Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
On 2013-04-24 16:54, leledumbo wrote:
The prerequisites
suck, REALLY REALLY SUCK (why do the hell they need .NET framework there?)
Because they had the brain fart to write the Delphi IDE in .NET, thus
giving it the special features of being super slow, incredibly
Le 25/04/2013 08:25, Hans-Peter
Diettrich a crit:
IMO we (FPC/Lazarus) should be prepared for providing a new home
for desparate Delphi coders, which will trash RadStudio for too
little and too slow progress, and lack of compatibility, at a
Am 25.04.2013 09:54, schrieb Antonio Fortuny:
Maybe one thing could make happier than now: is it out there any plans
to have Lazarus to manage project groups ? It is the only problem
which bothers me.
I requested that already around two years ago:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18518
On 04/24/2013 09:44 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Because AFAIK they implemented various features in the IDE through the
.NET framework. And yes, I don't like that idea either ;)
Regarding the recent (seemingly non existing) discussions on CIL (which
mostly is miss-named .NET, as the CIL virtual
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com hat am 25. April 2013 um 10:10
geschrieben:
Am 25.04.2013 09:54, schrieb Antonio Fortuny:
Maybe one thing could make happier than now: is it out there any
plans to have Lazarus to manage project groups ? It is the only
On 2013-04-25 07:25, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Well, slow and memory hungry may be, but portability is achieved to
every .NET enabled platform.
WinForms is not 100% portable via Mono (last I checked). I wouldn't go
that route either because Microsoft will be on your case when it suits
them -
On 04/24/2013 11:09 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Because they had the brain fart to write the Delphi IDE in .NET, thus
giving it the special features of being super slow, incredibly memory
hungry and not portable to other platforms.
In fact .NET code is rather portable (using Mono)
Of course
On 04/25/2013 08:25 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
IMO we (FPC/Lazarus) should be prepared for providing a new home for
desparate Delphi coders, ...
I think the current state in fact would offer a nice home for them, if
there would not be the Unicode mess, that only will not take them aback
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
On 2013-04-25 07:25, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Well, slow and memory hungry may be, but portability is achieved to
every .NET enabled platform.
WinForms is not 100% portable via Mono (last I checked). I wouldn't go
that route either because Microsoft will be on
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 04/24/2013 11:09 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Because they had the brain fart to write the Delphi IDE in .NET, thus
giving it the special features of being super slow, incredibly memory
hungry and not portable to other platforms.
In fact .NET
On 04/25/2013 02:04 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
With Miguel de icaza choosing for Apple, Mono will die slowly anyway :)
It can't happen soon enough as far as I'm concerned, I've never
forgiven OpenSuSE their use of mono. :)
If CIL would have been as successful as one might have assumed
On 04/25/2013 03:39 PM, Alexsander Rosa wrote:
Is Mono alive yet?
Looks like:
http://news.mono-project.com/
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Seemingly no support for Linux, Android.
- http://www.embarcadero.com/products/rad-studio
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
- different compilers for the supported targets - the new ARC is only
available for ARM iOS. How can they sell this ... as a cross-platform
solution ?
- do we have September again ? Now they are going to sell you beta
software in a half year cycle (instead of yearly as they used to do in
the
On 24 April 2013 09:52, Adrian Veith adr...@veith-system.de wrote:
- different compilers for the supported targets - the new ARC is only
available for ARM iOS. How can they sell this ... as a cross-platform
solution ?
- do we have September again ? Now they are going to sell you beta
vfclists . schrieb:
Why don't they give make it a 120 or 180 day evaluation with bug fixes
included? It takes time to evaluate a product as well as develop a good
product in it, something you may be doing in your spare time. If after
using that long it turns out to be good enough the
://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/XE4/en/Installation_Notes_for_XE4
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-RAD-Studio-XE4-Released-tp4030944p4030986.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 24.04.2013 17:54, leledumbo wrote:
How can they sell this ... as a cross-platform solution ?
For most people, having at least two different targets already counts
cross-platform, even if the host is only one (yaoming). The prerequisites
suck, REALLY REALLY SUCK (why do the hell they need
On 2013-04-24 16:54, leledumbo wrote:
The prerequisites
suck, REALLY REALLY SUCK (why do the hell they need .NET framework there?)
Because they had the brain fart to write the Delphi IDE in .NET, thus
giving it the special features of being super slow, incredibly memory
hungry and not portable
On 2013-04-24 16:54, leledumbo wrote:
The prerequisites
suck, REALLY REALLY SUCK (why do the hell they need .NET framework there?)
I also forgot to mention the biggest laughing stock of them all... A
full install with help just takes 45-60 minutes. WTF! Yeah, I heard them
say that on todays
http://www.h-online.com/developer/news/item/RAD-Studio-XE4-focuses-on-cross-platform-apps-1848176.html
http://www.embarcadero.com/press-releases/embarcadero-technologies-unveils-multi-device-true-native-app-development-suite
--
Frank Church
===
Yes, it is released as planned on April 22.
With best regards,
Boian Mitov
---
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
---
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 21086 of
22 matches
Mail list logo
