> This is why somebody, who really succeeded in building a package for
> his system, should share it with the community. The above could be
> rephrased like "if you succeed in building ..., upload it to ... for use
> by others".
Yes. Debian / Ubuntu .dep package creation is documented in Gettin
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Then it says "it is recommended to build a fpc package for your
distribution (.deb or .rpm file)".
Why would it be recommended? I tried to build such RPM package when
installing FPC trunk for the first time, but I failed.
This is why somebody, who really *succeeded* i
> There is a option "Move" on the right menu, which asks for a new name
> - not sure if the general public has access to complete the move
> though.
It worked, thanks!
The old links are even forwarded to the new page.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
L
On 28 June 2010 11:55, Juha Manninen wrote:
>
> BTW, is it possible to rename a wiki page (file)? I used CamelCase names when
> I could have used spaces which are translated to underscores apparently.
There is a option "Move" on the right menu, which asks for a new name
- not sure if the general p
I reordered the Getting_Lazarus page. I moved some platform specific parts to
their own pages.
For example there is a long story about installing the Lazarus release version
for Ubuntu. Is it really so complicated?
See: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/LazarusReleaseUbuntu
And I found the buil
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
There are many ways to compile and install FPC. You can use plain make (see
below), but it is recommended to build a fpc package for your distribution
(.deb or .rpm file). A fpc package allows to easily uninstall, upgrade and
downgrade it and a package makes sure that a
On 6/27/2010 16:22, Juha Manninen wrote:
Mattias Gärtner wrote :
Then it says "it is recommended to build a fpc package for your
distribution (.deb or .rpm file)".
Why would it be recommended? I tried to build such RPM package when
installing FPC trunk for the first time, but I failed.
... th
28.06.2010 2:32, Marco van de Voort пишет:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
-installs under Linux under /usr/local/lib, while the
packages install under /usr/lib
Depends on the distribution and package conventions of that package system.
Can be fixed at least
Mattias Gärtner wrote :
>> Then it says "it is recommended to build a fpc package for your
>> distribution (.deb or .rpm file)".
>> Why would it be recommended? I tried to build such RPM package when
>> installing FPC trunk for the first time, but I failed.
>
> ... then the rpm should be fixed.
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> -installs under Linux under /usr/local/lib, while the
> packages install under /usr/lib
Depends on the distribution and package conventions of that package system.
--
___
Lazarus mai
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:51:02 +0100
Chris Kirkpatrick wrote:
>
>
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > For example because "make install"
> > -does not update your fpc.cfg,
> > -does not update the symlink under Linux (is this still the case?),
> > -no uninstall
> > -installs under Linux under /usr/l
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
For example because "make install"
-does not update your fpc.cfg,
-does not update the symlink under Linux (is this still the case?),
-no uninstall
-installs under Linux under /usr/local/lib, while the
packages install under /usr/lib
In my experience, packages ins
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:34:26 +0300
Juha Manninen wrote:
> I updated info about building and installing svn trunk version of FPC
> compiler, based on mails from Marc and Graeme earlier. Here:
>
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Getting_Lazarus#svn_trunk_version_of_fpc
>
> It is part of a l
I updated info about building and installing svn trunk version of FPC
compiler, based on mails from Marc and Graeme earlier. Here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Getting_Lazarus#svn_trunk_version_of_fpc
It is part of a long messy page, Getting_Lazarus, which could be cleaned a
lot.
This i
14 matches
Mail list logo
