 won't build as bigide, since PascalScript has no
sparc.inc and it attempts to build for x86. I've raided this as
http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25709 and suggest that for
On 12/02/2014 17:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I find that trunk+2.71 won't build as bigide, since PascalScript has no
> sparc.inc and it attempts to build for x86. I've raided this as
> http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25709 and suggest that for the
> moment PscalScript is excluded for th
On 16/02/2014 21:45, Bart wrote:
> On 2/16/14, Maxim Ganetsky wrote:
>
>> ... Nobody
>> tests compilation with 2.6.4 RC1, so I wouldn't recommend to use it.
>
> We were politely asked to test 2.6.4RC1, so we did.
> And we report these errors...
> If we wouldn't have, the what?
AFAIU, Marco com
In my Lazarus Version the LazDebuggerGdbmi package is not on the list.
Adding DebugerIntf alone worked fine.
Lazarus 44121
FPC 2.6.2-5
i386-linux-gtk 2
Thanks for your help.
Corpsman
On 02/17/2014 08:29 PM, Martin Frb wrote:
On 17/02/2014 18:43, patspiper wrote:
On 17/02/14 20:27, Junior wrot
12 matches
Mail list logo
