On 26/10/2015 22:56 μμ, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 10/26/2015 03:31 PM, mic...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Monday 26 October 2015 20:13:49 schrieb wkitt...@windstream.net:
scrypt
http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/crchash_en.html
the license on that one is too restrictive :(
What is so restri
Dear Michel:
I have used de cmen in the uses section of the .lpr. it is correct?
Thanks in advance
Saludos,
Ing. Héctor Fiandor
hfian...@ceniai.inf.cu
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.or
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:16:47 +0100
John Landmesser wrote:
> if i start my new compiled Lazarus on windows:
>
> Lazarus 1.5 r50173 FPC 2.6.4 i386-win32-win32/win64
> Optimized IDE:
> -O2 -g- -Xs
>
> it doesn't start up with error dialog ..."Risk of data-loss" ok and cancel
>
> Am i the only one
As I said it curiosity.
Regards,
Ara
--
http://www.fastmail.com - The way an email service should be
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Aradeonas wrote:
Thanks, so asking out of curiosity if I want really free memory I should
write a custom memory manager?
You can. But why would you, if cmem suites your needs ?
Michael.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lis
On 10/26/2015 03:31 PM, mic...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Monday 26 October 2015 20:13:49 schrieb wkitt...@windstream.net:
scrypt
http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/crchash_en.html
the license on that one is too restrictive :(
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*
Thanks, so asking out of curiosity if I want really free memory I should
write a custom memory manager?
Ara
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Same, same, but different...
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazar
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Aradeonas wrote:
Thanks.
cmem will clean memory much better.
It uses a different strategy. It is not necessarily the better.
It depends what you care about.
App start with 2mb that is less than 3mb without cmem and goes up to
18mb that again is less than 25mb in previo
Am Monday 26 October 2015 20:13:49 schrieb wkitt...@windstream.net:
> scrypt
http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/crchash_en.html
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
i've found scrypt for delphi but desire to use it cross-platform and don't know
enough about removing stuff for windows... is there an scrypt available for FPC
or lazarus that is easily implemented and used?
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please kee
Thanks.
cmem will clean memory much better.
App start with 2mb that is less than 3mb without cmem and goes up to
18mb that again is less than 25mb in previous example and after
destroying all the items it will decrease to 3mb that is much better
result although there is 1mb extra memory usage
Mich
Yes you are right,It is in the last version of Lazarus or your nightly
build but not in regular versions.
Regards, Ara
--
http://www.fastmail.com - mmm... Fastmail...
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazar
A) Open one file from the package
shortcuts:
Ctrl + Click on unit name or
Ctrl + Enter with caret on unit name
Double click a file name in the package editor
B) Search > Find in Files then Where > [X] Directories (checked)
shortcuts:
Ctrl + Shift + F
... and the directory will
Hi,
Is there this option anywhere in Lazarus?
Regards, Ara
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and folders
wherever you are
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.l
On 26.10.2015 16:02, Zeljko wrote:
gtk+2 2.24.28
glib2 2.44.1
Can you start lazarus via gdb and send backtrace ?
Buld lazarus with -gl and
gdb ./lazarus
run
---crash
bt
now copy backtrace here
zeljko
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@list
Thank you.
Vào 18-10-2015 22:11, "Mattias Gaertner" đã
viết:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:18:12 +0700
> Kiên Nguyễn Tiến Trung wrote:
>
> > I have been successful to save a component to a text file. However, I
> have
> > a problem while reading them back.
> >
> > To illustrate, this is the text file
On 10/26/2015 03:13 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
It is only ever your replies that includes such *SPAM* prefix. So it
seems your mail transport service, mail server or email client is
adding it - not everybody else's.
Happily I was pointed to a Thunderbird plugin that cleans up the mail
subje
gtk+2 2.24.28
glib2 2.44.1
Can you start lazarus via gdb and send backtrace ?
