On 2012-09-30 16:08, Bernd wrote:
> I made a Lazarus package for creating Debian packages from Lazarus projects:
Thank you very much! Exactly what I needed as an old-time Debian
GNU/Linux-man.
Grx HdV
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.
On 2012-09-10 23:37, J.A. de Vries wrote:
> You might be right. I seem to remember that the native perl
> implementation of getopts parses the argumentstring as a plain string
> and builds from that. I could be wrong though. I'll look it up later
> this week, as soon as I can f
On 2012-09-10 17:59, Bernd wrote:
> 2012/9/10 J.A. de Vries :
>
>> Might I make a suggestion? Why try and invent the wheel ourselves?
>> There's a very good library named getopts that has been used by masses
>> of programmers for years now. Maybe we could learn from
On 2012-09-10 17:39, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
> We have this unit (getopt, it is documented?). But the code for that is
> for the receiving end, i.e. used by the program that is started. Not for
> the program that starts another program.
Thanks for the clear explanation of the situation.
On 2012-09-10 15:19, patspiper wrote:
>>
>> Your message is a very good example why the whole splitting and escaping
>> approach was abandonned. Every issue was considered to be "just add
>> this,
>> since then it works for me now", but after multiple years of such
>> changes,
>> there are still
Hi,
I am not really sure if this type of message is appreciated on this list or
not. I tried looking it up on the Lazarus-site, but didn't find anything on it.
My apologies if you think I shouldn't have sent this.
Quite a few years ago I was a reasonably decent Delphi programmer. But after
my
