Is this statement 'Lazarus and Free Pascal aim to be write once,
compile anywhere' still a goal? If so can someone please provide me
with the source code of a non trivial program which runs on Windows,
Linux and OS X (Intel) using the current stable software available at
http://sourceforge.
here's list of the such programs:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Projects
and here's another one for all 3 OSe:
.http://sourceforge.net/projects/devwork (please compile from
sources).
thanks,
dmitry
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists
2009/11/11 Brian Prentice :
> Is this statement 'Lazarus and Free Pascal aim to be write once, compile
> anywhere' still a goal? If so can someone please provide me with the source
> code of a non trivial program which runs on Windows, Linux and OS X (Intel)
> using the current stable software avai
Brian Prentice wrote:
> Is this statement 'Lazarus and Free Pascal aim to be write once,
> compile anywhere' still a goal? If so can someone please provide me
> with the source code of a non trivial program which runs on Windows,
> Linux and OS X (Intel) using the current stable software avai
Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> One of the them is Lazarus, download the source from
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/ :-)
Great minds think alike. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
--
_
Which source file, the only one seems to be a linux rpm file which I
can't use on my Mac.
Brian
On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2009/11/11 Brian Prentice :
Is this statement 'Lazarus and Free Pascal aim to be write once,
compile
anywhere' still a goal? If so can someo
Brian Prentice schreef:
Which source file, the only one seems to be a linux rpm file which I
can't use on my Mac.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/Lazarus Zip _ GZip/Lazarus
0.9.28.2/
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.
Is this statement 'Lazarus and Free Pascal aim to be write once,
compile anywhere' still a goal? If so can someone please provide me
with the source code of a non trivial program which runs on Windows,
Linux and OS X (Intel) using the current stable software available at
You must be a newco
On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
I don't believe that Lazarus is an example. Here is a program that
Compiles and runs under Windows XP and compiles but does not run under
OS X on an Intel Mac.
http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/LazarusSquareCell.zip
I suspect that
id
you test with 0.9.28.2 on Mac?
Thanks.
-Phil
From: Brian Prentice [bprent...@webenet.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:12 PM
To: Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Goal
On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
I don't believe that Lazarus i
Brian Prentice wrote:
On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
I don't believe that Lazarus is an example.
Ah, Why not? (Well you do not need to believe it, or you don't need a
reason for disbelief). But why is Lazarus not an example? Which part of
your question does it not fulfi
On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Hess, Philip J wrote:
Looks cool, although I don't know what it's doing.
I'll take a look at it tonight on my Macs. Since you're [thankfully]
not using the Win API anywhere, this app really should work. If not,
then that likely means something not right in the
I've managed to compile the program and launch it on OSX, so i guess
"Write once, compile anywhere" works.
Too bad that OSes are too different, so some cross-platform style
should be followed while writing the code.
thanks,
dmitry
--
___
Lazarus mailin
Hi!
> I wrote the Lazarus version of SquareCell sometime ago. It is a
> stripped down version of this Delphi program:
>
> http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/SquareCell/Version%201/Square%20Cell.html
>
> I did test the program with version 0.9.28.2 on my Mac. It seems that
> the mouse events and st
ednesday, November 11, 2009 3:00 PM
To: Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Goal
I've managed to compile the program and launch it on OSX, so i guess
"Write once, compile anywhere" works.
Too bad that OSes are too different, so some cross-platform style
should b
I did test the program with version 0.9.28.2 on my Mac. It seems
that the mouse events and status bar don't work correctly. Since
the menus on Widows XP and OS X behave differently, the program
needs to be rewritten to use buttons rather than menus to control
the simulation and use menu
2009/11/12 Bee Jay :
>> I did test the program with version 0.9.28.2 on my Mac. It seems that the
>> mouse events and status bar don't work correctly. Since the menus on
>> Widows XP and OS X behave differently, the program needs to be rewritten to
>> use buttons rather than menus to control th
2009/11/11 Brian Prentice :
> I'll take a look at it tonight on my Macs. Since you're [thankfully] not
> using the Win API anywhere, this app really should work. If not, then that
> likely means something not right in the underlying Carbon-based widgetset
> used on OS X. Note that it's still consid
Brian, i've took the liberty to make the sources friendlier to Carbon.
Here's the fixed version:
http://havefunsoft.com/fpc/LazarusSquareCell_macfixed.zip
You can simply place squares around the field and run them with "Step"
or "Start" menu.
I've added additional "Invalidate" calls in TDisplay
2009/11/12 Brian Prentice :
> http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/WindowsXP.jpg
http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/WindowXP.jpg
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/
2009/11/12 Brian Prentice :
> There is one issue which is pertinent to this topic though.
> http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/OSX.jpg
> and
> http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/WindowsXP.jpg
> show the Selection Control Dialog displayed on each operating system. I
> would be interested in
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:48:47 +0300
dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
> 2009/11/12 Brian Prentice :
> > There is one issue which is pertinent to this topic though.
> > http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/OSX.jpg
> > and
> > http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/WindowsXP.jpg
> > show the Selection Con
dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
2009/11/12 Brian Prentice :
There is one issue which is pertinent to this topic though.
http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/OSX.jpg
and
http://linuxenvy.com/bprentice/Lazarus/WindowsXP.jpg
show the Selection Control Dialog displayed on each operating system. I
wo
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> The designer uses ExcludeClipRect to clip child controls.
> Maybe there is a bug in the carbon interface?
It can be. Needs testing.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal
My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable
and one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require
the construction of two dialogs one for OS X and one for WindowsXP.
Perhaps I'm wrong here but if I'm right this violates the Lazarus and
FPC goal of
Brian Prentice schreef:
My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable
and one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require
the construction of two dialogs one for OS X and one for WindowsXP.
Perhaps I'm wrong here but if I'm right this violates the Laza
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> The designer uses ExcludeClipRect to clip child controls.
> Maybe there is a bug in the carbon interface?
Fixed in r22551
thanks,
dmitry
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.free
2009/11/12 Brian Prentice :
> My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable and
> one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require the
> construction of two dialogs one for OS X and one for WindowsXP. Perhaps I'm
> wrong here but if I'm right this violates
Brian,
Is there some reason why you haven't set the font in that dialog? Try Arial10.
Thanks.
-Phil
From: Brian Prentice [bprent...@webenet.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:48 PM
To: Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Goa
Brian Prentice wrote:
My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable
and one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require
the construction of two dialogs one for OS X and one for WindowsXP.
Perhaps I'm wrong here but if I'm right this violates the Lazaru
This indeed violates that "goal", but please don't evaluate lazarus as
a complete product. There is a bug tracker, with very friendly and
responsive developers, as you have noticed.
That's why I said he's not ready to join an open source project
_driven_ by community. I never mean to discoura
m: Brian Prentice [bprent...@webenet.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:48 PM
To: Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Goal
My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable
and one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require
the construction of two
Brian Prentice wrote:
> probably know Java has solved this problem nicely with layout
> managers. If layout managers were implemented in Lazarus the IDE
I fully agree, layout managers (or even only one layout manager) would
solve this problem. LCL has Anchors (a lot more advanced compared to sa
Brian Prentice schrieb:
> My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable
> and one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require
> the construction of two dialogs one for OS X and one for WindowsXP.
> Perhaps I'm wrong here but if I'm right this violates the
34 matches
Mail list logo
