Actually startlazarus just starts lazarus (as its name implies), you can see
the source code yourself
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-startlazarus-x-lazarus-tp4035408p4035431.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive
hi,
because using startlazarus if lazarus operates the same way?
thanks
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 1/15/14, Junior lazarus.li...@gmail.com wrote:
because using startlazarus if lazarus operates the same way?
I'm very sorry, but I don't know what that sentnce means.
Bart
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 15/01/2014 11:36, Junior wrote:
hi,
because using startlazarus if lazarus operates the same way?
IF that was meant to be Why
They do not behave the same.
If you rebuild lazarus, and you are NOT admin/root, then you may not
have filesystem permission to write Lazarus exe to the original
ok, so in Linux, there is no need to have startlazarus.
Em 15-01-2014 09:59, Martin escreveu:
On 15/01/2014 11:36, Junior wrote:
hi,
because using startlazarus if lazarus operates the same way?
IF that was meant to be Why
They do not behave the same.
If you rebuild lazarus, and you are
On 15/01/2014 13:15, Junior wrote:
ok, so in Linux, there is no need to have startlazarus.
I did not say that. And by default there is.
Default =
- you are not root
- installed in /usr/local/...
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
ok, thanks
Em 15-01-2014 10:19, Martin escreveu:
On 15/01/2014 13:15, Junior wrote:
ok, so in Linux, there is no need to have startlazarus.
I did not say that. And by default there is.
Default =
- you are not root
- installed in /usr/local/...
--
