On 09/24/2015 02:22 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
My first test was aginst our CVS server on port 2401
Just for testing if a socket can receive data you can use any server in
the Internet port 80 :-)
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 09/24/2015 02:55 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
any server in the Internet port 80 :-)
or even better set up the Linux that you will need anyway. Linux always
comes with telnet to a command line installed. You just need to activate
it.
-Michael
On 09/23/2015 04:21 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have used the AsyncPro com port also and I noted that there is a
TCP/IP version of the com port as well (ApdWinsockPort) such that
using this in Delphi would make it possible to just switch from one to
the other by setting a property.
It would be
On 09/23/2015 07:37 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
The MSEgui socket components (and the pipe reader and RS232 components
too BTW) implement the model Michael describes.
For Delphi we (company) use AsyncPro (as well for RS232 as for TCP/IP)
(Initially provided commercially by TurboPower, but
On 09/22/2015 11:16 AM, Marc Weustink wrote:
The Lazarus services I run here at work have zero GUI dependency.
Of course you can do programs that don't have a GUI dependency (e.g. a
Service/Daemon) using Lazarus.
The question discussed is whether it is possible to use the "Event
On 09/21/2015 06:08 PM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
pport. Please compile
MSEide with -dmse_with_ifirem in order to activate them.
It also has "tnoguiapplication" in order to build daemon applications with an
event loop where all nonvisual components including ttimer can be used.
That is really
On 09/21/2015 04:42 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Unfortunately since the existing code is built on non-blocking serial
communications and events to handle the data reception ...
You can convert a blocking socket (or serial port receive) to be a
non-blocking Event-triggering (i.e. Delphi-Paradigm
On 09/21/2015 05:16 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
I don't really know how Telnet could tie in here.
"Telnet" is just a synonym for "transfer Bytes via TCP/IP without any
additional higher protocol".
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 09/21/2015 07:05 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Fine, then I just need to make it visible inside Lazarus...
I suppose you mean "accessible".
Is it not enough to include the appropriate unit in the "uses" clause ?
If not, I suppose you just need to add the file to the search path.
-Michael
--
On 09/22/2015 11:33 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The answer is: Yes, it is.
I never saw a Linux project without GUI binding that use TTimer. (Other
than my own TTimer implementation, done in a compatible way.)
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing
On 09/22/2015 11:48 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Michael said it is possible, and I agree.
Of course I do know. I did it myself (doing my version of TTimer and
some more EventQueue enabled functions)
Martin Schreiber told you
many times in the past MSEgui's TTimer can be used in non-GUI
On 09/22/2015 11:43 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Now you are approaching “dangerous” territory. :-)
Right, but RAD does not require Event Programming, nor makes Event
Programming a project "RAD" !
OTHO you can of course state that preferring Event Programming over
fully user managed code is
On 09/22/2015 12:32 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
RAD does not require Event Programming, nor makes Event Programming a
project "RAD
To me "RAD" more means stuff like doing the "business logic" code
directly in the unit that is used for the GUI handling.
(Usi
Bo later said:
"As described my Windows application is a service"
I am rather positive that a Delphi "Service Application" can do TTimer etc.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 09/18/2015 12:06 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Could you please post your Delphi test for that? Thanks.
You are correct that this does not work in the way I assumed.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 09/18/2015 06:19 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Or is there a better way on Linux?
A typical Linux way in fact is doing a cron job. A common Unix paradigm
is to do any functionality in a small dedicated "run through" executable
and chain those via pipes and/or call them via system functionality
On 09/21/2015 02:56 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Just for clarification: Synchronize() is not only for GUI
Same is true for TThread.Queue and Application.QueueAsyncCall, as well.
All three (from the user's point of view) do similar stuff: schedule an
event that is executed in the main thread
On 09/21/2015 01:26 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Wow, a Service Application in Delphi (unlike under FPC - at least for
*nix) seems to be a full-on GUI application, just without a UI.
