Am 06.12.2010 14:54, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:45:59AM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
On 27.11.2010 22:35, Florian Kl?mpfl wrote:
Am 27.11.2010 22:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
[OT]Can I cross compile FPC for another target using the Makefile?
e.g.
make clean all
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:45:59AM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
On 27.11.2010 22:35, Florian Kl?mpfl wrote:
Am 27.11.2010 22:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
[OT]Can I cross compile FPC for another target using the Makefile?
e.g.
make clean all OS_TARGET=linux
?
Would this create a compiler
On 27.11.2010 22:35, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 27.11.2010 22:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
[OT]Can I cross compile FPC for another target using the Makefile?
e.g.
make clean all OS_TARGET=linux
?
Would this create a compiler that can run on Linux if I do this on
Windows? That's what I'm unsure
On 27 November 2010 17:22, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 27.11.2010 18:16, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Calling the system to ask for the last-modification time that often
(even with all/most data cached by the OS) would take that long on
Windows, while under Linux it wouldn't
On 27.11.2010 18:53, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 27 November 2010 17:22, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 27.11.2010 18:16, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Calling the system to ask for the last-modification time that often
(even with all/most data cached by the OS) would take that long
On 27 November 2010 18:04, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
While I agree that FAT today is no good any longer (except for small usb
keys and such ^^), I'd like to know your reasons why you think NTFS is
stuck in the dark ages as well.
My comment was probably unfair, since ntfs
Am 27.11.2010 18:53, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
Also, the features of the filesystems
are so different, you can't even compare them. fat and ntfs are stuck
in the dark ages compared to ext*.
Modern NTFS implementations have some really nice and advanced features
none of the ext* has: snapshoting
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:14:38 +0100
Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Am 27.11.2010 18:53, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
Also, the features of the filesystems
are so different, you can't even compare them. fat and ntfs are stuck
in the dark ages compared to ext*.
Modern NTFS
Am 27.11.2010 20:31, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:14:38 +0100
Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Am 27.11.2010 18:53, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
Also, the features of the filesystems
are so different, you can't even compare them. fat and ntfs are stuck
in the
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:14:38 +0100
Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Am 27.11.2010 18:53, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
Also, the features of the filesystems
are so different, you can't even
On 27.11.2010 21:00, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 27.11.2010 20:31, schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:14:38 +0100
Florian Klämpflflor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Am 27.11.2010 18:53, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
Also, the features of the filesystems
are so different, you can't even
Am 27.11.2010 22:11, schrieb Sven Barth:
[OT]Can I cross compile FPC for another target using the Makefile?
e.g.
make clean all OS_TARGET=linux
?
Does
FPC use units (outside of compiler) that aren't part of the RTL?[/OT]
No.
Wow O.o I should test something like this on my computer...
12 matches
Mail list logo