Buld lazarus with -gl and
gdb ./lazarus
run
---crash
bt
now copy backtrace here
zeljko
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://list
On 26.10.2015 15:31, Zeljko wrote:
On 10/26/2015 02:35 PM, Tomaž Žveglič wrote:
When I run lazarus this error is displayed:
# ./lazarus
(lazarus:32495): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion
'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
[FOR
On 10/26/2015 02:35 PM, Tomaž Žveglič wrote:
When I run lazarus this error is displayed:
# ./lazarus
(lazarus:32495): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion
'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
[FORMS.PP] ExceptionOccurred
Sender=E
On 2015-10-26 09:59, Michael Schnell wrote:
> *Everybody* should remove that nonsense before sending.
It is only ever your replies that includes such *SPAM* prefix. So it
seems your mail transport service, mail server or email client is adding
it - not everybody else's.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
On 26.10.2015 14:45, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:35:21 +0100
Tomaž Žveglič wrote:
OS: OpenBSD bsd 5.8 GENERIC#1170 amd64
lazarus was compiled using fpc 2.6.4:
[...]
When I run lazarus this error is displayed:
# ./lazarus
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:35:21 +0100
Tomaž Žveglič wrote:
> OS: OpenBSD bsd 5.8 GENERIC#1170 amd64
>
> lazarus was compiled using fpc 2.6.4:
>[...]
> When I run lazarus this error is displayed:
>
> # ./lazarus
>
> (lazarus:32495): GLib-GObject-
OS: OpenBSD bsd 5.8 GENERIC#1170 amd64
lazarus was compiled using fpc 2.6.4:
-
# pkg_add gmake
# pkg_add gdk-pixbuf
# pkg_add gtk+2
# pkg_add fpc
# tar -xzvpf lazarus-1.4.4-0.tar.gz
# cd lazarus
# gmake clean bigide
-
Compila
if i start my new compiled Lazarus on windows:
Lazarus 1.5 r50173 FPC 2.6.4 i386-win32-win32/win64
Optimized IDE:
-O2 -g- -Xs
it doesn't start up with error dialog ..."Risk of data-loss" ok and cancel
All other compile options: "Debug" and "Normal" are ok.
That only happens with "Optimized ID
Michael Schnell wrote:
Any Linux Desktop software uses an X interface as a display. Hence an X
server is running.
This would probably be a good place to point out (for the benefit of
less experienced users) that X's terminology is a bit odd: an "X server"
provides graphics services to progra
On 10/26/2015 12:17 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
but if- when it gets to you- the message you're commenting to is
already annotated that suggests that it's being done by your service
provider to your incoming (not outgoing) messages.
This obviously is the case. :-)
-Michael (hating these in
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 10/26/2015 11:36 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Your mail today regarding the widgetset initialization added yet
another "*SPAM*" for example.
I see. The I answered to already did have the addition. So somebody
installed an inappropriate spam filter in the mail infrastructure.
Bo Berglund wrote:
Now we're getting somewhere.
Never was able to install and use Xming for example.
Do you have a suggestion as to which X-server I could run on Windows7
instead of using VNC?
I think you said you're using PuTTY, so start off with whatever
documentation that provides: I'm f
On 10/26/2015 11:51 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
1) Control relays via the GPIO connector on the RPi2. Done OK
Of course this is rather appropriately done on the target.
2) Create a TCPIP communications object..
This is an example of what should be done on a Linux PC. It does not
involve any hardw
On 10/26/2015 11:36 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Your mail today regarding the widgetset initialization added yet
another "*SPAM*" for example.
I see. The I answered to already did have the addition. So somebody
installed an inappropriate spam filter in the mail infrastructure.
I'll try to take care
Am 2015-10-26 um 11:36 schrieb Sven Barth:
If you look at this month's archive you'll see that it's only your mails that add this
(see here: http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2015-October/thread.html
). Your mail today regarding the widgetset initialization added yet another
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:29:35 +0100, Michael Schnell
wrote:
This might actually be a bit off topic for this thread, which I
created in order to report a Lazarus IDE problem rather than
discussing my development issues...
But anyway:
>As I suggested before, you should first do the porting complete
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:47:01 -0400
Anthony Tekatch wrote:
> > File-Print calls up the print dialog, but nothing gets printed when the
> > Print button is clicked.
>
> Resolved:
> my ~/tmp directory was not writeable (owned by root) and only the sample
> project rawmodetest showed the error. Chan
Am 26.10.2015 10:59 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 10/26/2015 10:09 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>>
>> The point is that it is annoying. If you don't know how to fix it, then
please remove it before you send the mail.