... because this is easy to do in Windows, but not that easy in Linux ;-)
The Lazarus team did a great job but
On 09/21/2015 12:48 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
No it doesn't...
Sorry if I am wrong here. I do know that colleagues of mine do Services
in Delphi by doing normal GUI applications that definitively do use
TTimer, and in the end just do a small modification to have them run as
Services.
I
On 09/21/2015 01:50 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Just to be clear, using threads in this case didn't require
Synchronize() either - because Synchronize() is purely there for GUI
apps, which this wasn't.
Of course it is *possible* (it even is _possible_ to code a complete
application with a
On 09/21/2015 04:07 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
So you are totally wrong in your argument.
This argument had been pointing against myself, as it invalidates my
effort to do an ActiveNoGui WidgetType I had been requesting at the time
I investigated about porting a large embedded Delphi
On 09/21/2015 04:42 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
I take your comment as meaning there are other platforms where FPC
also runs, right?
Yep. You can always switch to another ARM/Linux board with not much
porting effort.
The intrument has already been modified by replacing the serial port
by an
On 09/21/2015 04:48 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
So I thought that maybe I could do the same here and have something
that a main program created natively in Python for instance could use.
Of course you _can_ do DLLs / sos for inter-language linking. But then
they need a "standard" "flat" interface
On 09/21/2015 12:37 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
That is because (at least up till Delphi XE) a Delphi service
application runs the *GUI* processmessages loop (it uses unit forms
for this).
Maybe from the POV of the application but...
With Win XP a Service could optionally show a GUI
On 09/21/2015 02:21 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I don't know what Lazarus's TTimer uses in the back-end
I do. But this is completely irrelevant regarding what is desirable to
offer to the users.
My ActiveNoGui draft does not use any GUI hook and it does work -
according to first simple
On 09/18/2015 06:08 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Quite cheeky, posting this on a Lazarus list :)
I never installed MSE IDE, as for porting to Linux an large Delphi
project with several Desktop applications and multiple Delphi-trained
Developers (I intended to trigger that for a long time)
On 09/20/2015 07:02 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have a DLL written in Delphi7 (or 2007), which implements a whole
bunch of basic functions ...
While if course in Linux a "dynamic link" concept like DLL does exist
and is widely used ("Shared Objects" ".so - files") why would you want
to use it
On 09/18/2015 03:44 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Now we need to shrink and ruggedize the system ...
IMHO a Pi is nit suitable to "ruggedize" a system. The Pi is made for
education purpose not for embedded use. It's stability, EDS immunity,
and temperature range is not suitable for this. If there
On 09/18/2015 04:08 PM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
3. Cross compile and cross debug the Linux application to RaspberryPi on the
Linux X86 PC.
I did try rather hard but getting cross compiling running with Lazarus
was not really amusing and I did not at all succeed in getting cross
(aka remote)
On 09/18/2015 07:00 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Linux X86 you could use MSEide and the FPC cross compiling environment from
here:
http://mseide-msegui.sourceforge.net/pics/crossarm.png
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcrossarm/
Maybe MSE is more suitable in this case,
On 09/18/2015 11:28 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The way your post was constructed, you made it sound as if lazarus
fails to offer what Delphi offers.
Sorry for being unclear !! (This obviously is just an issue of the word
"Console Application".)
The contrary is true. Lazarus (at least
On 09/18/2015 01:28 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have a need to port a Delphi console program written for Windows to
be used on Raspberry Pi2.
What are the steps needed to port to Pi2?
I would use a Linux desktop to do the port to Linux in the most
comfortable way, before considering the port
On 09/18/2015 10:42 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, Delphi itself does not offer an event
queue either in console programs.
In fact I doubt that the OP really intends to do a pure "console
program" that is called by e.g. bash and runs through without waiting
for
On 09/09/2015 09:54 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Have you tried the todolist package?
