On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:01:32 +0200
Sven Barth wrote:
>[...]
> Those and the code they link to would remain. It will depend on the
> specific initialization whether it can do any harm (especially with the
> widgetset not initialized) if left in...
The most harmful are probably:
- forms.pp install
Am 23.10.2015 14:20 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 10/23/2015 02:12 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>> He simple needs to get the unit to compile (which he did by adding the
LCL dependency) and stay clear from using any of the code that might use
GUI. In that case there will be no dependency on a spec
On 10/23/2015 02:12 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
He simple needs to get the unit to compile (which he did by adding the
LCL dependency) and stay clear from using any of the code that might
use GUI. In that case there will be no dependency on a specific GUI,
because the Interfaces unit is missing and t
On 10/23/2015 02:12 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
I somehow have the feeling that you and Graeme as well don't
understand what Bo's precise problem is. ...
... Yes, Bo should restructure his code, but he does not /need/ to do
so right now.
Bo's precise problem is that he does not want to restruc
On 10/22/2015 06:32 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
That still doesn't explain why the original Delphi code required a
TListView instance. TListView is purely a GUI component - so I'm very
puzzled.
I had been at this point already years ago. As you might know, I myself
do not have any Pascal "use
On 10/21/2015 05:14 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
So too is the LCL-NoGUI hack.
That is why I am doing the "Active NoGUI" LCL Widget Type that is
supposed to be a real application
Then refactor / clean-up the code to remove such "gui" dependencies
As I pointed out in the beginning of the dis
