Re: [Lazarus] RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : Lazarus on Solaris 10

2011-07-29 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Ludo Brands wrote: TApplication.HandleException Illegal character in format string Stack trace: $000736FC STOREFORMAT, line 978 of /export/home/local-src/fpc/fpcbuild-2.4.4/fpcsrc/rtl/objpas/sy sutils/dati.inc $00072E20 FORMATDATETIME, line 796 of /export/home/local-src/fpc/fpcbui

[Lazarus] RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : Lazarus on Solaris 10

2011-07-29 Thread Ludo Brands
> TApplication.HandleException Illegal character in format string >Stack trace: >$000736FC STOREFORMAT, line 978 of > /export/home/local-src/fpc/fpcbuild-2.4.4/fpcsrc/rtl/objpas/sy > sutils/dati.inc >$00072E20 FORMATDATETIME, line 796 of > /export/home/local-src/fpc/fpcbuild-2.4

Re: [Lazarus] RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : Lazarus on Solaris 10

2011-07-28 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Marco van de Voort wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:33:47PM +0200, Ludo Brands wrote: Ludo, in your instructions for Intel you've got an FPC= shell variable: should that be PPC=? FPC= is a synonym of PP=, no? No. PP= the compiler. "ppc*.exe" with *=target architecture FPC= the frontloade

Re: [Lazarus] RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : Lazarus on Solaris 10

2011-07-28 Thread Marco van de Voort
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:33:47PM +0200, Ludo Brands wrote: > > Ludo, in your instructions for Intel you've got an FPC= shell > > variable: > > should that be PPC=? > > > > FPC= is a synonym of PP=, no? No. PP= the compiler. "ppc*.exe" with *=target architecture FPC= the frontloader binary t

[Lazarus] RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : Lazarus on Solaris 10

2011-07-28 Thread Ludo Brands
> Ludo, in your instructions for Intel you've got an FPC= shell > variable: > should that be PPC=? > FPC= is a synonym of PP=, no? > I think we might need to point out that export is a Bashism. > It is posix (http://www.unix.com/man-page/POSIX/1posix/export/). You're right sh in Oracle doe