Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-02-05 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:35:04 +0100 Marco van de Voort wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:40:16PM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe the "gmake clean" does not work under FreeBSD? > > > > > > Are there any custom rules regarding this file, or SED use? > > > > > > Makefile ope

Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-02-05 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:40:16PM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > > > > Maybe the "gmake clean" does not work under FreeBSD? > > > > Are there any custom rules regarding this file, or SED use? > > > > Makefile operation under FreeBSD is older than fpcmake generated makefiles. > > [clean]

Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-02-04 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2013-02-03 22:22, Mattias Gaertner wrote: >>> ./components/lazutils/fileutil.pas >>> ./docs/xml/lazutils/fileutil.xml >>> ./lcl/units/x86_64-freebsd/fileutil.ppu >>> ./lcl/units/x86_64-freebsd/fileutil.o > > Where is this fileutil.ppu coming from? > > Maybe the "gmake clean" does not work unde

Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-02-03 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:28:45 +0100 Marco van de Voort wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:22:10PM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > > $ find . -name fileutil.* -print > > > > ./components/lazutils/fileutil.inc > > > > ./components/lazutils/lib/x86_64-freebsd/fileutil.ppu > > > > ./components/la

Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-02-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:22:10PM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > $ find . -name fileutil.* -print > > > ./components/lazutils/fileutil.inc > > > ./components/lazutils/lib/x86_64-freebsd/fileutil.ppu > > > ./components/lazutils/lib/x86_64-freebsd/fileutil.o > > This is ok. > > > > ./compone

Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-02-03 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:33:27 + Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > [...] > On 01/31/13 17:25, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > > > $ gmake bigide > > ...snip... > > Compiling ctunitgroupgraph.pas > > Assembling ctunitgroupgraph > > Assembling codetools > > 117099 lines compiled, 5.6 sec > > /bin/cp -f Ma

Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-02-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:39:00AM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > 'bigide' option, or one of the packages that 'bigide' pulls in has a > > compile problem under FreeBSD. > > Please create a bug report with the complete output of the "make clean > bigide" output. And the dates of both fileuti

Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-01-31 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:33:27 + Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > OK, it seems that there is a problem with the 'gmake bigide' option. I > always used to use 'make bigide' under Linux, so wanted to use the same > options under FreeBSD. > > Atfer that failure, I thought what the hell, let try a fe

Re: [Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-01-31 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
OK, it seems that there is a problem with the 'gmake bigide' option. I always used to use 'make bigide' under Linux, so wanted to use the same options under FreeBSD. Atfer that failure, I thought what the hell, let try a few others. I then tried 'gmake clean all' for the minimal IDE, and that wor

[Lazarus] Compiling IDE issues using FreeBSD 9.1 & FPC 2.6.0

2013-01-31 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi, Lazarus IDE fails to compile under FreeBSD 9.1 (64-bit) using FPC 2.6.0. First of all, the Readme.txt file is wrong. It says to use 'make clean all', well apparently not so under FreeBSD. After peeking at the Makefile in the /usr/ports/editors/lazarus/ directory, I guessed I should use 'gmake