Re: [Lazarus] LazUtils - TProcessUTF8 - UTF8 Parameters issue

2014-06-29 Thread Michael Thompson
> At some point in time I have thougth about completely re-implementing > TProcessUTF8 just for that reason but it would mean so much duplicate > code (which is a nightmare for maintainers). > And all this would then become obsolete once fpc 2.8 comes around > So, I gave up. By 2am last night

Re: [Lazarus] Accessibility of Lazarus

2014-06-29 Thread Lubos Pintes
Hi Greg and all, A long time ago, (more than one year I think), I researched about accessibility in Lazarus. Unfortunately I just noticed that I lost, or totally forgot almost everything about this subject :). But I remembered the following. - There is very basic TLazAccessible object implemen

Re: [Lazarus] LazUtils - TProcessUTF8 - UTF8 Parameters issue

2014-06-29 Thread Bart
On 6/29/14, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> I'm strongly leaning towards the possibility that this isn't going to >> work until win\process.inc itself is upgraded to be unicode aware (ie >> use CreateProcessW, upgrade CommandToList, and possibly other fixes). > I would suspect this to be the case, y

Re: [Lazarus] LazUtils - TProcessUTF8 - UTF8 Parameters issue

2014-06-29 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 29/06/2014 11:08, Michael Thompson wrote: > I'm strongly leaning towards the possibility that this isn't going to > work until win\process.inc itself is upgraded to be unicode aware (ie > use CreateProcessW, upgrade CommandToList, and possibly other fixes). I would suspect this to be the case, y

Re: [Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?

2014-06-29 Thread Giuliano Colla
Il 29/06/2014 09:40, Sven Barth ha scritto: [...] Am 29.06.2014 01:43 schrieb "Giuliano Colla" mailto:giuliano.co...@fastwebnet.it>>: > >However the sources are left untouched. I believe this be a sign of good design, from the >Borland's good old times... As I said I don't think that's nece

Re: [Lazarus] LazUtils - TProcessUTF8 - UTF8 Parameters issue

2014-06-29 Thread Michael Thompson
> I answered in the forum. > > Bart Aye, thanks for that. More information. I have now tried every combination of AnsiToUTF8(), UTF8ToAnsi(), SysToUTF8(), UTF8ToSys() and just simply FFilename in both TProcess and TProcessUTF8. All failed (and you can see my machine gun approach confirms my uni

Re: [Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?

2014-06-29 Thread Sven Barth
Am 29.06.2014 01:43 schrieb "Giuliano Colla" : > > Il 28/06/2014 20:30, Marco van de Voort ha scritto: > >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:40:35PM +0200, Giuliano Colla wrote: >>> >>> Sorry for the misunderstanding. I did consider this possibility because >>> we have hundreds of Kylix projects which ar