-TObject-or-TComponent-have-a-Comment-property-tp4032315p4032398.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, leledumbo wrote:
Well, then they need to be added for Delphi compatiblity :o
I can't say anything anymore when the reason is this :)
They have been added. It's just not yet in trunk.
Hoo... a hidden branch?
It's not hidden. I suspect it is called joost
Michael.
On 15.07.2013 15:33, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, leledumbo wrote:
Well, then they need to be added for Delphi compatiblity :o
I can't say anything anymore when the reason is this :)
They have been added. It's just not yet in trunk.
Hoo... a hidden branch?
It's not
On 11 July 2013 23:07, Benito van der Zander ben...@benibela.de wrote:
Annotations like in Java would be nice...
On 07/11/2013 10:22 PM, vfclists . wrote:
Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the
On 12 July 2013 01:20, leledumbo leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id wrote:
Annotations like in Java would be nice...
No IMHO, that would complicate reading the code (more cluttered) as you can
see in the newer Delphi versions (called attributes instead of annotations
though).
This is what
cluttered) as you can
see in the newer Delphi versions (called attributes instead of annotations
though).
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Should-TObject-or-TComponent-have-a-Comment-property-tp4032315p4032318.html
Sent from the Free
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Benito van der Zander wrote:
as you can see in the newer Delphi versions (called attributes instead of
annotations though).
Well, then they need to be added for Delphi compatiblity :o
They have been added. It's just not yet in trunk.
Michael.
--
Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the
usage at design or runtime.
Smalltalk has it.
Consider it a version of the Hint property but for the developer
--
Frank Church
===
On 2013-07-11 21:22, vfclists . wrote:
Consider it a version of the Hint property but for the developer
That's the job of documentation. Fix the documentation in Lazarus IDE
(format, content, integration), and your problems is solved.
Regards,
G.
--
Annotations like in Java would be nice...
On 07/11/2013 10:22 PM, vfclists . wrote:
Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing
the usage at design or runtime.
Smalltalk has it.
Consider it a version of the
-Should-TObject-or-TComponent-have-a-Comment-property-tp4032315p4032318.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman
11 matches
Mail list logo
