Re: [Lazarus] Request for review patch #27921

2015-10-14 Thread LacaK
Dňa 14.10.2015 o 22:56 patspiper napísal(a): On 13/10/15 09:28, LacaK wrote: Hi, I am not sure if this is proper maillist to write this kind of request. Can please somebody review patch in bug report http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27921 and if no objections commit them. The patch doe

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Bo Berglund
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:48:14 -0300, Flávio Etrusco wrote: >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Bo Berglund wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:13:53 +0300, Juha Manninen >> wrote: >> >> $ time make clean bigide >> >> I have never seen such a command before, does it print the time the >> command foll

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Bo Berglund wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:13:53 +0300, Juha Manninen > wrote: > > $ time make clean bigide > > I have never seen such a command before, does it print the time the > command following time takes to complete??? > man time does not mention such a f

Re: [Lazarus] what can be wrong in this code? (qrobjects.pas)

2015-10-14 Thread Juha Manninen
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote: > Since freeman hasn't created a bug report and I am too lazy to write one > myself, I sent the patch here. Applied in r50063, thanks. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepa

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Juha Manninen
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Bo Berglund wrote: > 3) Build lazarus. > How do I do this in the circumstances mentioned above? If you have a native FPC installed then "make bigide" in the source dir should be enough. If you have some cross-compiler setup then I don't know. You should also read

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Marc Santhoff
On Mi, 2015-10-14 at 22:58 +0200, Bo Berglund wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:13:53 +0300, Juha Manninen > wrote: > > $ time make clean bigide > > I have never seen such a command before, does it print the time the > command following time takes to complete??? > man time does not mention such a

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Bo Berglund
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:13:53 +0300, Juha Manninen wrote: $ time make clean bigide I have never seen such a command before, does it print the time the command following time takes to complete??? man time does not mention such a functionality... -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden --

Re: [Lazarus] Request for review patch #27921

2015-10-14 Thread patspiper
On 13/10/15 09:28, LacaK wrote: Hi, I am not sure if this is proper maillist to write this kind of request. Can please somebody review patch in bug report http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27921 and if no objections commit them. The patch doesn't work on my WinCE device. I would like Bar

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Bo Berglund
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:55:13 +0300, Juha Manninen wrote: >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Bo Berglund wrote: >> Even if the original make was done as su? > >No, then the generated files are owned by root and cannot be deleted >by normal users. >You should delete those files and switch to a norm

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Ondrej Pokorny
On 14.10.2015 20:24, Anthony Walter wrote: Ondrej, Fantastic! That's exactly what I (and maybe some others) were looking for. When you check it in please reply with the revision number so I can svn diff to see only your changes. I'd be interested in reviewing them. Hopefully your addition can

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Marcos Douglas
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote: > On 12.10.2015 20:19, Anthony Walter wrote: >> >> I'll looked at CodeTools, attempted changes, and rapidly gave up after >> trying to work through all kinds of confusion. >> >> Earlier this year I offered to try once again if only I could get

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Anthony Walter
Ondrej, Fantastic! That's exactly what I (and maybe some others) were looking for. When you check it in please reply with the revision number so I can svn diff to see only your changes. I'd be interested in reviewing them. Hopefully your addition can shed some light on how to modify CodeTools for

[Lazarus] Why is AsyncProcess still disabled under Linux I386?

2015-10-14 Thread Kiên Nguyễn Tiến Trung
Today I have just faced a same problem in the following article: http://lazarus.lazarus.freepascal.narkive.com/dCiCiyW2/tasyncprocess-onterminate-doesn-t-fire {$IFNDEF DisableAsyncProcess} {$IFDEF Linux} {$IFDEF CPUI386} *{off $DEFINE UseAsyncProcess}*{$ENDIF} {$ENDIF} {$ENDIF} Why is UseAsyncP

Re: [Lazarus] what can be wrong in this code? (qrobjects.pas)

2015-10-14 Thread Ondrej Pokorny
On 14.10.2015 13:22, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:41:30 +0300 FreeMan wrote: >[...] >note: >after this error, in editor toolbar I have "Open packages of current >unit" icon, its start blink.? I see this too under Linux/Gtk2. Since freeman hasn't created a bug report and I

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Juha Manninen
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Bo Berglund wrote: > Even if the original make was done as su? No, then the generated files are owned by root and cannot be deleted by normal users. You should delete those files and switch to a normal user. Building any programs as root is unusual and not recomme

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Ondrej Pokorny
On 12.10.2015 20:19, Anthony Walter wrote: I'll looked at CodeTools, attempted changes, and rapidly gave up after trying to work through all kinds of confusion. Earlier this year I offered to try once again if only I could get a little help/tutelage but no follow up contact was made. The offer

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Bo Berglund
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:56:59 +0300, Juha Manninen wrote: >There is no need to install Lazarus when using (and occationally >updating) the trunk version. >Just compile it in the directory where sources are. Then run the >binary from there. >Sudo is not needed for anything. > Even if the original m

