Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Lubos Pintes
Ahh git log. :-D I am stupid really, I am using it often. Dňa 19. 4. 2013 17:28 Juha Manninen wrote / napísal(a): On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes wrote: Unfortunately the gitk doesn't work at all with screen reader, even display hooks are not working so I "see" absolutely nothing. How can I retrieve

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Juha Manninen
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes wrote: > Unfortunately the gitk doesn't work at all with screen reader, even > display hooks are not working so I "see" absolutely nothing. > How can I retrieve this information through the console? "git log" with its many parameters. I must say you have a challenging si

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Lubos Pintes
I believe this is already solved, as Mattias said, something not needed was generated by code completion. Dňa 19. 4. 2013 14:58 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote / napísal(a): On 2013-04-19 13:03, Juha Manninen wrote: What is the last revision you see at upstream head? I can also confirm that the githu

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Lubos Pintes
Unfortunately the gitk doesn't work at all with screen reader, even display hooks are not working so I "see" absolutely nothing. How can I retrieve this information through the console? I am fairly new to git... Dňa 19. 4. 2013 14:03 Juha Manninen wrote / napísal(a): On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes wr

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2013-04-19 13:03, Juha Manninen wrote: > > What is the last revision you see at upstream head? I can also confirm that the github mirror (both FPC and Lazarus) are in sync... FPC last commit 5 hours ago, Lazarus last commit 15 minutes ago. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:59:15 +0200 Lubos Pintes wrote: > So this means that something was added that is really not needed by code > completion? Yes. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepa

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Juha Manninen
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes wrote: > Yes I did. And git complained that branch upstream already exists. > Then I did > git checkout -b win32Accessibility upstream Try this: $ git checkout upstream $ git pull $ gitk --all & What is the last revision you see at upstream head? Juha -- ___

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Lubos Pintes
So this means that something was added that is really not needed by code completion? Dňa 19. 4. 2013 12:55 Mattias Gaertner wrote / napísal(a): Lubos Pintes hat am 19. April 2013 um 12:43 geschrieben: Och sorry. My branch is broken. I cannot figure out how that happened, I believe Lazarus mes

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Lubos Pintes
Yes I did. And git complained that branch upstream already exists. Then I did git checkout -b win32Accessibility upstream And started to make changes. Did several "git rebase upstream". I am sure I didn't touch things like anchors etc. Dňa 19. 4. 2013 13:40 Juha Manninen wrote / napísal(a): On 4/

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Juha Manninen
On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes wrote: > Och sorry. My branch is broken. Did you do this step for sure : $ git checkout -b upstream origin/upstream Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mai

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
> Lubos Pintes hat am 19. April 2013 um 12:43 geschrieben: > > > Och sorry. My branch is broken. I cannot figure out how that happened, I > believe Lazarus messed up control.inc for some reason. Or I did > something stupid. > Usage of Lazarus is still bad with NVDA... > Really I would like to kno

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Lubos Pintes
Och sorry. My branch is broken. I cannot figure out how that happened, I believe Lazarus messed up control.inc for some reason. Or I did something stupid. Usage of Lazarus is still bad with NVDA... Really I would like to know what exactly happened. I am playing with accessibility so I modified

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Lubos Pintes
I have git repo from github.com/graemeg. So perhaps it is broken... Dňa 19. 4. 2013 11:18 Juha Manninen wrote / napísal(a): I only found: function TControl.GetAnchorSide(Kind: TAnchorKind): TAnchorSide; and it is not empty. What Lazarus version? Juha On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes wrote: Hi, This

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
> Lubos Pintes hat am 19. April 2013 um 11:01 geschrieben: > > > Hi, > This function seems to be empty (hint issued) > function TControl.GetAnchorSide(AIndex: Integer): TAnchorSide; Lazarus svn 40851 has: function TControl.GetAnchorSide(Kind: TAnchorKind): TAnchorSide; begin Result:=FAnchorSi

Re: [Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Juha Manninen
I only found: function TControl.GetAnchorSide(Kind: TAnchorKind): TAnchorSide; and it is not empty. What Lazarus version? Juha On 4/19/13, Lubos Pintes wrote: > Hi, > This function seems to be empty (hint issued) > function TControl.GetAnchorSide(AIndex: Integer): TAnchorSide; > > > -- > _

[Lazarus] Empty function?

2013-04-19 Thread Lubos Pintes
Hi, This function seems to be empty (hint issued) function TControl.GetAnchorSide(AIndex: Integer): TAnchorSide; -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus