On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:10:11 +0200
Juha Manninen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Mattias Gaertner
> wrote:
> > Maybe we can add some mechanism to let packages define some priorities
> > for their components.
>
> The registration order is now the mechanism, isn't it?
Yes.
But maybe a p
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> Maybe we can add some mechanism to let packages define some priorities
> for their components.
The registration order is now the mechanism, isn't it?
The GUI will be important for users' custom changes.
Juha
--
_
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 02:55:10 +1100
Alexander Klenin wrote:
> As far as I understand, conponents are now listed in the order of
> registration,
> which depends on the (alphabetical?) order of packages.
Packages are sorted only topologically and by dependency lists, not
alphabetically.
Components
On Monday 04 of February 2013 16:55:10 Alexander Klenin wrote:
> As far as I understand, conponents are now listed in the order of
> registration, which depends on the (alphabetical?) order of packages.
>
> Is there any way to control that?
> Specifically, I'd like "TGUIConnectorBGRA" component, w
As far as I understand, conponents are now listed in the order of registration,
which depends on the (alphabetical?) order of packages.
Is there any way to control that?
Specifically, I'd like "TGUIConnectorBGRA" component, which is
currently placed first
on the "Chart" page, to be placed last (or