It seems to be called "todolistlaz"
It's not listed here:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Category:Lazarus_IDE_plugins
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 09/09/2015 09:54 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Have you tried the todolist package?
There is an IDE package "lazsvnpkg".
Great to find out that these packages already exist.
I'll do a search to find out what IDE packages might be useful...
Thanks,
-Michael
--
On 09/08/2015 05:53 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Lazarus 1.5 r48959 FPC 2.6.4 x86_64-linux-gtk 2. Does Lazarus
IDE have a window (something similar to TODO List window) that shows all
set bookmarks (source editor bookmarks).
Slightly related:
Eclipse supports TODO in a comment
On 09/09/2015 11:36 AM, Bart wrote:
Then please add it there.
I did not find a description in the wiki.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 08/31/2015 02:22 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
In addition to Larries suggestion
Sorry, of course I meant Michael vC's suggestions.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 08/30/2015 04:04 PM, Larry Dalton wrote:
I have a very large application with at least 20 forms. What would be the first
step in rewriting it as a web app?
In addition to Larries suggestion you (if necessary) should decide which
method to use to do "remote events", i.e. having your CGI
On 08/30/2015 10:21 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I have almost finishing writing a unit
...
GREAT !!
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 08/21/2015 11:37 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Windows 10 Mobile you can only run Apps (e.g. bought/got in the
Windows Store) meaning Universal Apps
What (technically) prevents running normal native programs on Windows
10 Mobile. (Of course Microsoft *prefers* arch independent CIL (aka C#
aka
On 08/20/2015 05:33 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
The old Windows Mobile was an OS geared towards PDAs/smartphones,
while the base system Windows CE is/was a general embedded OS.
I do know this.
But Microsoft keeps stating that !there is only one Windows 10 and
that same is here to replace all
On 08/20/2015 12:55 PM, Chavoux Luyt wrote:
Hi guys,
I need to know if I can use Lazarus for mibile development on Android,
Windows mobile and iOS (iPhone)?
I currently use a program (written in Delphi, I think) ...
The next generation of Windows Mobile seem to be Windows IOT Core
(or
On 08/03/2015 04:08 PM, Gour wrote:
Hello,
by looking at
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Add_Help_to_Your_Application page it
seems there are several options to provide help (aka user manual) for
one’s app - CHM, HTML INF.
As there is a wiki containing many pages that are interesting for
On 07/27/2015 07:47 AM, Péter Gábor wrote:
if Sender = TButton then { do something} ;
I suppose you meant
if Sender is TButton then { do something} ;
OP: If you want to deal with a lot of different classes that might be the
sender, it might help to define an array of these classes (types)
On 07/23/2015 07:01 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I don't like call home software either.
Is such not commonly called a virus ?
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 07/19/2015 06:32 PM, kapibara wrote:
How to do that under Lazarus and Linux?
Linux and Windows: TCriticalSection.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 07/20/2015 10:42 AM, kapibara wrote:
I'm afraid that if a TCriticalSection is used, all threads except one
is blocked.
No. Only those that try to acquire the CriticalSection while they are
owned by another thread.
Critical section is just a binary (non counting) Semaphore). I never had
a
On 06/30/2015 08:31 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
There are many javascript widgetsets out there that can be used as
VCL for the web: React, ExtJS, Angular, Jquery UI etc.
Any recommendation for one of those to create a server-based application
featuring a web-based remote GUI that is
On 06/25/2015 10:46 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Close. My Lazarus mirror doesn't have an 'activenogui' branch, so
doing a pull will not fetch anything.
I just did a test (after doing nothing than what you suggested in you
previous mail ).
git status said:
# On branch activenogui
git
On 06/25/2015 10:46 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
$ git branch --unset-upstream activenogui
Sorry:
git branch --unset-upstream activenogui
error: unknown option `unset-upstream'
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 06/25/2015 10:46 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
This is what you want. It is best to manually update your branch with
the latest Trunk changes, at a time that suites you best.
OK.
