I understand that there are (at least) two ways to do the remote display.
A) Read the pixels from the graphics driver. This is what VNC does. The
problem here is, that you don't know when an update is necessary (and
thus you need to do polling) and that reading the pixels needs a lot of
El 31/10/2012 10:13, Michael Schnell escribió:
I understand that there are (at least) two ways to do the remote display.
A) Read the pixels from the graphics driver. This is what VNC does.
The problem here is, that you don't know when an update is necessary
(and thus you need to do polling)
On 31/10/2012 09:13, Michael Schnell wrote:
I understand that there are (at least) two ways to do the remote
display.
A) Read the pixels from the graphics driver. This is what VNC does.
The problem here is, that you don't know when an update is necessary
(and thus you need to do polling)
On 10/31/2012 01:47 PM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Some /free software/ VNC implementations (e.g. UltraVNC) install their
own display driver [under Windows] to exactly know /when/ update is
needed and where.
Good to know !
Thanks,
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus
On 10/29/2012 06:43 PM, Bernd wrote:
NX also has the advantage you can just forward one application only,
not the entire desktop.
This sounds great for another purpose, that I supposedly will be facing
next year: Doing a headless embedded device with ARM/Linux and allow
for a remote user (via
2012/10/29 Santiago A. s...@ciberpiula.net:
Thank you very much, that is exactly what I wanted.
What about performance and latency?
There still is a noticeable delay but it is orders of magnitude faster
than VNC or conventional X11 tunneling. It is comparable to the
performance of RDP.
You
2012/10/30 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
1) the Server is an ARM device
2) the application is already running (supposedly showing it's GUI on some
virtual Desktop provided by the NX infrastructure) when NX attaches to it.
* It is possible to attach to a local running desktop (only to
On 10/30/2012 12:48 PM, Bernd wrote:
* It is possible to attach to a local running desktop (only to the
entire Desktop as far as I know) but then the performance degrades heavily
I don't see why this should be that way, but I would need to do further
investigations to find out if/how this can
2012/10/30 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
On 10/30/2012 12:48 PM, Bernd wrote:
* It is possible to attach to a local running desktop (only to the entire
Desktop as far as I know) but then the performance degrades heavily
I don't see why this should be that way, but I would need to do
Hello:
I have an old delphi application (a small ERP) running on a customer.
People connect using Windows Remote Desktop.
There are plans to increase the number of remote connections a lot (due
crisis, many employers will work only partial time from their homes). I
think that the remote desktop
Am 29.10.2012 11:54, schrieb Santiago A.:
Due people who connect remotely don't need the full application, just a
small subset, I was thinking about programing a reduced version in
Lazarus as frontend of the data, and show only the GUI remotely.
I have a couple of ideas:
Using a remote
El 29/10/2012 12:07, Michael Fuchs escribió:
I would split the application in a client and a server part. The
client contains the GUI part and communicates via
SOAP/XML-RPC/JSON-RPC/BINARY protocol with the server part.
The server part includes business logic and data storing.
Michael
Santiago A. wrote:
Using a remote Xwindows server (Are there good Xwindows server for win32?)
Making a web application using ExtJs
Doctrine has it that the X protocol isn't very good over long-distance
comms, i.e. anything other than an in-memory or LAN connection; it might
be improved if
Using a remote Xwindows server (Are there good Xwindows
server for win32?) Making a web application using ExtJs
Any hint? New ideas? Experiences?
Xming is one of the better Xservers for windows. I'm running 6.9.0.31 since
a while on XP sp2 but from time to time it crashes which is quite
Ludo Brands wrote:
Using a remote Xwindows server (Are there good Xwindows
server for win32?) Making a web application using ExtJs
Any hint? New ideas? Experiences?
Xming is one of the better Xservers for windows. I'm running 6.9.0.31 since
a while on XP sp2 but from time to time it crashes
On 10/29/2012 11:54 AM, Santiago A. wrote:
Any hint? New ideas? Experiences?
You could generate a web application, providing a browser-interface to
the users via Apache or IIS.
Unfortunately Lazarus does not offer very much support for this. But
some support indeed recently has been
On 10/29/2012 11:54 AM, Santiago A. wrote:
Using a remote Xwindows server (Are there good Xwindows server for win32?)
I once used XMing. It did work, but I think NX Free seems more advanced.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Le 29/10/2012 12:52, Michael Schnell a écrit :
On 10/29/2012 11:54 AM, Santiago A. wrote:
Using a remote Xwindows server (Are there good Xwindows server for
win32?)
I once used XMing. It did work, but I think NX Free seems more advanced.
-Michael
Right. I'm using it with OpenSuse 11.2 as
Am 29.10.2012 12:19, schrieb Santiago A.:
Well, that would be the ideal solution, but I don't want to implement a
full protocol all calls and answers.
Isn't there already a protocol defined to communicate in lazaris?
With the Webservice-Toolkit [1] you can easily implement this
Am 29.10.2012 13:01, schrieb Michael Fuchs:
With the Webservice-Toolkit [1] you can easily implement this
communication way.
Sorry, forgot the link:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Web_Service_Toolkit
Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Le 29/10/2012 12:52, Michael Schnell a écrit :
On 10/29/2012 11:54 AM, Santiago A. wrote:
Using a remote Xwindows server (Are there good Xwindows server for
win32?)
I once used XMing. It did work, but I think NX Free seems more advanced.
Look at http://www.nomachine.com/
-Michael
--
On 10/29/2012 11:54 AM, Santiago A. wrote:
Hello:
I have an old delphi application
Any hint? New ideas? Experiences?
You could make it a client/server application.
I have no experience on this using Lazarus, but on Delphi my colleagues
very successfully use the commercial RemObjects kit,
On 2012-10-29 11:54:16 +0100, Santiago A. wrote:
Hello:
I have an old delphi application (a small ERP) running on a customer.
People connect using Windows Remote Desktop.
There are plans to increase the number of remote connections a lot (due
crisis, many employers will work only partial
On 29-10-2012 13:57, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi Santiago, did you try to run the application from a remote location?,
by just publishing the database (assuming you are using a TCP database,
such as Firebird, Postgresql, SQL Server, ) port on your router, you
could connect
the client to
El 29/10/12 14:38, Reinier Olislagers escribió:
On 29-10-2012 13:57, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi Santiago, did you try to run the application from a remote location?,
by just publishing the database (assuming you are using a TCP database,
such as Firebird, Postgresql, SQL Server, ) port on
On 10/29/2012 03:21 PM, Santiago A. wrote:
I don't know why, but standard dataware controls generate a lot of
traffic.
This is because they mostly use SOAP which produces a huge overhead.
That is why we like RemObjects. which is appropriately scalable.
-Michael
--
El 29/10/12 14:38, Reinier Olislagers escribió:
On 29-10-2012 13:57, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi Santiago, did you try to run the application from a remote location?,
by just publishing the database (assuming you are using a TCP database,
such as Firebird, Postgresql, SQL Server, ) port on
I don't know why, but standard dataware controls generate a
lot of traffic. Perhaps it is a problem of bad application
design, but things that work properly in a LAN are almost
unusable in a WAN.
That is also my experience. If a client server app is not developped from
the beginning for
On 2012-10-29 15:54:45 +0100, Santiago A. wrote:
El 29/10/12 14:38, Reinier Olislagers escribió:
On 29-10-2012 13:57, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi Santiago, did you try to run the application from a remote location?,
by just publishing the database (assuming you are using a TCP database,
El 29/10/2012 16:55, Leonardo M. Ramé escribió:
On 2012-10-29 15:54:45 +0100, Santiago A. wrote:
No matter which protocol I'll use, I will do through a SSH tunnel or
VPN. Now, even remote desktop connections are done by an SSH tunnel with
client private keys. The problem is not security, but
give a look to this product:
http://thinstuff.com/
DF
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
also:
http://www.terminalserviceplus.com/
DF
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
2012/10/29 Antonio Fortuny a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu:
Using a remote Xwindows server (Are there good Xwindows server for
win32?)
I once used XMing. It did work, but I think NX Free seems more advanced.
-Michael
Right. I'm using it with OpenSuse 11.2 as server and a Windows client on
El 29/10/2012 18:10, duilio foschi escribió:
give a look to this product:
http://thinstuff.com/
DF
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Thinstuff is a
34 matches
Mail list logo