>
> I am rather sure that it's not added to the thread by my postings.
*Everyb
Am 26.10.2015 09:29 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 10/23/2015 05:01 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>>
>> It will depend on the specific initialization whether it can do any
harm (especially with the widgetset not initialized) if left in...
>>
> So you suggest that they would not do any API calls to
On 10/26/2015 10:09 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The point is that it is annoying. If you don't know how to fix it,
then please remove it before you send the mail.
I am rather sure that it's not added to the thread by my postings.
*Everybody* should remove that nonsense before sending.
-Michae
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:34:00 +0100, Michael Schnell
wrote:
>On 10/24/2015 11:25 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
>> except for the clipboard that is supposed to be
>> shared between the two systems.
>This rather obviously is is not an FPC or Lazarus problem but introduced
>by Tight VNC and hence should
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 10/26/2015 10:09 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
No, as I've said before...
Seemingly this mail is not in the List.
22nd October.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
--
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:00:15 +0100, Bo Berglund
wrote:
>"Debugger Error
>Ooops, the debugger entered the error state.
>Save your work now!
>Hit Stop and hope the best, we're pulling the plug."
>
It seems like I found the problem cause...
I did not in fact run the application yesterday, it was tw
As I suggested before, you should first do the porting completely on a
Linux PC, avoiding such cut/paste and hundreds of other problems.
As you stated before, that you already have a running PC Linux, Here you
have an X-server, the small board can attach to via TCP/IP in the
standard UNIX way.
On 10/26/2015 10:09 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
If you want to do significant amounts of cut-and-paste then run
Lazarus over SSH (i.e. so that the Lazarus UI is being presented by
the local X server). If that introduces a significant performance hit
then report it as a bug, it's something t
On 2015-10-26 09:59, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
My fault. Sorry.
Fixed.
Thank you for the quick fix! :)
-Torsten.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 10/26/2015 10:09 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
No, as I've said before...
Seemingly this mail is not in the List.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazar
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:01:31 +0100
Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 08:34 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
> >
> >
> > That's why I'm asking the participant to adjust his email client,
> > rather than doing anything on my end.
> >
> >
> The *SPAM* addition to the subject supposedly is not add
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 10/24/2015 11:25 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
except for the clipboard that is supposed to be
shared between the two systems.
This rather obviously is is not an FPC or Lazarus problem but introduced
by Tight VNC and hence should be discussed elsewhere. Maybe a greater
VNC
On 10/23/2015 10:15 PM, Martin Frb wrote:
Well my email client does sort them correct.
I doubt that there is any automatic that can avoid this.:-(
Se everybody should delete that addition from the subject when replying.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mail
On 10/23/2015 08:34 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
That's why I'm asking the participant to adjust his email client,
rather than doing anything on my end.
The *SPAM* addition to the subject supposedly is not added by any mail
client (at least I am sure that the Thunderbird I am using does n
I tried to run my test application (a console program based on
TCustomApplication) from the Lazarus window today in order to gather
info for asking about the problems I have had.
Lazarus 1.5 is running on a Raspberry Pi2 under Raspbian Jessie.
What happens when I hit the Run button is the followin
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:43:58 +0100
Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> After a recent update of Lazarus SVN (rev. 50168) I have started getting
> errors when I want
> to display the list of forms using Shift + F12 (View Project Forms).
>
> Lazarus tries to open form that do not ex
Hi List.
After a recent update of Lazarus SVN (rev. 50168) I have started getting
errors when I want
to display the list of forms using Shift + F12 (View Project Forms).
Lazarus tries to open form that do not exists:
The file "epidatamanager.lpr" exists and is my main project file, but
natu
On 10/24/2015 11:25 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
except for the clipboard that is supposed to be
shared between the two systems.
This rather obviously is is not an FPC or Lazarus problem but introduced
by Tight VNC and hence should be discussed elsewhere. Maybe a greater
VNC Version would work bett
On 10/23/2015 05:01 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
It will depend on the specific initialization whether it can do any
harm (especially with the widgetset not initialized) if left in...
So you suggest that they would not do any API calls to any external
Widget Set that in the target environment migh
53 matches
Mail list logo