I expected that the updates of any file I did not change locally should
be performed, while remote updates to
On 06/25/2015 10:46 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
. When Github's instructions refer to 'origin', replace that with the
name 'github'.
I created a github (you were right I do have an account and there I
already do have an epictimer directory. So we seemingly already have
been there some time
In fact I do see the advantage.
Somebody else could do some test with the unit I did, but if we want to
include it in the IDE I suppose that hardly can done without the help of
GIT, as I can't home some of the IDE experts will do this. So we will
need to provide a fully functional and
On 06/26/2015 10:15 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Then start again, by logging into Github. Then deleting your lazarus
repository on Github (via their website). Then browse to my lazarus
repository on Github and click the fork button. Your account should
now have lazarus repository. Github
On 06/24/2015 06:03 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
git checkout -b activenogui origin/upstream
I got:
Branch activenogui set up to track remote branch upstream from
origin.
Switched to a new branch 'activenogui'
So this did work nicely.
Thanks again.
I suppose I now can just
On 06/25/2015 10:46 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2015-06-25 09:04, Michael Schnell wrote:
I suppose I now can just do git pull to receive any updates that the
Lazarus svn might provide ?
Close.
Ooops.
I need to try to digest all this information.
-Michael
On 06/24/2015 06:03 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2015-06-24 12:03, Michael Schnell wrote:
Then I could send you the code to do more testing and provide suggestions.
Why not simply fork the Lazarus repository on Github.
OK that is a much better alternative to transfer the source code
On 06/23/2015 04:36 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I don't use TCustomApplication anywhere in fpGUI or my applications.
I've also never had the need for QueueAsyncCall(), sorry. ;-)
My easy way to do (embedded) application for headless devices (hence
obviously NopGUI) is to do the application
On 06/24/2015 12:50 PM, Paul Breneman wrote:
As you know Michael I've been *very* interested for years with what
you are doing. I hope to get more going with FPC and Teensy in the
next few weeks:
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,28561.0.html
Then I hope to post more
On 06/23/2015 01:57 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I've done that in fpGUI because not everybody wants to use threads in
theire software. So now the developer has a choice.
Great !
IMHO a decent TApplication needs support as well for Timers as for
Threads, including Application.QueueAsyncCall.
On 06/23/2015 01:35 PM, patspiper wrote:
Pls don't hijack the thread with your never ending NoGui discussions.
Sorry.
But for somebody coming from Delphi it is likely confusing that a NoGUI
application needs to be done completely different than an Application
that does have a GUI, so I
On 06/23/2015 10:43 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
File-New Console Application
That creates a Console application - thus no dependenies on GUI toolkits.
And not support for things like TTimer, Application.QueuAsyncCall,
Support for TThread.Queue and TThread.Synchronize needs to be provided
by
On 06/23/2015 12:51 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Not to rehash an old topic... Maybe that is true for TTimer, but it
took me all of 10 minutes to implement a multi-threaded console
application and implementing a TThread based timer from scratch. All
working just fine under FreeBSD. So I really
On 06/23/2015 01:26 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Ehm. fpTimer contains just that, it exists since years.
This of course is a well known fact..
But if this is the recommended way to do timers, why does *any
*WidgetType (i.e. TApplication) offer TTimer ?
-Michael
--
On 06/18/2015 04:43 PM, Juha Manninen wrote:
Is it possible that your degenerating mind now confuses Build modes
with Additions and Overrides somehow?
You're welcome ;-)
Anyway Additions and Overrides now has a Set LCL Widget Type
dropdown box. To select the GUI system you want your project
On 06/22/2015 02:38 PM, Juha Manninen wrote:
Still I think you confused Build modes with Additions and
Overrides. They are very different things. A build mode contains all
compiler options, including the Additions and Overrides part.
