Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-13 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Hello, I just received my copy of Linux Journal: Issue 185 with the 5-page Lazarus article by Mattias Gaertner. After many years, finally Lazarus in Linux Journal, I thought I'd never see the day :-) Good job, Mattias ! I just got a notice from Linux Journal tha

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-12 Thread David W Noon
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:43:02 +0200, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi wrote about Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article: [snip] > If its possible and legal, somebody can scan it to share with the rest > of us? Try the following URI: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/10502 -- Regards, Dave [RLU #

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Hans-Peter Diettrich
Giuseppe Luigi Punzi schrieb: I just received my copy of Linux Journal: Issue 185 with the 5-page Lazarus article by Mattias Gaertner. After many years, finally Lazarus in Linux Journal, I thought I'd never see the day :-) Good job, Mattias ! Oops, my last mail was suppose to be a answer t

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:09:41 -0500 Andrew Brunner wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Mattias > Gaertner wrote: > > > > All bugs in the 0.9.28 section stops the release of 0.9.28. They are > > all stop-release bugs. > > I am going to say this for the benefit of all when I say that this > sho

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Andrew Brunner
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > All bugs in the 0.9.28 section stops the release of 0.9.28. They are > all stop-release bugs. I am going to say this for the benefit of all when I say that this should not be the case. Taking months if not years between releases makes th

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread David W Noon
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:43:02 +0200, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi wrote about Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article: [snip] > If its possible and legal, somebody can scan it to share with the rest > of us? Linux Journal usually makes its articles available from its Web site a couple of weeks aft

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:14:06 -0500 Andrew Brunner wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Vincent > Snijders wrote: > > I fear I cannot follow you. Since two months or so, we want to make > > a release. We have identified critical bugs and regressions that we > > want to resolve before the releas

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Flávio Etrusco
A somewhat related but completely uninformed suggestion: what about making the next release 0.10.0? -Flávio -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Andrew Brunner
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote: > I fear I cannot follow you. Since two months or so, we want to make a > release. We have identified critical bugs and regressions that we want to > resolve before the release and marked them with the 0.9.28 target. Do you > say we should sta

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Giuseppe Luigi Punzi
El jue, 06-08-2009 a las 13:26 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt escribió: > Hello, > > I just received my copy of Linux Journal: > Issue 185 with the 5-page Lazarus article by Mattias Gaertner. > > After many years, finally Lazarus in Linux Journal, > I thought I'd never see the day :-) > > Good job

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Vincent Snijders
Andrew Brunner schreef: On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote: I'd rather not release a product that destroys files, even it looks great: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14167 and maybe: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13931 True. Nobody wants their code deleted

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Andrew Brunner
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote: > > I'd rather not release a product that destroys files, even it looks great: > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14167 > and maybe: > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13931 True. Nobody wants their code deleted. But with good Q

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Vincent Snijders
Andrew Brunner schreef: I know how to get the latest and greatest. What I'm trying to convey is that Ubuntu and other Linux offerings are bringing people under their wing away from Windows. Packages, RPMs, Repositories, SubVersion, Apt-get Install, All unknown and scary to an new age linux use

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Andrew Brunner
I know how to get the latest and greatest. What I'm trying to convey is that Ubuntu and other Linux offerings are bringing people under their wing away from Windows. Packages, RPMs, Repositories, SubVersion, Apt-get Install, All unknown and scary to an new age linux user. We need to have a good

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Vincent Snijders
Andrew Brunner schreef: Sweet.How much effort does an "Automated" build process take to developer so on a whim, with a good codebase a Lazarus team member could generate an interim Release like say 9.27 :-) Click on "Daily snapshots" and end up here: http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Andrew Brunner
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote: > Andrew Brunner schreef: >> >> hold off on issues until after a major version >> increase... > > What do you mean by that? Hi Vincent, I mean that having the 9.26 release on the website when 9.27 from SVN is so much better by any standards,

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Vincent Snijders
Andrew Brunner schreef: hold off on issues until after a major version increase... What do you mean by that? Anyway, we (at least I) started working on a new release almost 4 months ago: http://lazarus-dev.blogspot.com/2009/04/no-updates-on-0926-fixes-branch.html Vincent -- ___

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Andrew Brunner
You Serious !?! They didn't send you a complimentary copy. I think now would be a great time to release 9.27 to really keep anyone testing it out. I we don't place 9.27 up front now I feel it will be a wasted opportunity. IMO this is big news. Please get the best build out on the website. If I

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:26:16 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Hello, I just received my copy of Linux Journal: Issue 185 with the 5-page Lazarus article by Mattias Gaertner. After many years, finally Lazarus in Linux Journal, I thought I'd

Re: [Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:26:16 +0200 (CEST) Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > Hello, > > I just received my copy of Linux Journal: > Issue 185 with the 5-page Lazarus article by Mattias Gaertner. > > After many years, finally Lazarus in Linux Journal, > I thought I'd never see the day :-) > > Good jo

[Lazarus] Linux Journal article

2009-08-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
Hello, I just received my copy of Linux Journal: Issue 185 with the 5-page Lazarus article by Mattias Gaertner. After many years, finally Lazarus in Linux Journal, I thought I'd never see the day :-) Good job, Mattias ! Michael. -- ___ Lazarus mai