Am 02.01.2016 01:13 schrieb "Anthony Walter" :
>
> Michael,
>
> I don't want a "visual" table builder and I'm unsure how many others do.
All I want is something to connect me to a database engine where I can then
execute bits of SQL (it executes what you highlight), which is what my
program does.
On 2016-01-02 00:11, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I've yet to see a GUI frontend which is remotely usable when
> attached to a table with a few billion rows.
Then I guess you have never seen the setting in most GUI frontends that
limit the return result to say 500 records max. All the GUI SQL Edito
On 2016-01-02 00:10, Anthony Walter wrote:
> Straight off I don't see a SQL
> editor either.
It of course has that - the Laz Data Desktop just doesn't have a very
intuitive interface. It also has some bugs or oddities. But saying that,
it also has some useful features like extendible code generati
On 2016-01-01 23:10, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> now there will be again 2 half tools...
Plus one more "whole tool" from tiOPF (tiSQLEditor). ;-) Been using it
for years and it connects to any SQL database tiOPF supports (personally
I've used SQL-Server, Firebird, Oracle, Postgress and [ashamed]
K.P.,
Being able to connect to MSSL from Linux is kinda of the point. Installing
Wine + setup or configuration of ODBC DSN configuration files and or
drivers just to run a SQL client+editor kinda files into the "require a
whole lot of extras" category.
--
__
I use HeidiSQL for such purposes - but it is not natively cross-platform :(
Other than that, it is very usable and very stable
> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 21:04:00 -0200
> From: m...@delfire.net
> To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Cross Platform SQL Client/Editor
>
>
Mark,
I apologize if I was unclear. I didn't mean to imply some kind of SQL
editor which can convert between various SQL dialects (T-SQL -> ?). I want
something with a good syntax highlight editor (with block indent/mouse
selection, and so on) which allows me to execute the SQL that is
highlighted
Michael,
I don't want a "visual" table builder and I'm unsure how many others do.
All I want is something to connect me to a database engine where I can then
execute bits of SQL (it executes what you highlight), which is what my
program does.
Lazarus database desktop seems geared towards everythi
Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Anthony Walter wrote:
If the pickings are slim in answer to Question 1, are they many people here
who want a simple cross platform SQL client/editor, possibly with both MySQL
and MSSQL support?
I don't use Linux for development (yet) but I
Very strange and somewhat disappointing to read.
why did you not use/improve the lazarus database desktop ?
that is what it is for?
Why not improve existing tools ? by fragmenting more, now there will be again 2
half tools...
Michael.
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016, Anthony Walter wrote:
A few months
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Anthony Walter wrote:
> If the pickings are slim in answer to Question 1, are they many people here
> who want a simple cross platform SQL client/editor, possibly with both MySQL
> and MSSQL support?
I don't use Linux for development (yet) but I work with MSSQL eve
A few months ago I was trying to find a workable Microsoft SQL Server
client/editor on Linux and couldn't find anything decent in the FOSS zone.
I ended up writing my own simple SQL client/editor:
http://cache.getlazarus.org/images/sqlclient.png
The basic functionality is/was:
Connect to a serve
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:32:03 +0100
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> Lazarus 1.6 RC1:
> If I have a bookmark in a file that has not (yet) been opened in the
> source editor shouldn't the file be opened when I jump to this bookmark?
> It's quite annoying that nothing happens and I only find out later that
Lazarus 1.6 RC1:
If I have a bookmark in a file that has not (yet) been opened in the
source editor shouldn't the file be opened when I jump to this bookmark?
It's quite annoying that nothing happens and I only find out later that
this is not because the bookmark was deleted but simply because the
14 matches
Mail list logo