Of course I do know this after I looked it up to prepare my
On 06/18/2015 06:01 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
In the pas file referencing the obj file I have this:
IMPLEMENTATION
USES
Windows;
{$L SPROMEPS.OBJ} { LINK WITH THE SUPERPRO OBJECT FILE }
{ External functions }
FUNCTION RNBOsproFormatPacket( ApiPacket : RB_SPRO_APIPACKET_PTR;
On 06/18/2015 06:48 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
However, this dongle component can equally well be used without being
dropped anywhere
Dropping is just a design time thingy. any visual component can be
used by doing the appropriate initialization code manually.
-Michael
--
On 06/19/2015 12:28 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Safenet might be able to provide a GNU C version
of that file.
Except I got a reply from them that they cannot support older software
in FPC
So I guess I have to go the Delphi DLL route instead...
That has nothing to do at all with FPC. FPC
On 06/19/2015 09:50 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Now I am getting to the real hurdle as follows:
DongleTest.lpr(20,1) Error: Illegal COFF Magic while reading
SPROMEPS.OBJ
Googeling coff magic shows e.g. this:
http://wiki.osdev.org/COFF
-Michael
--
On 06/18/2015 02:46 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I found similar functionality well hidden in Additions and Overrides.
I already often used this new kind of Build modes. Seemingly I am the
only one ;-) . (I am always focused on ARCH/OS/GUI-System portability.)
For my degenerating mind it's
On 06/16/2015 06:14 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Being open source and allowing me to customise things the way I like
is a brilliant feature.
He also wants to use closed source 3rd party stuff and want to impose
copy protection to his projects. All that is rather queer with an open
source IDE.
On 06/15/2015 08:21 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
If Lazarus does not work with this obj file then I would be dead in the
water...
Lazarus (including packages) and free pascal are cross-platform tools
supporting multiple Archs and CPUs. So an obj file can't be decently
supported as it will work
On 06/15/2015 08:21 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
- Asynch Pro
It would be just great to have this ported to be runnable in Windows,
Linux, and Mac as a Lazarus package !
(I would be happy to use it for my experiments, but as I don't have a
real project for this, I never tried to do the port
On 06/08/2015 10:57 AM, Andrea Mauri wrote:
I need code able to perform typical matrix operations (e.g. matrix
multiplication, inversion, determinant and so on) as fast as possible
since I deal with big matrices (thousands of rows and columns). I need
it for both windows and linux (32/64).
Just to let you know
In search of a problem completely unrelated to fpc and Lazarus I found
out that the reason of the severe timing inaccuracy making this
application being absolutely unusable for the desired task, has been
Microsoft Active Directory.
After I installed Automachron,
On 06/08/2015 02:28 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Thus the server should normally get its time from a NTP as well...
AFAIK, the AD Server does use NTP for syncing it's own time. The clients
fluctuate nonetheless.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 05/27/2015 08:48 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
yes... 12:00am is midnight... 00:00am is the same... so also is 00:00
or 24:00 in 24hour time...
AFAIK it's rather set that 24:00 is 00:00 the next day, but 12:00 am is
not 100% confident as Mark says.
-Michael
--
For me it works as expcted
var t: TDateTime;
i: integer;
s1, s2, s3, s4 : String;
begin
t := StrToDate('30-12-1899');
i := round (t);
s1 := DateTimeToStr(t);
s2 := IntToStr(i);
t := StrToDate('29-12-1899');
i := round (t);
s3 := DateTimeToStr(t);
s4 := IntToStr(i);
Memo1.Lines.Add (s1
On 05/27/2015 11:05 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
No it can't. You have to be prepared to parse 12:00 a.m. by context
but it's usually midnight.
Of which day the one that also has 0:pm or of the previous ?
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 05/27/2015 12:59 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Why should that be funny? TDateTime(0.0) is defined as 12/30/1899
12:00 am. Now add two days and we are at 1/1/1900 12:00 am, so all
is well...
To me (being born 12/31) it's funny that that the base is not a 1/1,
especially 1/1/0001. But of course
On 05/26/2015 01:30 PM, Juha Manninen wrote:
Is there some convention how to show a date value 0?
