On 2013-04-06 09:34, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
> Why you hate "master", i believe it is for last working version, here is
> tiOPF3, i do that, and for me it have all fixes in it, so who need last of
> every thing he will take "master".
I'm not sure I fully understand your email. But I'll explain what I
I have managed to get the tiopf2 working. It is easier and clearer than the
last time I used it. @Zaher Have you been able to get tiopf3 working on
Lazarus?
On 6 April 2013 09:34, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
> Why you hate "master", i believe it is for last working version, here is
> tiOPF3, i do that,
Why you hate "master", i believe it is for last working version, here is
tiOPF3, i do that, and for me it have all fixes in it, so who need last of
every thing he will take "master".
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 2013-04-05 18:03, Frank Church wrote:
> >
> > Which
On 2013-04-05 18:03, Frank Church wrote:
>
> Which branch should I checkout to use with Lazarus?
tiOPF2 branch.
FPC still can't compile the tiOPF3 branch, due to Unicode and other
Delphi language features. Feature wise, tiOPF2 and tiOPF3 are near
identical, and I keep them in sync.
> The inform
On 1 March 2013 09:16, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In case there are anybody using tiOPF, please note the following. I'll
> also update the Free Pascal wiki in the next few minutes.
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Repository migrated to Git
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:4
Hi,
In case there are anybody using tiOPF, please note the following. I'll
also update the Free Pascal wiki in the next few minutes.
Original Message
Subject: Repository migrated to Git
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:43:33 +
From: Graeme Geldenhuys
Newsgroups: tiopf.development,
