I had a go buidling Lazarus with this short script
set oldpath=%PATH%
>
> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
>
> make clean all PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
>
> make install INSTALL_PREFIX=M:\LazarusExes\binaries\0931_30714
> PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.e
Try this:
set oldpath=%PATH%
PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
make clean
make pkgide PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
make install INSTALL_PREFIX=M:\LazarusExes\binaries\0931_30714
PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
PATH=%oldpath%
Although the make install is
On 16 July 2011 17:05, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Try this:
>
> set oldpath=%PATH%
> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
> make clean
> make pkgide PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
> make install INSTALL_PREFIX=M:\LazarusExes\binaries\
2011/7/16 Frank Church :
> What command do use for installing it to your chosen location?
None. For me it is already in the place that I want it ... where the
source code is.
I just make a shortcut to call it with a local primary config file and
then I set the path to the compiler in the environm
2011/7/16 Frank Church
>
> I had a go buidling Lazarus with this short script
>>
>> set oldpath=%PATH%
>>
>> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
>>
>> make clean all PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
>>
>> make install INSTALL_PREFIX=M:\LazarusExes\binaries\0931_30714
>> PP=M:\Fre
On 16 July 2011 23:22, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> 2011/7/16 Frank Church
> >
> > I had a go buidling Lazarus with this short script
> >>
> >> set oldpath=%PATH%
> >>
> >> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
> >>
> >> make clean all PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
> >>
> >> make ins
You must be doing something wrong then.
* Assuming fpc binaries and binutils are in %path%
* After updating the sources from svn:
cd \path_to_lazarus_sources
make clean all OPT='-gl'
that should be all.
(Then in Lazarus IDE set compiler to the same one you used to build
Lazarus, or things go wro
On 17 July 2011 15:57, Bart wrote:
> You must be doing something wrong then.
>
> * Assuming fpc binaries and binutils are in %path%
> * After updating the sources from svn:
>
> cd \path_to_lazarus_sources
> make clean all OPT='-gl'
>
> that should be all.
> (Then in Lazarus IDE set compiler to th
Lazarus' makefile is different from FPC, it expects LAZARUS_INSTALL_DIR
instead of INSTALL_PREFIX for installation location
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Building-Lazarus-for-Windows-tp3174724p3176979.html
Sent from the Free P
On 7/17/11, Frank Church wrote:
> What of the installation phase, when you have to copy the Lazarus build to
> the location of your choice, which is not c:\lazarus?
Well I have a simple setup:
I do not use snapshots for Lazarus.
I only have the sources.
I installed Fpc (currently 2.4.4) from bin
2011/7/17 Frank Church :
>
> What of the installation phase, when you have to copy the Lazarus build to
> the location of your choice, which is not c:\lazarus?
These scripts won't "install" FPC/Lazarus, but they both work fine after.
You can change the path to something do you want... of course!
I
y every time (not sure about this though ;) ).
--
> View this message in context:
> http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Building-Lazarus-for-Windows-tp3174724p3176979.html
> Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing
pilation. So back to the drawing board on that.
>
> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Building-Lazarus-for-Windows-tp3174724p3176979.html
>> Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
>
> I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
> installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
> set of files. There were only 48 files the compared with the 70 or so in the
> others, and make was one of the missin
Marcos Douglas wrote:
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
set of files. There were only 48 files the compared with the 70 or so in the
others, and make was on
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>
> Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/18 Frank Church :
>>>
>>> I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
>>> installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
>>> set of files. The
Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Marcos Douglas wrote:
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
set of files. Th
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>
> No doubt. But Windows is not one of my major platforms, and the build from
> 2.4.4 (as distinct from fixes_2_4) appears to be incomplete when compared
> with the build from 2.4.2.
I don't know explain that.
BTW, the fixes_2_4 has the
18 matches
Mail list logo