By default it shows year 1899. The patch changed it to ?.
Both funny, as DateTimeToStr(2.0) is 1-1-00 ;-)
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 05/26/2015 03:30 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
If it were something like Anno Domini 0, which quite simply never
existed, then it could be displayed as invalid.
It's funny, but AFAIK, you are right. By definition, before Year 1 there
was Year -1 and not Year 0.
Why TDateTime seemingly
On 05/22/2015 12:00 PM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
I would point to
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Android_Programming not tried,
There are also Apple and Windows Tablets.
As the goal of fpc and Lazarus is write once compile everywhere, and
(other than Delhi) as well fpc and the LCL does a
On 05/06/2015 10:37 AM, Giuliano Colla wrote:
I need to display some local html files in a Lazarus application,
which must run under Linux.
Maybe start a Browser with the file spec as parameter.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 04/22/2015 04:59 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:40:02 +0200
Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
But how to install most easily on Linux (I always use the svn) .
cd your/fpc/svn
make install INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr
I know this and to it often to make use
On 04/23/2015 10:11 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
fpc 1.2.6?
Sorry for that nonsense. As said in the first mail in this thread: FPC 2.6.4
Thanks for your patience ;-)
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 04/23/2015 11:34 AM, shoKwave wrote:
You can download stable versions form svn too (fpc 2.6.4:
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/release_2_6_4/).
Then build and install like the trunk but using a differnt directory.
Finaly switch the fpc in Lazarus.
Thanks a lot !
I will give
On 04/22/2015 02:07 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Why downgrade? You can install both and switch any time in the IDE.
Thanks !
But how to install most easily on Linux (I always use the svn) .
-Michael (sorry for my ignorance)
--
___
Lazarus mailing
On 04/22/2015 11:07 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
This release was built with FPC 2.6.4, same as the previous
release Lazarus 1.2.6.
I'd like to do some stuff that might be useful for the next release of
Lazarus, but this needs a certain (but unknown to me) minimum release of
the fpc
I once used Synapse to do a program that via HTTP logs in to web
interface of the controller of my central heating and check several
status values and modifies several configuration parameters.
Doing this was not exactly easy :-) .
-Michael
--
___
On 03/12/2015 06:39 PM, aradeonas wrote:
still my problem doesn't solve.
Do you really need multiple inheritance (this seems to be the cause why
you decided to go with Interfaces instead of pure classes) ?
This adds some complexity that in most cases can be avoided.
-Michael
--
On 03/13/2015 09:46 AM, aradeonas wrote:
Yes I need
In fact I doubt this.
(And don't do top-posing.This is very impolite.)
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 03/13/2015 10:49 AM, aradeonas wrote:
So in the end how can I cast a Interface to a Object in Lazarus?
You can't. An interface contains one or more object(s), so you can't
cast it to same.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 03/11/2015 08:57 AM, aradeonas wrote:
operator = (aLeft, aRight: TRec): Boolean;
Seemingly with operator =, operator is automatically overloaded.
Nonetheless it is possible to do your own (contradicting) operator
if you like :-) .
-Michael
--
On 03/11/2015 08:57 AM, aradeonas wrote:
operator = (aLeft, aRight: TRec): Boolean;
I get Logical Operator not supported.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 03/11/2015 10:02 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
I get Logical Operator not supported.
I do have:
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 03/11/2015 10:02 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
I get Logical Operator not supported.
I found that seemingly overloading an operator is not allowed within a
procedure, while defining a type is allowed.
Is this a bug or a feature ?
Anyway, the error message is a bit misleading
-Michael
On 03/11/2015 10:31 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Alternatively you can declare the operator inside TRec if you enable
modeswitch advancedrecords It means: {$modeswitch advancedrecords}
Nice ! (I tested this but forgot the mode switch ;) )
Why is this mode not the default ?
-Michael
--
201 - 300 of 1996 matches
Mail list logo
