On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>
> No doubt. But Windows is not one of my major platforms, and the build from
> 2.4.4 (as distinct from fixes_2_4) appears to be incomplete when compared
> with the build from 2.4.2.
I don't know explain that.
BTW, the fixes_2_4 has the
Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Marcos Douglas wrote:
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
set of files. Th
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>
> Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/18 Frank Church :
>>>
>>> I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
>>> installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
>>> set of files. The
Marcos Douglas wrote:
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
set of files. There were only 48 files the compared with the 70 or so in the
others, and make was on
2011/7/18 Frank Church :
>
> I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
> installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
> set of files. There were only 48 files the compared with the 70 or so in the
> others, and make was one of the missin
pilation. So back to the drawing board on that.
>
> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Building-Lazarus-for-Windows-tp3174724p3176979.html
>> Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.
y every time (not sure about this though ;) ).
--
> View this message in context:
> http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Building-Lazarus-for-Windows-tp3174724p3176979.html
> Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing
2011/7/17 Frank Church :
>
> What of the installation phase, when you have to copy the Lazarus build to
> the location of your choice, which is not c:\lazarus?
These scripts won't "install" FPC/Lazarus, but they both work fine after.
You can change the path to something do you want... of course!
I
On 7/17/11, Frank Church wrote:
> What of the installation phase, when you have to copy the Lazarus build to
> the location of your choice, which is not c:\lazarus?
Well I have a simple setup:
I do not use snapshots for Lazarus.
I only have the sources.
I installed Fpc (currently 2.4.4) from bin
Lazarus' makefile is different from FPC, it expects LAZARUS_INSTALL_DIR
instead of INSTALL_PREFIX for installation location
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Building-Lazarus-for-Windows-tp3174724p3176979.html
Sent from the Free P
On 17 July 2011 15:57, Bart wrote:
> You must be doing something wrong then.
>
> * Assuming fpc binaries and binutils are in %path%
> * After updating the sources from svn:
>
> cd \path_to_lazarus_sources
> make clean all OPT='-gl'
>
> that should be all.
> (Then in Lazarus IDE set compiler to th
You must be doing something wrong then.
* Assuming fpc binaries and binutils are in %path%
* After updating the sources from svn:
cd \path_to_lazarus_sources
make clean all OPT='-gl'
that should be all.
(Then in Lazarus IDE set compiler to the same one you used to build
Lazarus, or things go wro
On 16 July 2011 23:22, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> 2011/7/16 Frank Church
> >
> > I had a go buidling Lazarus with this short script
> >>
> >> set oldpath=%PATH%
> >>
> >> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
> >>
> >> make clean all PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
> >>
> >> make ins
2011/7/16 Frank Church
>
> I had a go buidling Lazarus with this short script
>>
>> set oldpath=%PATH%
>>
>> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
>>
>> make clean all PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
>>
>> make install INSTALL_PREFIX=M:\LazarusExes\binaries\0931_30714
>> PP=M:\Fre
2011/7/16 Frank Church :
> What command do use for installing it to your chosen location?
None. For me it is already in the place that I want it ... where the
source code is.
I just make a shortcut to call it with a local primary config file and
then I set the path to the compiler in the environm
On 16 July 2011 17:05, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Try this:
>
> set oldpath=%PATH%
> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
> make clean
> make pkgide PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
> make install INSTALL_PREFIX=M:\LazarusExes\binaries\
Try this:
set oldpath=%PATH%
PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
make clean
make pkgide PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
make install INSTALL_PREFIX=M:\LazarusExes\binaries\0931_30714
PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
PATH=%oldpath%
Although the make install is
I had a go buidling Lazarus with this short script
set oldpath=%PATH%
>
> PATH=M:\Lazarus\Binutils;%PATH%
>
> make clean all PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.exe
>
> make install INSTALL_PREFIX=M:\LazarusExes\binaries\0931_30714
> PP=M:\FreePascal\251_17989\bin\i386-win32\ppc386.e
18 matches
Mail list logo