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Juha Manninen
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Bo Berglund wrote: > # cd /usr/local/lazarus > # svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk source > # cd /usr/local/lazarus/source > # make all OPT=-dFPC_ARMHF > # make install OPT=-dFPC_ARMHF PREFIX=/usr/local ... > Notice that it was done as sudo su

Re: [Lazarus] what can be wrong in this code? (qrobjects.pas)

2015-10-14 Thread Ondrej Pokorny
On 14.10.2015 13:22, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:41:30 +0300 FreeMan wrote: [...] note: after this error, in editor toolbar I have "Open packages of current unit" icon, its start blink.? I see this too under Linux/Gtk2. Juha? Probably my problem. Ondrej -- _

Re: [Lazarus] what can be wrong in this code? (qrobjects.pas)

2015-10-14 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:41:30 +0300 FreeMan wrote: >[...] > note: > after this error, in editor toolbar I have "Open packages of current > unit" icon, its start blink.? I see this too under Linux/Gtk2. Juha? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazar

[Lazarus] what can be wrong in this code? (qrobjects.pas)

2015-10-14 Thread FreeMan
fpc r32025 lazarus r50043 qtx64 /opt/lazarus/lcl/interfaces/qt/qtobjects.pas line 3088 //if vFont <> nil then if Assigned(vFont)then begin if vFont.FHandle <> nil then <-- İn orjinal code I get access voilation , while debuging, move mouse on vFont its viewing "nil" but if c

Re: [Lazarus] Disable auto identifier completion of 1 identifier

2015-10-14 Thread Ondrej Pokorny
On 14.10.2015 11:07, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:36:44 +0200 Ondrej Pokorny wrote: [...] At | I hit Ctrl+Space. No identifier completion window is shown and the idetifier is automatically completed to "MyVerySpecialVar". If there is no way to disable it: Mattias, where is t

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Sven Barth
Am 14.10.2015 09:28 schrieb "Bo Berglund" : > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:51:22 +0300, Juha Manninen > wrote: > > > > >Bigide is used for Lazarus release versions. Why is it confusing? > > Did I do it wrong? > This is what I did (following an online tutorial): > > # cd /usr/local/lazarus > # svn co h

Re: [Lazarus] Disable auto identifier completion of 1 identifier

2015-10-14 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:36:44 +0200 Ondrej Pokorny wrote: >[...] > At | I hit Ctrl+Space. No identifier completion window is shown and the > idetifier is automatically completed to "MyVerySpecialVar". > > If there is no way to disable it: Mattias, where is the check done that > there is only on

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:29:50 +0200 Ondrej Pokorny wrote: > On 14.10.2015 10:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > > If you'd used make bigide there would have been extra packages built > > by default, giving you things like database and RTTI support. > > Do you mean RTTI controls or > http://wiki.la

[Lazarus] Disable auto identifier completion of 1 identifier

2015-10-14 Thread Ondrej Pokorny
Hello! Is there a simple way how to disable automatic identifier completion if there is only one item in the identifier completion window. I mean: var MyVerySpecialVar: Integer; begin MyVeryS| At | I hit Ctrl+Space. No identifier completion window is shown and the idetifier is automatic

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Ondrej Pokorny
On 14.10.2015 10:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: If you'd used make bigide there would have been extra packages built by default, giving you things like database and RTTI support. Do you mean RTTI controls or http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Projects_for_the_Google_Summer_of_Code#Implement_sup

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Bo Berglund wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:51:22 +0300, Juha Manninen wrote: Bigide is used for Lazarus release versions. Why is it confusing? Did I do it wrong? This is what I did (following an online tutorial): # cd /usr/local/lazarus # svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk so

Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion about environmentoptions.xml

2015-10-14 Thread FreeMan
On 13.10.2015 18:44, Juha Manninen wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: What settings a user wants to move to another OS varies widely. Maybe implement a dialog, where the user can select what to export. Yes, the export/import stuff needs attention. The Desktop mana

[Lazarus] Microsoft Security Essentials

2015-10-14 Thread Aradeonas
Hi, Did you have a problem with this when compiling and debugging? Microsoft Security Essentials cpu goes hi and debugging will take longer than usual. Regards, Ara -- http://www.fastmail.com - The professional email service -- ___ Lazarus mailing li

Re: [Lazarus] Theoretical question about future of Lazarus

2015-10-14 Thread Bo Berglund
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:51:22 +0300, Juha Manninen wrote: > >Bigide is used for Lazarus release versions. Why is it confusing? Did I do it wrong? This is what I did (following an online tutorial): # cd /usr/local/lazarus # svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk source # cd /usr/local

[Lazarus] Microsoft Security Essentials

2015-10-14 Thread Aradeonas
Hi, Did you have a problem with this when compiling and debugging? Microsoft Security Essentials cpu foes hi and debugging will take longer than usual. Regards, Ara -- http://www.fastmail.com - Send your email first class -- ___ Lazarus mailing list